For the ones that were not there at that time.
Study history as always been a way to understand the present :) Begin forwarded message: > From: Matthew Fulmer <[hidden email]> > Date: February 28, 2009 6:26:00 AM CEST > To: Marcus Denker <[hidden email]>, St?phane Ducasse <[hidden email] > > > Cc: Matthew Fulmer <[hidden email]> > Subject: Some personal thoughts and questions about Pharo > > Hi. I stumbled across a rather interesting email while I was > researching to write up my campaign platform for the squeak > election. Stef wrote this email 4 years ago, and it challenged a > lot of what I thought about Pharo: > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2005-January/087532.html > > It prompted me to write this email, and lay out exactly what I > think about Pharo, both good, bad, and not understood. > >> From what I can tell, this email was written just before you > guys started the 3.9 team. > > Firstly, I see that you have really cared about bug response > latency for a long time. I'm really glad you care and do > something about it. > > Second, you solved this problem back then by releasing 3.9, > and now you are solving it thru Pharo. Why did you choose to > fork this time? > > If I may be blunt, I've long suspected that there are exactly > two reasons why you forked: > 1. Edgar J. De. Cleene > 2. Andreas Raab > > Thirdly, I've heard Stef mention a number of times that "Marcus > got burned", and therefore doesn't read squeak-dev, or no longer > runs for board, or several things most squeak people do. > However, this is by far the earliest mention of said burning > I've ever seen. I had assumed the burning was people (Edgar and > Andreas) complaining about Traits, but this was long before > that. > > What is it that happened to Marcus? If you are still bitter > about something that happened over 4 years ago, perhaps it is > time to forgive and re-join the squeak community. > > > As 3.11 release team leader, and Squeak board nominee, I'm > really excited about what you guys are doing with Pharo. From my > perspective, one thing you have done is take up the reigns for > harvesting bugs, and left the release team free to consider a > long-standing issue in the community: who is responsible for > merging bug fixes from one distribution to another, and how can > we make their lives easier > > > Another valuable thing you have done is show the community that > one image does not fit all; the monolithic image does not work > for anybody. Squeakland showed it does not work for end-users > Croquet showed it does not work for researchers. And now Pharo > shows that it does not work for developers. I really think that > Pharo finishes painting that picture in the minds of the > community, and you have thus paved the way for the release team > and the squeak board to get away from the monolithic image, and > toward modularity. I really think the community is ready now, > and it's all thanks to you guys. I intend to exploit this > opportunity. > > I sent this email in private, because I don't think it would be > appropriate to ask some of these questions publicly. However, > feel free to reply to any of this in public, as you see fit. > > -- > Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |