I imagine that people did not pay attention.
I think that this is important that we polish even the "details".
Today I did a lecture and students got excited by Smalltalk the
concept and I would love that they
get excited by Smalltalk the implementation. This is why beauty in the
details is important.
So if you have a fix and some tests :)
Stef
On May 26, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
> While taking a look at Seaside issue 262 I noticed that
>
> SmartRefStream>>catalogValues: instVarList size: varsOnDisk
>
> creates a Dictionary with the default size, while having a pretty
> good idea of how large it should at least be. Is this called so
> little that that it doesn't matter?(it is only called in
> SmartRefStream>>readInsanceSize:clsname:refPosn:)
>
> Stephan Eggermont
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Locked
