Delete working copy

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Delete working copy

Bert Freudenberg
On 21.04.2011, at 14:23, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> On 21.04.2011, at 14:20, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
>> How do I delete my working copy without unloading it?
>
> Using the menu item right below "unload package".
>
> - Bert -

Perhaps we should relabel MC's "delete working copy" menu item? Many people seem to be unsure what it does.

How about "unregister package"? Or "forget package meta data"?

- Bert -



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Delete working copy

Tobias Pape

Am 2011-04-21 um 14:32 schrieb Bert Freudenberg:

> On 21.04.2011, at 14:23, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>> On 21.04.2011, at 14:20, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> How do I delete my working copy without unloading it?
>>
>> Using the menu item right below "unload package".
>>
>> - Bert -
>
> Perhaps we should relabel MC's "delete working copy" menu item? Many people seem to be unsure what it does.
>
> How about "unregister package"? Or "forget package meta data"?

+1

It puzzled me several times :)

So Long,
        -Tobias


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Delete working copy

Hannes Hirzel
+1

"delete working copy" might imply that actually code is deleted.

But there is as well 'unload package' and 'revert package'.

Balloon helps would be good.

"unregister package" and  "forget package meta data" are somehow not
too clear either.
Is there a registry somewhere?

BTW where is the most recent tutorial on using the Monticello Browser?

--Hannes

On 4/21/11, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Am 2011-04-21 um 14:32 schrieb Bert Freudenberg:
>
>> On 21.04.2011, at 14:23, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 21.04.2011, at 14:20, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>>> How do I delete my working copy without unloading it?
>>>
>>> Using the menu item right below "unload package".
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>>
>> Perhaps we should relabel MC's "delete working copy" menu item? Many
>> people seem to be unsure what it does.
>>
>> How about "unregister package"? Or "forget package meta data"?
>
> +1
>
> It puzzled me several times :)
>
> So Long,
> -Tobias
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Delete working copy

Tapple Gao
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> On 21.04.2011, at 14:23, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> > On 21.04.2011, at 14:20, David T. Lewis wrote:
> >
> >> How do I delete my working copy without unloading it?
> >
> > Using the menu item right below "unload package".
> >
> > - Bert -
>
> Perhaps we should relabel MC's "delete working copy" menu item? Many people seem to be unsure what it does.
>
> How about "unregister package"? Or "forget package meta data"?

In MC1.5, we changed the menu item to "remove package name from
list"

--
Matthew Fulmer (a.k.a. Tapple)

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Delete working copy

Chris Muller-3
In reply to this post by Hannes Hirzel
> "unregister package" and  "forget package meta data" are somehow not
> too clear either.
> Is there a registry somewhere?

Yes, it is:

  MCWorkingCopy allManagers

So, I think "unregister" is a good choice because that word reveals
that it removes the "entry" and not anything else.  Just MHO..   :-)

  - Chris

>
> BTW where is the most recent tutorial on using the Monticello Browser?
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 4/21/11, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Am 2011-04-21 um 14:32 schrieb Bert Freudenberg:
>>
>>> On 21.04.2011, at 14:23, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 21.04.2011, at 14:20, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How do I delete my working copy without unloading it?
>>>>
>>>> Using the menu item right below "unload package".
>>>>
>>>> - Bert -
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should relabel MC's "delete working copy" menu item? Many
>>> people seem to be unsure what it does.
>>>
>>> How about "unregister package"? Or "forget package meta data"?
>>
>> +1
>>
>> It puzzled me several times :)
>>
>> So Long,
>>       -Tobias
>>
>>
>>
>
>