Is it planed / possible to have SqueakSSL plugin in official VM shipped with Pharo ? Laurent ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> Date: Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:33 AM Subject: Re: [Cryptography Team] HttpsUrl MNU in Pharo 1.2 To: laurent laffont <[hidden email]> Cc: Cryptography Team Development List <[hidden email]> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, laurent laffont wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote: Levente
|
On Mar 6, 2011, at 8:39 AM, laurent laffont wrote: > Is it planed / possible to have SqueakSSL plugin in official VM shipped with Pharo ? What is the license? You know the last time we got trapped into the game "oh I did not decided yet" so never again. What is the status? Now we should clearly have a solution in the future. Stef > Laurent > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> > Date: Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:33 AM > Subject: Re: [Cryptography Team] HttpsUrl MNU in Pharo 1.2 > To: laurent laffont <[hidden email]> > Cc: Cryptography Team Development List <[hidden email]> > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, laurent laffont wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, laurent laffont wrote: > > Hi, > > I've tried to use https in Pharo. I've loaded SSL package from > Cryptography. > > (HttpsUrl absoluteFromText: 'https://www.google.com') raises MNU. > > I've fixet it by changing: > > SSLCipherSuite class>>supportedSuites > > "hexCodeStrings := #('000A' '0009' '0004' '0005' '0012' '0013' '0015' > '0016' > '0018' '001A' '001B')." > > | hexCodeStrings | > hexCodeStrings := #('000A' '0009' '0012' '0013' '0015' '0016' '0004' > '0005' > '0018' '001A' '001B'). > ^ (hexCodeStrings collect: [:e | self cipherSuiteAtHexString: e]) reject: > [:aSuite| aSuite isNil]. > > > (rejecting nil suites). > > I don't know the impact. > > > SSL it built on top of the Cryptography package. Since Pharo has some parts > of the Cryptography package already loaded, thing probably won't work as > they should. The last time I checked, this SSL implementation was > incomplete, so I'd suggest you to use SqueakSSL instead. > > > > I've tried SqueakSSL but it seems it needs a plugin which is not shipped > with Cog nor Pharo One-Click VM. Am I right ? > > That's right, but you can download prebuilt versions from here: http://code.google.com/p/squeakssl/downloads/list > > > Levente > > > > Laurent. > > > > > > > Levente > > > Cheers, > > Laurent Laffont - @lolgzs <http://twitter.com/#!/lolgzs> > > > Pharo Smalltalk Screencasts: http://www.pharocasts.com/ > Blog: http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Cryptography mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cryptography > > > |
On 06 Mar 2011, at 09:59, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > What is the status? > Now we should clearly have a solution in the future. I tried it before and I got it working on Pharo/Cog/MacOSX a little bit, but it wasn't a 'it just works' experience. I also looked at the plugin's C code and noticed that it wasn't complete on Mac OS X and not even on Linux. The interaction between the plugin and the Smalltalk code and especially the integration with SocketStream was not very encouraging. Sven |
thanks for the information.
Stef On Mar 6, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 06 Mar 2011, at 09:59, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> What is the status? >> Now we should clearly have a solution in the future. > > I tried it before and I got it working on Pharo/Cog/MacOSX a little bit, but it wasn't a 'it just works' experience. > I also looked at the plugin's C code and noticed that it wasn't complete on Mac OS X and not even on Linux. > The interaction between the plugin and the Smalltalk code and especially the integration with SocketStream was not very encouraging. > > Sven > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |