Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Users

FFI syntax

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Torsten Bergmann

FFI syntax

>I can not even find up to date information on how to *install* current
>working FFI

In Pharo 3.0 open the world menu, then "Tools", then "Config browser"
and there look for "FFI" in the list ...

If people would care on providing easy access to own packages
life would be easy for all.

Bye
T.

Nicolai Hess

Re: FFI syntax

Yes, for pharo this is easy.
For squeak, it took me some time to get it "working" (at least the tests are green, examples do not work).

2014-10-16 8:49 GMT+02:00 Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]>:

>I can not even find up to date information on how to *install* current
>working FFI

In Pharo 3.0 open the world menu, then "Tools", then "Config browser"
and there look for "FFI" in the list ...

If people would care on providing easy access to own packages
life would be easy for all.

Bye
T.

philippeback

Re: FFI syntax

In reply to this post by Torsten Bergmann

I can push RFB in there as it seems to be missing.

Phil

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

>I can not even find up to date information on how to *install* current
>working FFI

In Pharo 3.0 open the world menu, then "Tools", then "Config browser"
and there look for "FFI" in the list ...

If people would care on providing easy access to own packages
life would be easy for all.

Bye
T.

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2

Re: FFI syntax

But only if it loads and works cleanly in that version of Pharo, we need a minimum of quality assurance.

On 16 Oct 2014, at 10:26, [hidden email] wrote:

>
> I can push RFB in there as it seems to be missing.
>
> Phil
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >I can not even find up to date information on how to *install* current
> >working FFI
>
> In Pharo 3.0 open the world menu, then "Tools", then "Config browser"
> and there look for "FFI" in the list ...
>
> If people would care on providing easy access to own packages
> life would be easy for all.
>
> Bye
> T.
>
>
>

philippeback

Re: FFI syntax

Works fine here with TightVNC.

Worked all evening on a remote box that was quite far in FullHD.

I noticed some missing keybindings (numeric pad for example). But that's because the supported mappings in RFB are incomplete, not because of bugs.

Phil