Part of my website will involve a straightforward admin section. By simple, I mean: I will be the only one using it, and I don't need a full authentication/authorization system. My initial thought is to make a separate web application in the same image. The admin applcation would extend WAComponent but would be completely different from the public facing site. This site would be hidden behind Seaside's simple authentication, and I would call it a working application. Does anyone see any issues in this implementation? Thanks! ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary Public Key: http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 #BitMessage BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV http://www.codeandmusic.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
I usually just make a subclass of my user class e.g. MySuperUser class and
just add the admin stuff to a component in my app thats only shown to those users, generally accessed in the footer of the HTML document. Rather than making a separate app. In that way I can - reuse all the account management stuff I have already - I only have one nginx configuration to manage - the page is already styled like & behaves like the rest of the app - I can expose beta functionality in the app to MySuperUser class users - and I can "become" regular app users to see whats going on in an account if something is weird for a user without having to authenticate as them in some other way. A separate app seems fine though too if you prefer. Kind of depends on what you want to do as admin I guess. And I'm sure there are things I'd like to do if I only knew. sergio_101 wrote > Part of my website will involve a straightforward admin section. By > simple, I mean: I will be the only one using it, and I don't need a full > authentication/authorization system. > > My initial thought is to make a separate web application in the same > image. The admin applcation would extend WAComponent but would be > completely different from the public facing site. This site would be > hidden behind Seaside's simple authentication, and I would call it a > working application. > > Does anyone see any issues in this implementation? > > Thanks! > > > > ---- > peace, > sergio > photographer, journalist, visionary > > Public Key: http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 > #BitMessage BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV > http://www.codeandmusic.com > http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 > http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 > > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > seaside@.squeakfoundation > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > > > signature.asc (849 bytes) > <http://forum.world.st/attachment/5100519/0/signature.asc> -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Seaside-General-f86180.html _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |