Filesystem and FS extensions in Pharo book

> Hey
>
> I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
>
> My suggestion:
>
> ---- Pharo Tools
> ---- ---- Filesystem
> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1
> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2
> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>
> Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated.
> What do you think?
>
> Max
>
>

> right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
>
> Stef
>
> On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
>
>> Hey
>>
>> I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
>>
>> My suggestion:
>>
>> ---- Pharo Tools
>> ---- ---- Filesystem
>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1
>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2
>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>
>> Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated.
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Max
>>
>>
>
>

> Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.
>
> Max
>
>
> On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
>>
>>> Hey
>>>
>>> I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
>>>
>>> My suggestion:
>>>
>>> ---- Pharo Tools
>>> ---- ---- Filesystem
>>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1
>>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2
>>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>>
>>> Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated.
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Max
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

> Max if you want to help what you can do is to have a look at the Filesystem chapter in the pharo by example vol 2 on github.
> We will update it and probably should do several passes on the chapter anyway.
> Stef
>
>
>
>> Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.
>>
>> Max
>>
>>
>> On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey
>>>>
>>>> I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
>>>>
>>>> My suggestion:
>>>>
>>>> ---- Pharo Tools
>>>> ---- ---- Filesystem
>>>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1
>>>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2
>>>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>>>
>>>> Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated.
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

> Ok, will do.
>
> Max
>
>
> On 22.03.2011, at 18:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> Max if you want to help what you can do is to have a look at the Filesystem chapter in the pharo by example vol 2 on github.
>> We will update it and probably should do several passes on the chapter anyway.
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.
>>>
>>> Max
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>>> right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey
>>>>>
>>>>> I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
>>>>>
>>>>> My suggestion:
>>>>>
>>>>> ---- Pharo Tools
>>>>> ---- ---- Filesystem
>>>>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1
>>>>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>>>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2
>>>>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated.
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Max
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>