FW: EyeSee license

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

FW: EyeSee license

Peter Goessaert

Hello Moose developers,

 

Trying this list, because it looks like [hidden email] is not so actively read ;-)

 

This was my question:

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

Is this correct?

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

 

All answers or pointers to the correct people are welcome.

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T +32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


From: Peter Goessaert
Sent: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 11:38
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: EyeSee license

 

Hello,

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

Is this correct?

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: EyeSee license

stepharo

Hello Moose developers,

 

Trying this list, because it looks like [hidden email] is not so actively read ;-)

:)

 

This was my question:

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.


Excellent!

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

I thought that all the Moose Components where BSD (but the impact is the same). With BSD and MIT you can do what you want to
the code (but should mentioned the original license).

Is this correct?

Normally BSD. Pharo is MIT, Moose BSD.
You can also improve it and give back the enhancements to the community :)

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

I would say where it is simple for you and for people to know it.
May be in a about.

All answers or pointers to the correct people are welcome.

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T +32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


From: Peter Goessaert
Sent: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 11:38
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: EyeSee license

 

Hello,

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

Is this correct?

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: EyeSee license

Tudor Girba-2
Hi,

We are happy to see you interested.

Are you asking about the VW or the Pharo version of EyeSee?

Cheers,
Doru



On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello Moose developers,

 

Trying this list, because it looks like [hidden email] is not so actively read ;-)

:)

 

This was my question:

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.


Excellent!


But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

I thought that all the Moose Components where BSD (but the impact is the same). With BSD and MIT you can do what you want to
the code (but should mentioned the original license).

Is this correct?

Normally BSD. Pharo is MIT, Moose BSD.
You can also improve it and give back the enhancements to the community :)


And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

I would say where it is simple for you and for people to know it.
May be in a about.

All answers or pointers to the correct people are welcome.

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T <a href="tel:%2B32%202%20467%2034%2030" value="+3224673430" target="_blank">+32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


From: Peter Goessaert
Sent: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 11:38
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: EyeSee license

 

Hello,

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

Is this correct?

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: EyeSee license

stepharo

We are happy to see you interested.

Are you asking about the VW or the Pharo version of EyeSee?

probably the VW I forgot.

Stef


Cheers,
Doru



On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello Moose developers,

 

Trying this list, because it looks like [hidden email] is not so actively read ;-)

:)

 

This was my question:

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.


Excellent!


But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

I thought that all the Moose Components where BSD (but the impact is the same). With BSD and MIT you can do what you want to
the code (but should mentioned the original license).

Is this correct?

Normally BSD. Pharo is MIT, Moose BSD.
You can also improve it and give back the enhancements to the community :)


And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

I would say where it is simple for you and for people to know it.
May be in a about.

All answers or pointers to the correct people are welcome.

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B32%202%20467%2034%2030" value="+3224673430" target="_blank">+32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


From: Peter Goessaert
Sent: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 11:38
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: EyeSee license

 

Hello,

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

Is this correct?

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--

"Every thing has its own flow"


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: EyeSee license

Peter Goessaert

Indeed.

VW 7.9 to be specific.

 

Thanks for the answers so far!

 

One question still open: what is the exact text we should add in our about?

Is that something like

“We use EyeSee from Moose Technology” with a pointer to http://www.moosetechnology.org, or should that contain more information/links/contact information to Moose or Bern university?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of stepharo
Sent: woensdag 2 juli 2014 11:19
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: FW: EyeSee license

 



We are happy to see you interested.

 

Are you asking about the VW or the Pharo version of EyeSee?


probably the VW I forgot.

Stef


 

Cheers,

Doru

 

 

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:



Hello Moose developers,

 

Trying this list, because it looks like [hidden email] is not so actively read ;-)

:)


 

This was my question:

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

 

Excellent!




But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

I thought that all the Moose Components where BSD (but the impact is the same). With BSD and MIT you can do what you want to
the code (but should mentioned the original license).

Is this correct?

Normally BSD. Pharo is MIT, Moose BSD.
You can also improve it and give back the enhancements to the community :)




And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

I would say where it is simple for you and for people to know it.
May be in a about.


All answers or pointers to the correct people are welcome.

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T <a href="tel:%2B32%202%20467%2034%2030" target="_blank">+32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

 

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.

 

From: Peter Goessaert
Sent: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 11:38
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: EyeSee license

 

Hello,

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

Is this correct?

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

 


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



 

--

 

"Every thing has its own flow"




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

 


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: EyeSee license

abergel
Hello Peter,

GraphET is available on VW. GraphET is a revamp of EyeSee.

Cheers,
Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Jul 2, 2014, at 5:51 AM, Peter Goessaert <[hidden email]> wrote:

Indeed.
VW 7.9 to be specific.
 
Thanks for the answers so far!
 
One question still open: what is the exact text we should add in our about?
Is that something like
“We use EyeSee from Moose Technology” with a pointer to http://www.moosetechnology.org, or should that contain more information/links/contact information to Moose or Bern university?
 
Greetings,
Peter
 
 
From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of stepharo
Sent: woensdag 2 juli 2014 11:19
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: FW: EyeSee license
 


We are happy to see you interested.
 
Are you asking about the VW or the Pharo version of EyeSee?

probably the VW I forgot.

Stef


 
Cheers,
Doru
 

 

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:


Hello Moose developers,
 
Trying this list, because it looks like [hidden email] is not so actively read ;-)
:)


 
This was my question:
 
The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.
 
Excellent!



But first some license questions need an answer.
 
As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.
I thought that all the Moose Components where BSD (but the impact is the same). With BSD and MIT you can do what you want to 
the code (but should mentioned the original license).

Is this correct?
Normally BSD. Pharo is MIT, Moose BSD.
You can also improve it and give back the enhancements to the community :)



And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?
I would say where it is simple for you and for people to know it. 
May be in a about.


All answers or pointers to the correct people are welcome.

Greetings,
Peter
 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T <a href="tel:%2B32%202%20467%2034%2030" target="_blank" style="color: purple; text-decoration: underline;">+32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

<image001.png>

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.

 
From: Peter Goessaert 
Sent: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 11:38
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: EyeSee license
 
Hello,
 
The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.
But first some license questions need an answer.
 
As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.
Is this correct?
And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?
 
Greetings,
Peter
 
 


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
 


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



 
--
 
"Every thing has its own flow"



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
 
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: EyeSee license

Peter Goessaert

| GraphET is available on VW. GraphET is a revamp of EyeSee.

 

Aha, thanks for that tip, Alexandre!

 

p.

 

 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T +32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.


From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alexandre Bergel
Sent: woensdag 2 juli 2014 15:54
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: FW: EyeSee license

 

Hello Peter,

 

GraphET is available on VW. GraphET is a revamp of EyeSee.

 

Cheers,

Alexandre

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



 

On Jul 2, 2014, at 5:51 AM, Peter Goessaert <[hidden email]> wrote:



Indeed.

VW 7.9 to be specific.

 

Thanks for the answers so far!

 

One question still open: what is the exact text we should add in our about?

Is that something like

“We use EyeSee from Moose Technology” with a pointer to http://www.moosetechnology.org, or should that contain more information/links/contact information to Moose or Bern university?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of stepharo
Sent: woensdag 2 juli 2014 11:19
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: FW: EyeSee license

 




We are happy to see you interested.

 

Are you asking about the VW or the Pharo version of EyeSee?


probably the VW I forgot.

Stef



 

Cheers,

Doru

 

 

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:00 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:




Hello Moose developers,

 

Trying this list, because it looks like [hidden email] is not so actively read ;-)

:)



 

This was my question:

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

 

Excellent!





But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

I thought that all the Moose Components where BSD (but the impact is the same). With BSD and MIT you can do what you want to 
the code (but should mentioned the original license).


Is this correct?

Normally BSD. Pharo is MIT, Moose BSD.
You can also improve it and give back the enhancements to the community :)





And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

I would say where it is simple for you and for people to know it. 
May be in a about.



All answers or pointers to the correct people are welcome.

Greetings,

Peter

 

 

Peter Goessaert

Software Engineer

T <a href="tel:%2B32%202%20467%2034%2030" target="_blank">+32 2 467 34 30

't Hofveld 6E 3

1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium

[hidden email]
www.mediagenix.tv

<image001.png>

 

This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.

 

From: Peter Goessaert 
Sent: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 11:38
To: '[hidden email]'
Subject: EyeSee license

 

Hello,

 

The EyeSee project caught our interest, and we are investigating if we can use it in our product.

But first some license questions need an answer.

 

As far as I can see, it is MIT licensed so that would mean that we can load the EyeSee code into our product and deploy/sell that product commercially, but that we have to keep the copyright statement.

Is this correct?

And if we need to add the copyright for this specific package (EyeSee), what and where should it be presented in our software?

 

Greetings,

Peter

 

 




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

 


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



 

--

 

"Every thing has its own flow"





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

 

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

 


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FW: EyeSee license

davidm
In reply to this post by abergel
Hello Alexandre,

Could you point me to where exactly I can find the GraphET packages for VW?
So far I have been able to get it working in Pharo but I cant seem to find it for VW.
I was able to load Roassal from the Cincom Store, but that does not seem to include the GraphET packages, or am I overlooking something?

Thanks alot.

David
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: EyeSee license

abergel
Hi David,

Here is the archive.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31543901/online/ObjectProfileToolsVW.zip

Milton, in Cc:, is in charge to packaging our tools.

Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Jul 22, 2014, at 4:50 AM, davidm <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello Alexandre,
>
> Could you point me to where exactly I can find the GraphET packages for VW?
> So far I have been able to get it working in Pharo but I cant seem to find
> it for VW.
> I was able to load Roassal from the Cincom Store, but that does not seem to
> include the GraphET packages, or am I overlooking something?
>
> Thanks alot.
>
> David
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/FW-EyeSee-license-tp4766030p4769270.html
> Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev