Because now when I load pillar
Metacello new baseline: 'Pillar'; repository: 'github://pillar-markup/pillar:newpipeline/src'; load I get an error because Magritte-MOrph-SeasnDeNigris.95 is not found So I cannot build pillar anymore! :( |
Administrator
|
Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote
> So I cannot build pillar anymore! What Pharo/OS? Your script seems to work on #60540 on High Sierra. Did you disable Iceberg shared repos? I usually forget to do that ;) ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Cheers,
Sean |
Hi sean
I have the impression that this is related to a hiccup of smalltalkhub. I'm about to get rid of Magritte in Pillar. After I will finish the book tutorial on tinyblog and I will work on magritte. Stef On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: > Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote >> So I cannot build pillar anymore! > > What Pharo/OS? Your script seems to work on #60540 on High Sierra. Did you > disable Iceberg shared repos? I usually forget to do that ;) > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > |
Administrator
|
Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote
> I will work on magritte. Great, have a look at my fork [1], which contains many enhancements. I didn't port them back to the main library because they are only known to work in Pharo, I don't know of anyone maintaining from the Squeak side, and I didn't want to break it. 1. https://github.com/seandenigris/Magritte3 ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Cheers,
Sean |
Ok when I will do a pass I will have a look. My goal is to improve for Pharo.
Stef On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:50 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: > Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote >> I will work on magritte. > > Great, have a look at my fork [1], which contains many enhancements. I > didn't port them back to the main library because they are only known to > work in Pharo, I don't know of anyone maintaining from the Squeak side, and > I didn't want to break it. > > 1. https://github.com/seandenigris/Magritte3 > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > |
Is this the canonical repo? I'm still depending on the version in SmalltalkHub. Thanks, Peter On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: Ok when I will do a pass I will have a look. My goal is to improve for Pharo. |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Stephane Ducasse-3
Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote
> Ok when I will do a pass I will have a look. My goal is to improve for > Pharo. At some point we should do a spike to see how we would implement today now that we have slots. While we're on the subject, I was thinking that for less-than-trival slot layouts, the class definition will start to grow to a very-non-smalltalkish length. Have we thought at all about that and how to maybe present it in more manageable chunks? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Cheers,
Sean |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
Peter Uhnák wrote
> Is this the canonical repo? I'm still depending on the version in > SmalltalkHub. I would say it's a judgement call because the original author is no longer active in the community. I originally was pushing all my fixes to the StHub repo, but I started to break the Squeak CI builds, so I forked and made many significant enhancements since. I always depend on my fork and use it in most of my projects, both personal and production. I would say that there is no downside as long as one is using it in Pharo exclusively. I would guess it wouldn't be super complicated to fix for Squeak and sync everything, but so far no one has voiced a need. ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Cheers,
Sean |
Hi Sean,
> On Apr 8, 2018, at 6:04 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Peter Uhnák wrote >> Is this the canonical repo? I'm still depending on the version in >> SmalltalkHub. > > I would say it's a judgement call because the original author is no longer > active in the community. I originally was pushing all my fixes to the StHub > repo, but I started to break the Squeak CI builds, so I forked and made many > significant enhancements since. I always depend on my fork and use it in > most of my projects, both personal and production. I would say that there is > no downside as long as one is using it in Pharo exclusively. I would guess > it wouldn't be super complicated to fix for Squeak and sync everything, but > so far no one has voiced a need. If it is possible and not too onerous then the courtesy would be appreciated. > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > |
Administrator
|
Eliot Miranda-2 wrote
> If it is possible and not too onerous then the courtesy would be > appreciated. I would be happy to. The issue is that, since most of my private projects are in Pharo, I won't know/see bugs. I think the only way for this to happen is if someone starts actively using it in Squeak and reporting bugs and we can work together to iron out any issues. ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Cheers,
Sean |
In reply to this post by Peter Uhnak
I will create one, because at the end I was the guy that showed the
moose meta model to lukas and pushed him when he started to work on Magritte. (magritte description described in themselves and general design are lukas ideas). Stef On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote: > Is this the canonical repo? I'm still depending on the version in > SmalltalkHub. > > Thanks, > Peter > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> >> Ok when I will do a pass I will have a look. My goal is to improve for >> Pharo. >> >> Stef >> >> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:50 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> > Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote >> >> I will work on magritte. >> > >> > Great, have a look at my fork [1], which contains many enhancements. I >> > didn't port them back to the main library because they are only known to >> > work in Pharo, I don't know of anyone maintaining from the Squeak side, >> > and >> > I didn't want to break it. >> > >> > 1. https://github.com/seandenigris/Magritte3 >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- >> > Cheers, >> > Sean >> > -- >> > Sent from: >> > http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >> > >> > |
Administrator
|
Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote
> I will create one There is https://github.com/magritte-metamodel/magritte which I forked from. I wonder if we can make that canonical. It would be easy for me to sync my changes back and from the README, it appears that most other Smalltalk load Magritte from elsewhere. Regarding Sqeak, there are the mcz repos, and IFAICT Squeak has not shown much interest in git, so we're probably safe there. Either way, please coordinate with me because the StHub repo is waaaay behind my fork… ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Cheers,
Sean |
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: Stephane Ducasse-3 wrote Yes I guess, this is better to reuse existing org on github. Sean or me can invite people. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (SU/IRD/UY1)
|
My roadmap is the following: - release Pillar 70 alpha (we made really nice progress) - work and release the tinyblog book - then work on magritte I will ping you when I arrive at this point. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Serge Stinckwich <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |