Dictionary>>do: changed - why when where ?

> I noticed a change of Dictionary>>do: now defined in term of associationsDo:
> The change seems rooted at:
>
> Name: Collections-Unordered-TristanBourgois.84
> Author: TristanBourgois
> Time: 10 May 2010, 10:44:10 am
> UUID: 0252ec21-211a-4c03-a29b-209cdc6cecd2
> Ancestors: Collections-Unordered-TristanBourgois.81
>
> I change methods do: and associationsDo: for compatibility for
> inheritance between HashedCollection and Dictionary
>
> Where can I find related issue with a bit of rationale ?
>
> Nicolas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

> On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>
>> I noticed a change of Dictionary>>do: now defined in term of associationsDo:
>> The change seems rooted at:
>>
>> Name: Collections-Unordered-TristanBourgois.84
>> Author: TristanBourgois
>> Time: 10 May 2010, 10:44:10 am
>> UUID: 0252ec21-211a-4c03-a29b-209cdc6cecd2
>> Ancestors: Collections-Unordered-TristanBourgois.81
>>
>> I change methods do: and associationsDo: for compatibility for
>> inheritance between HashedCollection and Dictionary
>>
>> Where can I find related issue with a bit of rationale ?
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

> 2010/6/23 Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:
>> this is probably a mistake when we integrated hashedCollection.
>> If you have a better idea we are happy to hear it.
>>
>> Stef
>
> I suggest ^self valuesDo: aBlock like it always did.
>
> Nicolas
>
>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed a change of Dictionary>>do: now defined in term of associationsDo:
>>> The change seems rooted at:
>>>
>>> Name: Collections-Unordered-TristanBourgois.84
>>> Author: TristanBourgois
>>> Time: 10 May 2010, 10:44:10 am
>>> UUID: 0252ec21-211a-4c03-a29b-209cdc6cecd2
>>> Ancestors: Collections-Unordered-TristanBourgois.81
>>>
>>> I change methods do: and associationsDo: for compatibility for
>>> inheritance between HashedCollection and Dictionary
>>>
>>> Where can I find related issue with a bit of rationale ?
>>>
>>> Nicolas
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project