Consider this method
Object >> m
"
Object new m
"
#(1) do: [:n | ]; do: [:n | n halt].
You can debug it by executing the comment because of the halt. Now look at the debugger: the selection at the second line ([] in Object >>m) doens't look right. Does it? Note however that Hop, Skip and Jump would work well. So this is just a selection mistake. But might be misleading if the blocks had a lot of code inside.
Javier told me the solution, so I wrote a fix in this email, but then I remembered that the fix was in a hidden class. Therefore I removed the code from the email. Unfortunately my Delete key didn't work, so I had no option but to hide my code here instead of deleting it. At least I cannot see it here anymore. Can you? I hope no, because I did my best to keep it secret.
whoContains: position
| node |
(icStart isNil or: [icEnd isNil]) ifTrue: [^nil].
receiver isCascade
ifFalse: [(node := receiver whoContains: position) isNil ifFalse: [^node]].
arguments
do: [:arg | (node := arg whoContains: position) isNil ifFalse: [^node]].
(position between: icStart and: icEnd) ifFalse: [^nil].
^self
/Leandro
*** this signature added by listserv ***
*** Visit http://www.listserv.dfn.de/archives/vswe-l.html ***
*** for archive browsing and VSWE-L membership management ***
Locked
