Creative Commons assets

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Creative Commons assets

Casey Ransberger-2
Did we ever get around to touching base with SFC about using CC artwork (I'm thinking icons) in Squeak?

I'd really like to understand the chemical interactions between the CC and MIT licenses, but I don't have extra scratch to pay an IP lawyer.

I'd like to think about incorporating some of the CC icons that were recently released by HPI.

Can we leverage SFC to discover this information?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Creative Commons assets

Chris Muller-3
I don't want to distract from your question about CC licensing, which
I think is a good question, but perhaps there are some truly free
icons out there we can pick from, just quickly to get some "new paint"
into the place?

I'm definitely interested in seeing Squeak refreshing its icon-set,
but less interested in wrangling about licensing semantics.  I'm sure
we can forward your question to the SFC and hope for a clear-cut
answer.  In the meantime, are there are _free_ icons worth
considering?

 - Chris


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Casey Ransberger
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Did we ever get around to touching base with SFC about using CC artwork (I'm thinking icons) in Squeak?
>
> I'd really like to understand the chemical interactions between the CC and MIT licenses, but I don't have extra scratch to pay an IP lawyer.
>
> I'd like to think about incorporating some of the CC icons that were recently released by HPI.
>
> Can we leverage SFC to discover this information?
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Creative Commons assets

Casey Ransberger-2
Not that I've found. It seems most stuff is CC or GNU, and I know for certain that the latter won't work for us. I've considered hiring someone to do some new ones and put them under MIT. Sadly and ironically, art is a hard job to find a volunteer for.

On Dec 17, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I don't want to distract from your question about CC licensing, which
> I think is a good question, but perhaps there are some truly free
> icons out there we can pick from, just quickly to get some "new paint"
> into the place?
>
> I'm definitely interested in seeing Squeak refreshing its icon-set,
> but less interested in wrangling about licensing semantics.  I'm sure
> we can forward your question to the SFC and hope for a clear-cut
> answer.  In the meantime, are there are _free_ icons worth
> considering?
>
> - Chris
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Casey Ransberger
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Did we ever get around to touching base with SFC about using CC artwork (I'm thinking icons) in Squeak?
>>
>> I'd really like to understand the chemical interactions between the CC and MIT licenses, but I don't have extra scratch to pay an IP lawyer.
>>
>> I'd like to think about incorporating some of the CC icons that were recently released by HPI.
>>
>> Can we leverage SFC to discover this information?
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Creative Commons assets

Chris Muller-3
What about these?  I had trouble finding mention of any specific
license, other than "Free".

    http://findicons.com/

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Casey Ransberger
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Not that I've found. It seems most stuff is CC or GNU, and I know for certain that the latter won't work for us. I've considered hiring someone to do some new ones and put them under MIT. Sadly and ironically, art is a hard job to find a volunteer for.
>
> On Dec 17, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Chris Muller <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I don't want to distract from your question about CC licensing, which
>> I think is a good question, but perhaps there are some truly free
>> icons out there we can pick from, just quickly to get some "new paint"
>> into the place?
>>
>> I'm definitely interested in seeing Squeak refreshing its icon-set,
>> but less interested in wrangling about licensing semantics.  I'm sure
>> we can forward your question to the SFC and hope for a clear-cut
>> answer.  In the meantime, are there are _free_ icons worth
>> considering?
>>
>> - Chris
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Casey Ransberger
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Did we ever get around to touching base with SFC about using CC artwork (I'm thinking icons) in Squeak?
>>>
>>> I'd really like to understand the chemical interactions between the CC and MIT licenses, but I don't have extra scratch to pay an IP lawyer.
>>>
>>> I'd like to think about incorporating some of the CC icons that were recently released by HPI.
>>>
>>> Can we leverage SFC to discover this information?
>>>
>>
>
>