Hi guys.
So Benjamin Arezki is working on PetitJava and FAST for Java and I'm very happy about that. Now I want to make a well structured project with an opportunity to integrate it into Moose. Can anyone suggest me what to do with the configuration? Because it's hard for me to understand me all the shenanigans with metacello. Should I store each package separately, add all of them into a baseline and then add them with versions to a 'version'? I'd really like to make a good use of my project, but I need help form you (especially Doru ;) ) Cheers! Uko -- View this message in context: http://moose-dev.97923.n3.nabble.com/Configuring-FAST-metacello-tp4028315.html Sent from the moose-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi Yuriy, Good news. I would be happy to help. I will try to make a bit of time sometime next week. Please ping me on Wednesday, if I did not react until then. Cheers, Doru On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi guys. "Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Thanks
On 9 серп. 2013, at 23:55, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Hi Doru,
so I'm pinging :) uko On 9 серп. 2013, at 23:55, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Pong :). I took a look at the configuration, and I think you need three different projects: - FASTCore -> FAMIX (which we do not have yet, but we should add it) - FASTJava -> FASTCore, PetitJava
- FASTPharo -> FASTCore This implies three different configurations. The little visualization you have should be packaged in a separate project altogether. Also, I do not quite understand the need for the FAMIX wrapper classes from FAST-Model. For example, you have "FAMIXSourcedEntity subclass: #FASTBehaviouralEntity"
Why was FAMIXBehaviouralEntity not enough? Doru On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
As I remember it, it was a suggestion of Stephane and Marcus to isolate FAST from FAMIX nicolas On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > > Also, I do not quite understand the need for the FAMIX wrapper classes > from FAST-Model. For example, you have > "FAMIXSourcedEntity subclass: #FASTBehaviouralEntity" > > Why was FAMIXBehaviouralEntity not enough? > > Doru > -- Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria) _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
The AST should certainly be separate, like it is now. But, it would be more effective to have the FAMIX entity directly linked with the AST. I used this pattern on a couple of projects and it makes querying quite cheap. Cheers, Doru On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Yes, I followed Stef's suggestion. Moreover at the beginning I wasn't so sure about what I'm doing, so I didn't want to mess directly with FAMIX Uko Надіслано з iPhone
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Ok, so as far as I understand - we'll release Moose 4.8 and then I can start to integrate FAST into Moose 5?
Uko On 17 серп. 2013, at 09:15, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Well, you can start splitting the project anyway. Doru On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Yes, so I'll add corresponding projects to the Moose team on SmalltalkHub, OK?
Uko On 20 серп. 2013, at 13:00, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Hi everyone! An image with everything loaded can be fetched from here: https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/FAST-On-Moose/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/FAST-On-Moose.zip Feedback is appreciated :) Uko On 20 серп. 2013, at 13:00, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
great! thanks a lot for your continuous implication in the project nicolas On 08/30/2013 12:14 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk
wrote:
-- Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria) _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 30 серп. 2013, at 14:36, Nicolas Anquetil <[hidden email]> wrote:
Well, I'm responsible for what I've created :). Thank you for helping me during main development stage. Uko
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Uko2
Cool
I'm trying to parse ADA so may be after we will see if we can get FASTAda :) On Aug 30, 2013, at 12:14 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Uko2
Stef wrote:
>I'm trying to parse ADA so may be after we will see if we can get FASTAda :) FASTDelphi is also on our list. Stephan _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |