On 11-09-17 11:18, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM, stephan
> <
[hidden email]
> <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
> This looks like it is missing directories.
> On the other hand, perhaps exposing the build steps as directories
> might not be the best idea, as that is unlikely to remain stable.
>
http://files.pharo.org/image/70/ <
http://files.pharo.org/image/70/>
>
>
> Yeh, also so far people will use mostly the latest minimal and full
> images. All intermediate steps are stored just because we can.
>
> But if you have some idea/proposal on how to enhance it, we could do it
Indeed, I also assume most people will be looking for either the minimal
or the full image, in either 32 or 64 bit. Would it be better to add a
subdirectory for the (intermediary) build steps?
Stephan