Cryptography-cmm.8 on Seaside 2.8.4 windows

---

Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! + Buscados: Top 10 - Celebridades - Música - Esportes
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

Rogério Borba: Please, comment which Smalltalk dialect. Remember Seaside runs in most if not all smalltalk dialects :)  I guess you are talking about squeak. Few comments: 

1) Seaside 2.8.4 is based on Pharo, not Squeak. Pharo is a fork or squeak. You can read more of pharo in the website: http://www.pharo-project.org. This question, and all the Pharo related, would be best to be asked in pharo mailing list. I mean, you will get more answers there than here.

2) As Pharo is not Squeak, there are packages that works on Squeak but doesn't in Pharo. Cryptography is an example. I tried to load Cryptography  and get a DNU InputEventSensor>>mousePoint. Was this your problem ? I tried it in Linux and Windows, same result.

3) I don't know why you need this packages but for PostgreSQL driver I use the Cryptography 0.3 version from Universe and at least work ok for me. To do this. evaluate this:

|instClass |
Preferences disable: #showDeprecationWarnings.
instClass := Smalltalk at: #Installer ifAbsent: [ScriptLoader loadLatestPackage: 'Installer-Core' fromSqueaksource: 'Installer'. Smalltalk at: #Installer].

ScriptLoader new universalInstaller universe   
    update;
    addPackage: 'Cryptography';
    install.


Cheers,

Mariano




_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

Hello —,

Am 2009-06-17 um 03:26 schrieb Mariano Martinez Peck:
> 1) Seaside 2.8.4 is based on Pharo, not Squeak.
> Pharo is a fork or squeak. You can read more of pharo in the  
> website: http://www.pharo-project.org. This question, and all the  
> Pharo related, would be best to be asked in pharo mailing list. I  
> mean, you will get more answers there than here.

this sounds odd to me. Mariano—putting aside that Seaside is running  
on more smalltalks than the
squeak based—what makes you think that Squeak is not longer supported?  
Because that’s what
your statement is pointing to.
   I’d appreciate a comment form the developers on this topic.

So Long,
        -Tobias
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

> this sounds odd to me. Mariano—putting aside that Seaside is running on more
> smalltalks than the
> squeak based—what makes you think that Squeak is not longer supported?
> Because that’s what
> your statement is pointing to.
>  I’d appreciate a comment form the developers on this topic.

The Seaside development team mostly works in Pharo. To my knowledge,
the current code base for Seaside 2.8 and 2.9 runs in both Pharo and
Squeak. We don't happen to test Seaside on Squeak ourselves though. If
people want to use it in Squeak they need to step up, regularly run
the tests, provide feedback and fixes, and maybe at a later point
write a compatibility layer.

We promote the use and the portability of Seaside to all Smalltalk
platforms (Pharo, Squeak, GST, VisualWorks, GemStone, Dolphin, ...).
We do everything to make porting as easy as possible, but we do not
maintain ports ourselves. Porting is typically done by volunteering
users or the vendor of the particular platform.

Note that while the latest one-click image is based on Pharo, Seaside
2.8 was developed mostly in Squeak 3.9. The one-click image represents
my personal preference (and what I learned from the need of newbies
during numerous Seaside tutorials I gave) of a integrated Seaside
development environment.

Lukas

--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

Lukas Renggli wrote:
> We promote the use and the portability of Seaside to all Smalltalk
> platforms (Pharo, Squeak, GST, VisualWorks, GemStone, Dolphin, ...).
> We do everything to make porting as easy as possible, but we do not
> maintain ports ourselves. Porting is typically done by volunteering
> users or the vendor of the particular platform.

I think that's a very healthy attitude.

Cheers,
   - Andreas
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside