--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
> a Smalltalk competition with university scholarships as prizes $50k !!? Thats a hell of a lot for not much detail. * What sort of competition? * How many prizes at what size? * What governance model? * Which universities? On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Richard Eng <[hidden email]> wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
It's a national Smalltalk competition in Canada (for starters).
Total: $22,000 The remaining $28,000 are for administering the competition, eg, renting halls at the 6 venues (Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, Halifax, Winnipeg); mailing out flyers to all the secondary schools across Canada; possibly renting PCs for the event. The costs haven't been researched yet, so it's not clear whether $50k is too much or not enough. On Friday, 27 February 2015 10:38:20 UTC-5, Ben Coman wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
That helps, but still... > The costs haven't been researched yet This still sounds like an "concept" rather than a "plan". Concepts can burn money quickly and ineffectively. So is developing the plan going to part of the administration costs? Fair enough. But then how about a smaller target just for the funds to develop the plan and costs, and get some runs on the board with deliverables to build trust. Excluding some corporate backing, $50k = 500 x $100. So scaling 500 x $10= $5000 should be enough to deliver a detailed plan (maybe needing some extra hours on love time). You get see if the interest is there, given that people are more likely to contribute at less risk. We get to review the plan to judge whether we believe your capable of delivering on it prior to committing greater funds. What would be the form and rules of the competition to select a winner? On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Richard Eng <[hidden email]> wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Okay, this is where everybody in the Smalltalk community can help me. I've never organized a competition in my life, so I'm really winging it here.
-- This first competition will be a pilot to try out the concept. It will be a national Canadian competition. If it works out, then we can look at expanding the competition to other countries, such as the U.S., Australia, Hong Kong, Argentina, etc. It will be held at 6 venues for good national coverage: Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, Halifax, and Winnipeg. It will be open to all secondary school students. Students must register for the competition (I'm thinking of a registration website, written in Seaside, of course!). Completed assignments will be gathered and judged according to:
My concept is to have a one-day competition. Participants will be gathered in a hall for up to 6 hours to perform the assignment. Volunteers will oversee the gathering and collect the completed assignments. Key questions:
A panel of judges must be chosen from among you. Who will volunteer? Volunteers will be needed to oversee the venues. Please submit your names. The times for the competition will vary across all venues to take time zones into account. Unfortunately, one of these venues will either have to start very early or very late! These are my thoughts so far. I may have overlooked a few things. On Saturday, 28 February 2015 01:29:11 UTC-5, Ben Coman wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Excerpts from Richard Eng's message of 2015-02-28 14:20:31 +0100:
> It will be open to all secondary school students. > 1. What Smalltalk assignment can we present to the participants, who are > Smalltalk newbies, that can be done within 6 hours? Please submit your > suggestions. having just made the experience getting students to do smalltalk tasks at google code-in, i feel, this is a hard question. the students will take a few hours to even familiarize themselves with smalltalk, so i wonder if that is even a good idea? what about write-in assignments, done at home, to a certain deadline? anyone who completes the assignment is then invited to the competition. the home assignment can be simple: do a tutorial (from squeak by example or pharo by example) and upload the resulting image. at that point everyone is familiar with smalltalk. and the competition is more meaningful. the google melange platform can be used to manage registrations and submissions. (it's Free Software, so a copy can be set up somewhere, why reinvent the wheel? focus on the actual goal. the students won't notice that melange is not written in smalltalk) those who get hooked from doing the tutorial will do more, and they will in turn do better at the competition. at code-in some students had a real drive to do as much as they could in order to win that trip to google headquarters. i think the goal should be to get students interested in smalltalk. if they come to the competition without preparation, then you only have 6 hours to impress them. if they don't win anything, will that last? if instead they they work at home for some weeks, and they like it, they will remember that, regardless of the outcome of the competition. greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org secretary beijinglug.org mentor fossasia.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by horrido
I've never organised such a competition either - so my help is limited to feedback, and also you'll need local help and I'm in Australia. I'd like to encourage your endeavours, so please excuse most of these thoughts off the top of my head could be discouraging. I'm trying to be pragmatic... * Perhaps splitting it into a $1000 prize per venue would be better. This is the sort of thing where where the volume of winners might be better than the size of the winning. Less issues with co-ordinating timezones. $1000 still seems unreasonably big for secondary school students. * It might even be better to bring the pilot down to school level, with prizes of $100. I expect you would contact several local schools to discuss what similar competitions are held, and what level of prizes are common (that is, before mentioning what prizes you might offer). * Doing ANYTHING reasonable in a new language in 6 hours seems unrealistic. You might need to co-ordinate with secondary schools teaching Pharo, so the competition is towards the end of the course. Otherwise any student that happens to have used Pharo would have a culpable advantage. * How many kids do you estimate will actually be touched by this program? If you get 200 kids at each of five venues, that is 1000 kids, then its effectively $50 per kid providing a benefit ONE TIME ONLY. And how many of those kids, after a 6 hours exposure are likely to be retained? Actually I think it would be better to put $50k into developing a teaching program aligned with the school curriculum. Prepared material is always useful to teachers - they never have enough time. Lets say 10% of final year students do the course = 30,000 kids [1] ~ $2 per kid. Then the next year, the same material could used again to teach another 30,000 kids ~ $1 per kid, and so on. Seems a better use of resources. * Indeed, you might contact the education board to see if they would share costs dollar-for-dollar. Or you might be able to tap into funding programs that already aim to get student working with technology. You get to influence the programs by contributing funds to develop the programs - but you are probably competing with the likes of Microsoft here. Anyway, once you know what they are willing to spend, you can fundraise to meet that equivalent. * Maybe the French speaking parts of Canada would like some programming course material in their native language. You might sell the idea that Pharo is based in France, and would be a good source of producing such material for them. * You might locate other programming competitions in your area and attend as a volunteer. Hard experience is what you'll really need to pull it off successfully. Reporting learnings from experience such would help build trust for contributors that you can deliver a working competition. If no-one else is doing similar programs, maybe there is good reason its not done (or equally maybe the others are wrong - you'd just need to consider it) good luck, cheers -ben On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Richard Eng <[hidden email]> wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Martin Bähr
Oh, sorry, I knew I forgot something! I should've told you that I expect the participants to download, install, and learn Smalltalk in the months preceding the competition...
-- The competition will be announced at the beginning of the school year in September. The date of the competition is Saturday, January 16, 2016. That gives students at least 3 leisurely months to get familiar with Smalltalk (Pharo, actually). When they arrive at the competition, they should be ready to go straight to the assignment (design, code, test, debug). On Saturday, 28 February 2015 10:31:18 UTC-5, Martin Bähr wrote: Excerpts from Richard Eng's message of 2015-02-28 14:20:31 +0100: You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Ben Coman-3
There are many different ways to envision a programming competition. Your suggested format is perfectly valid.
-- However, I was thinking that in order to generate real excitement, to provide a powerful incentive, you have to think BIG. A $50 million lottery gets a lot more players than a $5 million lottery. The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Home Lottery draws lots of attention because of the huge prizes (eg, a $3.6 million show home, a $110,000 2015 Maserati Ghibli, a 10-day vacation to Kalimantan & Bali's Heritage). A First prize of $10,000 covers one year's tuition to a top-notch Canadian university. This is surely on the minds of many secondary school students. Even $2,000 goes a long way to defray the cost of university (which is a chronic issue in Canada, I don't know about Australia). On Saturday, 28 February 2015 10:35:53 UTC-5, Ben Coman wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Ben Coman-3
There are problems with regional competitions instead of a national one. In Halifax, I expect far fewer participants than in, say, Toronto. Is it fair that competition is much reduced for participants in some provinces than others?
-- Until we review the registrations, it's anybody's guess how many kids will be touched by this competition. I'm sanguine that we'll get a large number of entrants. It's a one-time benefit unless its success ushers in an annual competition with continuing sponsorship. Do not underestimate the PR value of such a competition. I hope to raise Smalltalk's profile in the education system, and subsequently in the IT world Trying to insert a teaching program into the school curriculum runs afoul of a lot of bureaucracy and politics. I'm trying to avoid all that. I like your idea about appealing to Quebec's French roots. I'll definitely follow up on that. On Saturday, 28 February 2015 10:35:53 UTC-5, Ben Coman wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Richard Eng <[hidden email]> wrote:
--
You also create "potential" for a BIG FAIL and subsequent poor PR. Your example does not relate since: * these guys help make people not die - much closer to people's hearts * they are a credible public institution with an established and trusted administration * its pure gambling, people contribute because of the chance to personally gain something * there is nothing more to organise than for the hospital to do than draw the tickets. btw, I personally would not be involved in contributing $50k to an individual for something like this. At this level, it would need to run through a trust with a legal charter defining how the funds will be used, with a followup audit by someone from a reputable accounting firm.
Fair enough. Then it probably should be marketed as a "scholarship" to "their" chosen university rather than a cash prize. You can pay direct to the university on their behalf.
To eliminate unfairness between regions, just run in one region for the first year. Start with the biggest one most likely to succeed - or just the one you live in. Running in multiple regions really adds a huge co-ordination load and risk to success. Not having run such a competition before, "You" need to be in direct control of whats happening, and "You" cannot be in multiple locations at one time. How do you get managers for other locations? Paid or volunteer? What is the history of their involvement with you such that you know of the their trust-worthiness? How can you GUARANTEE either even turn up. Pretty poor publicity if even one of the venues falls apart because someone bailed, or their car ran out of gas without backup. Its great to think big, but have it as a three or five year PLAN to start small and GROW with each success.
And so you'd be expecting contributors to contribute the same each year? How guaranteed do you think that is? What PR image do you present by being able to only run one year?
This is a good point - but only if you succeed. There are PR risks.
Yeah, it could be hard work over a longer period. But the payoff would be greater. There are different ways to do it. Start at the top, or start at the bottom. I suggest starting at the bottom talking with teachers in your area, since they probably get to choose their own material, and having a competition at the end of a course makes the teaching "real" - which is a great boon for teachers. You want the teachers promoting the competition. They can validate the concept and some will be volunteer organisers - that bring with them trust and reputation. If you get ten involved each providing 10 kids then you get 100 participants. Good enough for proof of concept. (Aside: schools aren't real... http://www.paulgraham.com/nerds.html)
This was less about the competition and more about delivering education material for individual regions. Using this for a competition between regions could backfire PR wise.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 20:24:17 UTC-5, Ben Coman wrote:
--
I share your sentiments. I'm quite amazed by the kinds of crowdfunding campaigns at GoFundMe. Many of them have goals of $40k, $140k, even $500k. And some of these lofty goals have been met. Even the $500k campaign (to provide for 4 infants whose mother died) is already at the $232k mark after one month!!! So my $50k goal is certainly not out of the ordinary. This whole crowdfunding phenomenon blows me away – it defies common sense. But, hey, if my campaign works, colour me impressed!
Depending on the result of the crowdfunding effort, or my other efforts to secure corporate sponsorship, I shall seriously consider your suggestions here. They're very good. Thanks. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by horrido
I've completely revised my plans for the Smalltalk competition...
-- There are 3 key modifications:
The length of the competition has also been shortened from 6 hours to 3. The former was probably too long for students to cope with. Here's the new flyer: I still need judges for the competition. Judges will need to grade the Smalltalk assignment for correctness and accuracy. I'm not sure how to find these judges. This Smalltalk forum seems to be sparsely inhabited, so that may be why I'm getting very little response. Where else can I ask for volunteers?? On Thursday, 26 February 2015 22:30:02 UTC-5, Richard Eng wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Richard Eng <[hidden email]> wrote:
Good - but I would run the gofundme campaign around the lower total amount for one year. This is a level I feel comfortable contributing to a stranger. Of course administration costs are then proportionally greater, but maybe sponsorship can help that (see below)
Just to dig into details, how will you define a "participating" school? Have you already had some feedback from some teachers? As part of your strategy, you might fund provision of a printed copy of these important books to "participating" schools: * Valloud - A Mentoring Course on Smalltalk (a "must" read to get the Smalltalk philosopy, recommended if you haven't already read it) http://www.lulu.com/shop/andres-valloud/a-mentoring-course-on-smalltalk/paperback/product-3788890.html * Pharo By Example - updated for Pharo 4. Actually, maybe you even consider replacing third prize with 10 or more winners of a prize pack with these books - since this both stretches the money further to more winners, and also education is the best way to spread the word of Smalltalk, and the books can be shared wider again by the winners. Actually, maybe this would be one of the more favourable backdoor outcomes, as a way to select leading young programmers to indoctrinate into the Smalltalk way. Others will want to emulate them.
You need to get some ideas for competition puzzles well in advance, and run some pilots in individual schools. You can publish these puzzles some everyone gets the chance to practice and the pilot schools are not at a great advantage.
Search for Canadian smalltalk job postings [1] and contact these companies directly. Such a competition could directly benefit them to supply potential future employees (often a problem for Smalltalk companies). By supplying judges, they get to survey the talent. Also, industry involvement is an additional incentive for students - being exposed to potential employers, and the possibility of part time work during their studies. A visit to their offices could be an auxiliary prize (such as it is with google competitions, though tis not so sexy as google). They may even sponsor, which apart from a direct cash benefit can add a credible logo to the flyer. good luck with it. cheers -ben
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
The GoFundMe campaign has been a dismal failure. I've learned from my mistakes and I'm about to launch a new crowdfunding campaign at Kickstarter. I'll be doing things much differently. Stay tuned.
-- I'd like to ask if someone can come up with a Smalltalk-related riddle question for a little game I intend to present at my new crowdfunding campaign. It should NOT be technical because donors to the campaign should not have to go through a Smalltalk tutorial in order to play. Make no assumptions about the background of the donors. Thanks. On Sunday, 15 March 2015 10:01:58 UTC-4, Ben Coman wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |