Hi!
Roassal has a new builder called RTDSM. It is currently very basic. Here is an example: dsm := RTDSM new. dsm objects: RTShape withAllSubclasses. dsm dependency: #dependentClasses. produces the following: ![]() Are there some algorithms to find an optimal ordering of the elements to display? Here is a slightly bigger matrix ![]() Cheers, Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi, This is great! I particularly liked the hovering. There are a couple of things that would be great to be extended: - The cells with no dependency are not particularly relevant, and they should appear transparent. Hovering can still remain. - The order has to be improved. To this end, take a look at the DSM work of Jannik. At the end, he extracted the algorithm in separate packages: Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Moose' project: 'DSM'; package: 'Moose-Algos-Dsm' package: 'Moose-Dsm-Core'; package: 'Moose-Dsm-Example'; package: 'Moose-Dsm-Famix'; load The code does not seem to work anymore in Moose 6.0, but it would be great to salvage at least the basics and add that into Moose-Algos (which ideally would become a prerequisite for Roassal :)). - We also need the cyclic information. Actually, adding cycles would be probably enough as an ordering. In Moose-Algos, we have the MalTarjan algorithm which is also the one used as a basis by the old DSM implementation of Jannik. You can see an example of it in: MooseGroup>>cyclesToAll: aBlockOrUnarySymbol This one allows you to have something like: aGroupOfClasses cyclesToAll: #clientClasses and you will get Collections of cyclic groups. - Once we have cyclic information, this has to appear on the diagram, and ideally it should be clickable to be able to dive into a cycle. What do you think? Cheers, Doru On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
I made them lighter. Before: ![]() Now: ![]() Indeed, looks better. I have tried with no color: ![]() But I kind of miss the directing lines.
Look exciting! However it appears to be more than a few minutes of coding. Next semester I will surely have some new students working with me. This will be a task. Cheers, Alexandre
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |