Forms w/o action?

I'd just noticed XHTML validator complaining about <form> not specifying its
'action', is there an easy way to comply with the spec w/o breaking any of
the functionality?

Thanks!

-Boris

--
+1.604.689.0322
DeepCove Labs Ltd.
4th floor 595 Howe Street
Vancouver, Canada V6C 2T5

[hidden email]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This email is intended only for the persons named in the message
header. Unless otherwise indicated, it contains information that is
private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please
notify the sender and delete the entire message including any
attachments.

Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

Boris Popov wrote:
> I'd just noticed XHTML validator complaining about <form> not specifying its
> 'action', is there an easy way to comply with the spec w/o breaking any of
> the functionality?
>  
Boris --

I've also seen this (and I think I mentioned it here before a while
back) but am not completely sure
how to solve the problem.. I did manually modify my source code that I
was feeding into the validator
to add the string :  action=""

That made the validator happy, but I'm not sure if it will impact the
way Seaside behaves.  Anyone know the
answer?

BTW -- the current output from a typical generated form looks something
like :

<form method="post">
...
</form>

What the validator wants to see is something closer to this (for XHTML
1.0 Transitional anyway) :

<form method="post" action="">
...
</form>

-- Rick

_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside