Hello,
I have some assorted questions about the WebElement hierarchy and how to use it properly. As far as I understand, every domain object that want to be displayed through a RESTful URI must have a corresponding WebApplication subclass (e.g. MyModelApp). But what happens if I want to factorize my views, so I can have an "embeddable" view of MyModelApp? Can I do this? Should I build a subclass of WebElement, and then use such WebElement in MyModelApp? Eg. Models: ContainerModel ElementModel Applications: ContainerModelApp ElementModelApp Each object will have a RESTful URI, and will end being redirected to its corresponding App, let's say ContainerModelApp, which will include a site navigation bar, other stuff, and the ContainerModel view itself. What I want to do is: A. Factorize the raw view of the ContainerModel, in order to be able to embed it in another App. B. Embed a small/different view of ElementModelApp in ContainerModelApp (e.g. a table row view, or some tile-like view). I don't see a clear distinction between WebElement and WebApplication, except for the fact that WebApplication includes some methods to define page title and stuff at a "page" level. Best regards, -- Esteban Esteban A. Maringolo _______________________________________________ Aida mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida |
Hi Esteban,
I hope you didn't give up waiting for an answer so long. Sorry! Answers are below. Esteban A. Maringolo wrote: > I have some assorted questions about the WebElement hierarchy and how > to use it properly. > > As far as I understand, every domain object that want to be displayed > through a RESTful URI must have a corresponding WebApplication > subclass (e.g. MyModelApp). Exactly > But what happens if I want to factorize my views, so I can have an > "embeddable" view of MyModelApp? > Can I do this? Not a view embeddable into another view, but any element can of course be embedded into another element, on the same App. For reusable cross-app elements you subclass a WebComponent. Prime example for such reusable, standalone, highly useful component is WebGrid. > Should I build a subclass of WebElement, and then use such WebElement > in MyModelApp? Exactly. Even better: subclass a WebComponent, because you'll get even more standalone and Ajax-ified component at the end. And WebComponents will be greatly enhanced in the future. See again WebGrid for example. > Eg. > Models: > ContainerModel > ElementModel > > Applications: > ContainerModelApp > ElementModelApp > > Each object will have a RESTful URI, and will end being redirected to > its corresponding App, let's say ContainerModelApp, which will include > a site navigation bar, other stuff, and the ContainerModel view > itself. In this case you better make an App class hierarchy accordingly: WebApplication ContainerModelApp ElementModelApp > What I want to do is: > A. Factorize the raw view of the ContainerModel, in order to be able > to embed it in another App. > B. Embed a small/different view of ElementModelApp in > ContainerModelApp (e.g. a table row view, or some tile-like view). > > I don't see a clear distinction between WebElement and WebApplication, > except for the fact that WebApplication includes some methods to > define page title and stuff at a "page" level. This is the distinction, yes. WebApplication is for a whole web page, it is therefore a root of a whole element hierarchy of that page. You couldn't therefore embed a whole page in another page (but even that works:). As said the standalone subclasses of WebElement/WebComponent are meant for such embedding as you'd like to achieve. Another way is WebApp subclass hierarchy. Yet another way is iframe inside a page, but this sounds a bit hacky for your case. Best regards Janko -- Janko Mivšek AIDA/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si _______________________________________________ Aida mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida |
Janko:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 17:10, Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Esteban, > > I hope you didn't give up waiting for an answer so long. Sorry! > Answers are below. No prob, it has been holidays season here too. Didn't touch a computer for a while :-) Everything is as I understood it. Now let's code. Thanks for your support. Best regards, Esteban A. Maringolo _______________________________________________ Aida mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.aidaweb.si/mailman/listinfo/aida |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |