>
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck
> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Romain Robbes <
[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This one of the tests that were inherited from ECompletion I believe ...
>>> I don't really know what to do with them.
>>>
>>> Same for your other email actually, although I seem to remember it
>>> used to take a normal amount of time, maybe the implementation of some
>>> method changed for the worse?
>>
>> I remember there was some slowdown in certain type of collections in Pharo
>> 1.1. I don't know if hashed, or sorted, weak...I don't know.
>> Maybe it is something related to that?
>
> Ups...sorry this answer was to the other email..the one of the time...
>
> for this one, I have no idea. MAybe just chaning it to 80 is ok :)
>
> Or maybe Lukas can explain us.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mariano
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Romain
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck
>>> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > This fails where it does:
>>> >
>>> > self assert: count == model entries size.
>>> > self assert: count > 100.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > since model entries size -> 85
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Of course, if I change the test to
>>> >
>>> > self assert: count == model entries size.
>>> > self assert: count > 80.
>>> >
>>> > it works :)
>>> >
>>> > Romain ?
>>> >
>>> > thanks
>>> >
>>> > mariano
>>> >
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>
Locked
