Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

Debugger layout again

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Uko2

Debugger layout again

Hi again,

there is still no way to change the debugger layout to have it the same way as Moose… Why did we change layout in Pharo in the first place? It was so nice: you had the stack with the whole highlighting on the side, so you could see more.

Why do we have to make things unusable in Pharo?
Uko

P.S. ok, ok, I guess I will just move to Moose.

Tudor Girba-2

Re: Debugger layout again

Hi,

Even though the current default layout is not my preference, it is not unusable :).

But, let’s do it differently. Would you like to take a look at what it takes to build a debugger with your layout?

Cheers,
Doru

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> there is still no way to change the debugger layout to have it the same way as Moose… Why did we change layout in Pharo in the first place? It was so nice: you had the stack with the whole highlighting on the side, so you could see more.
>
> Why do we have to make things unusable in Pharo?
> Uko
>
> P.S. ok, ok, I guess I will just move to Moose.

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"Every thing has its own flow."

Uko2

Re: Debugger layout again

> On 27 Jan 2017, at 12:21, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Even though the current default layout is not my preference, it is not unusable :).

Ok, it’s not. But the other one was so nice :)

>
> But, let’s do it differently. Would you like to take a look at what it takes to build a debugger with your layout?

Yes I would. But after I figure out how to create tests & documentation simultaneously for quality rules with gtExamples :). Or I will make a small prototype of my own and then we will compare similarities with gtExamples. I think that quality rules are a really nice use case.

Cheers.
Uko

>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> there is still no way to change the debugger layout to have it the same way as Moose… Why did we change layout in Pharo in the first place? It was so nice: you had the stack with the whole highlighting on the side, so you could see more.
>>
>> Why do we have to make things unusable in Pharo?
>> Uko
>>
>> P.S. ok, ok, I guess I will just move to Moose.
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow."
>
>
>
>
>
>

Tudor Girba-2

Re: Debugger layout again

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 27 Jan 2017, at 12:21, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Even though the current default layout is not my preference, it is not unusable :).
>
> Ok, it’s not. But the other one was so nice :)
>
>
>>
>> But, let’s do it differently. Would you like to take a look at what it takes to build a debugger with your layout?
>
> Yes I would. But after I figure out how to create tests & documentation simultaneously for quality rules with gtExamples :). Or I will make a small prototype of my own and then we will compare similarities with gtExamples. I think that quality rules are a really nice use case.

You have a deal :). I am looking forward to your experience.

Doru

> Cheers.
> Uko
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> there is still no way to change the debugger layout to have it the same way as Moose… Why did we change layout in Pharo in the first place? It was so nice: you had the stack with the whole highlighting on the side, so you could see more.
>>>
>>> Why do we have to make things unusable in Pharo?
>>> Uko
>>>
>>> P.S. ok, ok, I guess I will just move to Moose.
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> www.feenk.com
>>
>> "Every thing has its own flow."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."

stepharong

Re: Debugger layout again

In reply to this post by Uko2

Why can't we have a spec like message to set the configurations people
like?

> Hi again,
>
> there is still no way to change the debugger layout to have it the same
> way as Moose… Why did we change layout in Pharo in the first place? It
> was so nice: you had the stack with the whole highlighting on the side,
> so you could see more.
>
> Why do we have to make things unusable in Pharo?
> Uko
>
> P.S. ok, ok, I guess I will just move to Moose.

--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/