I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1
http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html [ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ] Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well. I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback. To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent. The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo It feels as if more could be said about Dev. I also tried to stick with just a simple screenshot, I could come up with more complicated ones, but we cannot put everything on one screenshot. Sven |
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1 > > http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html > > [ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ] > > Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well. Great Sven, maybe you could put this information on the wiki so the people could modify it more easily. > I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback. > > To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent. > > The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo > > It feels as if more could be said about Dev. Stéphane already suggest to look at all the issues solved during 1.2: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone=1.2 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=Milestone%3D1.2-DevImage The related issues could be added before the description of the changes: #2943, #3036 SUnit 4 integration For future releases, i guess a semi-automatic changelog could be done with the list of issues. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/ |
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Serge Stinckwich
<[hidden email]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: >> I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1 >> >> http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html >> >> [ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ] >> >> Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well. > > Great Sven, maybe you could put this information on the wiki so the > people could modify it more easily. > >> I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback. >> >> To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent. >> >> The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo >> >> It feels as if more could be said about Dev. > > Stéphane already suggest to look at all the issues solved during 1.2: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone=1.2 > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=Milestone%3D1.2-DevImage > > The related issues could be added before the description of the changes: > #2943, #3036 SUnit 4 integration > > For future releases, i guess a semi-automatic changelog could be done > with the list of issues. This is quite difficult now to know exactly from the list of issues which one have been integrated effectively in 1.2 or not. Some issues are closed, some other are their fix/enhancements integrated in the image. Maybe for future releases, when a fix/enhancements is accepted, the issue could be tagged with a label like : in1.3 The idea is to be able to extract the list of updates directly from issues. What do you think about that ? Regards -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/ |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1 Cool ! I will do a french translation this evening.
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 Cheers,
Laurent.
|
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > Remarks: > - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... > - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version. More comments ? Sven |
Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues.
Is there an easy why to know this? cheers mariano On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com |
On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. > Is there an easy why to know this? Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that. Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal size/importance. If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ? |
In reply to this post by laurent laffont
On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:19, laurent laffont wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > > > Remarks: > > - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... > > - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. > > For more publicity we can have a word on the new success stories: Inceptive ERP, Issys tracking and DrGeo in http://www.pharo-project.org/about/success-stories > > Laurent. > > > More comments ? > > Sven OK, I added a paragraph 'Success Stories', have a look: http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html Are the download links correct ?? Sven |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. The bug tracker can be queried for issues of a certain tag: 57 for Full: and 693 for Core: For all versions, we had 3960 issue tracker submissions, out of which 473 are open. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
Just a little note. #12345 is not the number of issues, but for updates. If we take that every update has an average o 3 integrated issues, then the amount of issues should be something like 1000 :) (345 * 3) -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
ahaha I thought revision #12345 was a dummy number :)
Laurent
|
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe
Thanks, Sven
That's a great summary! Adrian On Apr 4, 2011, at 23:01 , Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1 > > http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html > > [ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ] > > Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well. > > I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback. > > To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent. > > The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo > > It feels as if more could be said about Dev. > > I also tried to stick with just a simple screenshot, I could come up with more complicated ones, but we cannot put everything on one screenshot. > > Sven > > > |
In reply to this post by laurent laffont
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, laurent laffont <[hidden email]> wrote:
NOO, it was MAGIC! We CANNOT not release this image....that number means something :)
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
On 05 Apr 2011, at 10:22, Marcus Denker wrote: > The bug tracker can be queried for issues of a certain tag: > > 57 for Full: > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone%3D1.2-DevImage > and 693 for Core: > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone%3D1.2 I added these numbers as well as links to these issue tracker queries. I also added a link to your email announcing #12345 so that people can see we are not just making this up. |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 19AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > >> Remarks: >> - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... >> - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version. > > More comments ? > > Sven I would remove the SimpleMorphic mention, or at least add a disclaimer to it that it's more like a preview of what direction Morphic will be heading in, rather than something people should use, and can expect to work and/or stay in the base image. Cheers, Henry |
On 05 Apr 2011, at 11:19, Henrik Johansen wrote: > I would remove the SimpleMorphic mention, or at least add a disclaimer to it that it's more like a preview of what direction Morphic will be heading in, rather than something people should use, and can expect to work and/or stay in the base image. I'll phrase it as 'Included SimpleMorphic preview' then. |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe
I ill have a look when I get a little moment.
Stef On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > >> Remarks: >> - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... >> - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version. > > More comments ? > > Sven |
I'm currently translating into french.
I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk" Can someone explain ? Laurent On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: I ill have a look when I get a little moment. |
On 05 Apr 2011, at 20:41, laurent laffont wrote: > I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk" Me neither ;-) > Can someone explain ? Maybe this should be rephrased ? |
In reply to this post by laurent laffont
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:41 PM, laurent laffont wrote: > I'm currently translating into french. > > I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk" Better support for the introduction of SmalltalkImage and SystemDictionary separation. > > Can someone explain ? > > Laurent > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > I ill have a look when I get a little moment. > > Stef > > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > > > >> Remarks: > >> - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... > >> - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version. > > > > More comments ? > > > > Sven > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |