ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Simon Denier-3

Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?

I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.

--
 Simon




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Tudor Girba
Hi,

Where can I get an RC3 from?

Cheers,
Doru


On 16 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:

>
> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>
> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks  
> like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Alexandre Bergel
In reply to this post by Simon Denier-3
I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed (loadDefault does  
not seem to do the job).
But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.

Cheers,
Alexandre


On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:

>
> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>
> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks  
> like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Simon Denier-3

On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

> I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed (loadDefault does not seem to do the job).
> But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.


Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got loaded, including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which launch an infinite loop.



>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
>
>>
>> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>>
>> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
>>
>> --
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
 Simon




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Alexandre Bergel
Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the  
deadline is approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of  
Moose, but I do not think this is the idea.

Cheers,
Alexandre


On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:

>
> On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed (loadDefault does  
>> not seem to do the job).
>> But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
>
>
> Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got loaded,  
> including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which launch an  
> infinite loop.
>
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>>>
>>> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it  
>>> looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Tudor Girba
If it's moose algos, than just load the latest version manually.

Doru

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 16, 2010, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
> I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the  
> deadline is approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of  
> Moose, but I do not think this is the idea.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>
>>> I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed (loadDefault  
>>> does not seem to do the job).
>>> But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
>>
>>
>> Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got  
>> loaded, including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which  
>> launch an infinite loop.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>>>>
>>>> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it  
>>>> looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform  
>>>> loadDefault.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Simon Denier-3
In reply to this post by Alexandre Bergel

If you load the latest packages of MooseAlgos, you should not have any problem.


On 16 mars 2010, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

> Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
> I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the deadline is approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of Moose, but I do not think this is the idea.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>
>>> I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed (loadDefault does not seem to do the job).
>>> But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
>>
>>
>> Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got loaded, including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which launch an infinite loop.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>>>>
>>>> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
 Simon




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Simon Denier-3
In reply to this post by Simon Denier-3

I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in RC3, default Moose loads older packages. Could it be that the version of Metacello is different? A problem with recursive projects?

I have in 10508  ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
and in 10515    >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]


On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:

>
> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>
> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>

--
 Simon




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Dale
Simon,

I'll take a look this morning and see what's up ...

Dale
----- "Simon Denier" <[hidden email]> wrote:

| I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in RC3,
| default Moose loads older packages. Could it be that the version of
| Metacello is different? A problem with recursive projects?
|
| I have in 10508  ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| and in 10515    >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
|
|
| On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
|
| >
| > Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
| >
| > I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks
| like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
| >
| > --
| > Simon
| >
| >
| >
|
| --
|  Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Dale
In reply to this post by Simon Denier-3
Simon,

This is indeed a bug in 1.0-beta.24. I expect to have a bugfix today and will release 1.0-beta.24.1 when it's ready ... Good catch.

Dale
----- "Simon Denier" <[hidden email]> wrote:

| I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in RC3,
| default Moose loads older packages. Could it be that the version of
| Metacello is different? A problem with recursive projects?
|
| I have in 10508  ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| and in 10515    >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
|
|
| On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
|
| >
| > Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
| >
| > I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it looks
| like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
| >
| > --
| > Simon
| >
| >
| >
|
| --
|  Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Dale
Submited Issue 66 (http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=66) to cover the prboblem.

Dale

----- "Dale Henrichs" <[hidden email]> wrote:

| Simon,
|
| This is indeed a bug in 1.0-beta.24. I expect to have a bugfix today
| and will release 1.0-beta.24.1 when it's ready ... Good catch.
|
| Dale
| ----- "Simon Denier" <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
| | I managed to load default Moose in 10508 without problem. But in
| RC3,
| | default Moose loads older packages. Could it be that the version of
| | Metacello is different? A problem with recursive projects?
| |
| | I have in 10508  ~1.0-beta.21 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| | and in 10515    >=1.0-beta.24 [ConfigurationOfMetacello]
| |
| |
| | On 16 mars 2010, at 11:51, Simon Denier wrote:
| |
| | >
| | > Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
| | >
| | > I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it
| looks
| | like it loads some old packages even if I perform loadDefault.
| | >
| | > --
| | > Simon
| | >
| | >
| | >
| |
| | --
| |  Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ConfigurationOfMoose weird behavior

Alexandre Bergel
In reply to this post by Simon Denier-3
True.
Thanks!

Cheers,
Alexandre


On 16 Mar 2010, at 19:00, Simon Denier wrote:

>
> If you load the latest packages of MooseAlgos, you should not have  
> any problem.
>
>
> On 16 mars 2010, at 21:37, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> Simon, do you know which test I should exclude?
>> I am currently conducting an experiment on Moose unit test, and the  
>> deadline is approaching. Naturally, I could use an old version of  
>> Moose, but I do not think this is the idea.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On 16 Mar 2010, at 07:52, Simon Denier wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 16 mars 2010, at 13:34, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also tried to load it in RC3. I somehow managed (loadDefault  
>>>> does not seem to do the job).
>>>> But I couldn't run the test. They block after a while.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, that's because old package versions from MooseAlgos got  
>>> loaded, including the one with a wrong recursive behavior which  
>>> launch an infinite loop.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Alexandre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16 Mar 2010, at 06:51, Simon Denier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Did anyone manage to load a clean Moose in Pharo 1.0 RC3?
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to load ConfigurationOfPharo first, then Moose, but it  
>>>>> looks like it loads some old packages even if I perform  
>>>>> loadDefault.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>>>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev