Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

stepharo


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

Esteban A. Maringolo
If Swazoo is available, I guess Sport will be too because it depends on it.

Regards!

Esteban A. Maringolo

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

Stephan Eggermont-3
In reply to this post by stepharo
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

stepharo
Thanks

Le 10/11/15 01:43, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Sport/Sport
>
> Stephan
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

Stephan Eggermont-3
On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
> Thanks

I assume you want it working in Pharo5?
There was no #'pharo5.x'

Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16
Author: StephanEggermont
Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am
UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f
Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15

In-place pharo5 version added



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

stepharo
thanks!


Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :

> On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
>> Thanks
>
> I assume you want it working in Pharo5?
> There was no #'pharo5.x'
>
> Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16
> Author: StephanEggermont
> Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am
> UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f
> Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
>
> In-place pharo5 version added
>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

kilon.alios
anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
thanks!


Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
> On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
>> Thanks
>
> I assume you want it working in Pharo5?
> There was no #'pharo5.x'
>
> Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16
> Author: StephanEggermont
> Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am
> UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f
> Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
>
> In-place pharo5 version added
>
>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>

Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:27, Dimitris Chloupis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help.
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
> thanks!
>
>
> Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
> > On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
> >> Thanks
> >
> > I assume you want it working in Pharo5?
> > There was no #'pharo5.x'
> >
> > Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16
> > Author: StephanEggermont
> > Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am
> > UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f
> > Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
> >
> > In-place pharo5 version added
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

kilon.alios
Thank you Sven that clears it up for me, sounds interesting project :)

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:40 PM Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
<< Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>

Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:27, Dimitris Chloupis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help.
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
> thanks!
>
>
> Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
> > On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
> >> Thanks
> >
> > I assume you want it working in Pharo5?
> > There was no #'pharo5.x'
> >
> > Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16
> > Author: StephanEggermont
> > Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am
> > UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f
> > Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
> >
> > In-place pharo5 version added
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

stepharo
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
I would like to see what is needed and if we can improve Pharo libraries :)


Le 10/11/15 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :

> << Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
>
> Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
>
>> On 10 Nov 2015, at 21:27, Dimitris Chloupis <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> anyone care to explain what Sport is , the project description does not help.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> thanks!
>>
>>
>> Le 10/11/15 10:03, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
>>> On 10-11-15 08:00, stepharo wrote:
>>>> Thanks
>>> I assume you want it working in Pharo5?
>>> There was no #'pharo5.x'
>>>
>>> Name: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.16
>>> Author: StephanEggermont
>>> Time: 10 November 2015, 10:01:56.039515 am
>>> UUID: 0c712020-3d22-405b-9842-3106b6b9721f
>>> Ancestors: ConfigurationOfSPort2-StephanEggermont.15
>>>
>>> In-place pharo5 version added
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

demarey
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2

Le 10 nov. 2015 à 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :

> << Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
>
> Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).

Any reason to prefer one or the other?

smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

Frank Shearar-3
On 12 November 2015 at 09:04, Christophe Demarey
<[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Le 10 nov. 2015 à 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
>
>> << Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
>>
>> Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
>
> Any reason to prefer one or the other?

While they're both compatibility layers, Grease is a portability layer
_for Seaside_, while Sport is a portability layer for time, sockets,
and files.

frank

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does anybody know if Sport is available in Pharo?

demarey

Le 12 nov. 2015 à 10:15, Frank Shearar a écrit :

> On 12 November 2015 at 09:04, Christophe Demarey
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Le 10 nov. 2015 à 21:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
>>
>>> << Sport is a Smalltalk portability layer. Sport presents a consistent interface and implemented in a number of Smalltalk dialects. Smalltalk code written to the Sport interfaces can be run in any Smalltalk dialect without alteration. >>
>>>
>>> Anyway, that was the idea some years ago. It is somewhat comparable to Grease (used by Seaside).
>>
>> Any reason to prefer one or the other?
>
> While they're both compatibility layers, Grease is a portability layer
> _for Seaside_, while Sport is a portability layer for time, sockets,
> and files.
ok, thanks

smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment