FAMIXFunction>>packageScope is missing
Locked
 
|
Hi!
We are importing C++ code in Moose and are bumping into problem when using Chef. packageScope is missing on FAMIXFunction. We could have something like: FAMIXFunction>>packageScope ^ self declatedType ifNotNil: [ self declatedType packageScope ] ifNil: [ nil ] Any better idea? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: FAMIXFunction>>packageScope is missing
|
|
*scope methods are supposed to return a scope of the entity, and not a dependency. Declared type is a dependency, so it does not fit the purpose.
But, how are you importing c++? Cheers, Doru On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:21, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi! > > We are importing C++ code in Moose and are bumping into problem when using Chef. > packageScope is missing on FAMIXFunction. We could have something like: > > FAMIXFunction>>packageScope > ^ self declatedType > ifNotNil: [ self declatedType packageScope ] > ifNil: [ nil ] > > Any better idea? > > Cheers, > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: FAMIXFunction>>packageScope is missing
|
|
We are importing MSE files generated with inFusion.
Cheers, Santiago
2011/12/9 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> *scope methods are supposed to return a scope of the entity, and not a dependency. Declared type is a dependency, so it does not fit the purpose. Santiago Vidal _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
> *scope methods are supposed to return a scope of the entity, and not a dependency. Declared type is a dependency, so it does not fit the purpose.
I inspired myself from: FAMIXMethod>>packageScope ^ self parentPackage ifNil:[ |cl| cl := self parentType. cl isNil ifTrue:[nil] ifFalse:[cl packageScope] ] So, what the definition of FAMIXFunction>>packageScope should look like? Cheers, Alexandre > > > > On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:21, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> We are importing C++ code in Moose and are bumping into problem when using Chef. >> packageScope is missing on FAMIXFunction. We could have something like: >> >> FAMIXFunction>>packageScope >> ^ self declatedType >> ifNotNil: [ self declatedType packageScope ] >> ifNil: [ nil ] >> >> Any better idea? >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Re: FAMIXFunction>>packageScope is missing
|
|
Hi,
On 9 Dec 2011, at 19:41, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> *scope methods are supposed to return a scope of the entity, and not a dependency. Declared type is a dependency, so it does not fit the purpose. > > I inspired myself from: > > FAMIXMethod>>packageScope > > ^ self parentPackage ifNil:[ > |cl| > cl := self parentType. > cl isNil > ifTrue:[nil] > ifFalse:[cl packageScope] > ] But, this is completely not the same as what you proposed for function. packageScope returns the parentPackage of the parent class. If you look for the parentPackage of what the function returns, you end up in a completely different place. > So, what the definition of FAMIXFunction>>packageScope should look like? There is no notion of packageScope for a Function, so it should return nil in this case. Cheers, Doru > Cheers, > Alexandre > >> >> >> >> On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:21, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> We are importing C++ code in Moose and are bumping into problem when using Chef. >>> packageScope is missing on FAMIXFunction. We could have something like: >>> >>> FAMIXFunction>>packageScope >>> ^ self declatedType >>> ifNotNil: [ self declatedType packageScope ] >>> ifNil: [ nil ] >>> >>> Any better idea? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com Innovation comes in least expected form. That is, if it is expected, it already happened. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
>> So, what the definition of FAMIXFunction>>packageScope should look like?
> > There is no notion of packageScope for a Function, so it should return nil in this case. I added -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= FAMIXFunction>>packageScope "No package scope for functions" ^ nil -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= in Famix-Core-AlexandreBergel.188 This could always be adjusted in the future when one need to analyze languages that has scoped function (e.g., Racket) Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |