Files missing from the repository?

Hi,

If I check out from the dev branch (ie. tla get
.../smalltalk--devo--2.2), I don't get any of the aclocal.m4 files, nor
various others.

I've merrily copied those that autoconf and automake complain about from
the smalltalk-2.2 tarball (hm. maybe the smalltalk-2.1h tarball would be
better?), but I don't know what else is required and what is necessary.

Regards,

Mike





_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Mike Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I check out from the dev branch (ie. tla get
> .../smalltalk--devo--2.2), I don't get any of the aclocal.m4 files, nor
> various others.
>  
You need the autotools to use the repository.
> I've merrily copied those that autoconf and automake complain about from
> the smalltalk-2.2 tarball (hm. maybe the smalltalk-2.1h tarball would be
> better?), but I don't know what else is required and what is necessary.
>  
The 2.2 versions are fine, the only changes should be the version numbers.

Paolo


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

*sigh*

I didn't realize there was an aclocal *as well* as an autoconf and
automake. Considering that these things are supposed to build Makefiles,
they take an awful lot of manual invocation.

Mike


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Mike Anderson wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> I didn't realize there was an aclocal *as well* as an autoconf and
> automake. Considering that these things are supposed to build Makefiles,
> they take an awful lot of manual invocation.
>
>  
autoreconf -fvi is your friend!

Paolo


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk