Thanks David,
I will dive into it
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 19 Mar 2009, at 10:14, David Röthlisberger wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>> Each OBNode understand the message definition. In the first version
>> of
>> OB, this definition method is supposed to return an instance of
>> OBDefinition or one of its subclass.
>> I saw a way to have a graphical object instead of the text pane. What
>> is the trick to achieve this?
>
> What I did is to use OBClosableDefinitionPanel that has an
> #exchangeContentWith:
> aMorph method where you can pass any morph that gets displayed
> instead of the text
> that is usually there.
> We could extend that to be able to also use "visualization
> definitions" directly in
> OBNode, but I haven't yet done this. The visualizations I added get
> displayed on the
> execution of a command, by default there is always a text definition
> shown that can
> get exchanged with a visualization at runtime.
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project