Smalltalk › Gnu

Fwd: VisualGST Issues

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

8 messages Options

Paolo Bonzini-2

Fwd: VisualGST Issues

> Hi list,
>
> Yesterday, I builded GST 3.2 from git, in my Fedora 11 64 bits box, >
> and my MacOS box.
>
> I can open gst-browser, but some things don't works.
>
> - "Add NameSpace". "Add Class", "Add Category" do anything. (but this
> worked in the past AFAIR)
> - "Rename Method" throws: GtkMethodWidget error: DNU #renameMethod
> - "Tools Menu->Browser Window" gives DNU if there aren't a selected
> text.
> - "Browse implementors" and "Browse senders", throws nil error: DNU
> #model
> - "Tools Menu->SUnit" don't show any testcase.

Maybe there are none? :-)

Try (PackageLoader packageAt: 'Complex') test fileIn.

> - "Help menu->About launcher" shows 0.6.0 version. I suppose it
> should be 0.7.0, and close button don't works.
> - "Help menu->About GNU Smalltalk" close button don't works.
>
> This are the things I saw in the minutes I tried it.
>
> I hope this can be helpfull.

Yes.

Gwen, can we get these fixed before say the middle of June? They're all
pretty serious.

> P.S.: Sorry for the copy Paolo, but I don't know why, some emails I
> sent don't reaches the list. I lost about 3 mails in last days.

Disabling HTML email is usually a good start...

Paolo

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Holger Freyther

Re: Fwd: VisualGST Issues

On 05/26/2010 06:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Yesterday, I builded GST 3.2 from git, in my Fedora 11 64 bits box, >
>> and my MacOS box.

>> - "Rename Method" throws: GtkMethodWidget error: DNU #renameMethod
>> - "Tools Menu->Browser Window" gives DNU if there aren't a selected
>> text.

I think I have fixed this one and it is merged into Gwen's tree.

>> - "Browse implementors" and "Browse senders", throws nil error: DNU
>> #model
>> - "Tools Menu->SUnit" don't show any testcase.
>
> Maybe there are none? :-)
>
> Try (PackageLoader packageAt: 'Complex') test fileIn.

I have added a menu option to load test cases for the loaded
packages/features.. and it worked for the packages I tested it with but
this one was failing for Seaside-Core and I plan to look at it too.

>
>> - "Help menu->About launcher" shows 0.6.0 version. I suppose it
>> should be 0.7.0, and close button don't works.
>> - "Help menu->About GNU Smalltalk" close button don't works.

I have fixed all menu's and close buttons and it is in Gwen's tree already.

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Paolo Bonzini-2

Re: Fwd: VisualGST Issues

>>> - "Rename Method" throws: GtkMethodWidget error: DNU #renameMethod
>>> - "Tools Menu->Browser Window" gives DNU if there aren't a selected
>>> text.
>
> I think I have fixed this one and it is merged into Gwen's tree.

I see all these fixes are in Gwen's master branch, not in stable.

I shouldn't be the one who tests VisualGST before a release. I just
trust that what is called stable _is_ actually stable. If it is not
that way, I have no problem upgrading to master for 3.2.1 if it is
better. But please let's be consistent with the nomenclature.

From now on, I suggest that VisualGST should follow these rules:

- let's drop the stable branch for now and fix the above issues on the
master branch.

- as soon as master is ready to be imported into GNU Smalltalk, Gwen
should do "git checkout stable; git merge -s ours master" and push it.
_Only then_ I'll import it. This will be a blocker for 3.2.1.

- new features will _exclusively_ be developed on the master branch.

- bugfixes will _exclusively_ be developed on the stable branch, and
merged from there into the master branch. It's up to Gwen whether he
wants to do the stable->master branch himself, or he prefers to get two
pull requests.

Otherwise, I'll have to remove VisualGST and leave it as a hosted
project on smalltalk.gnu.org only (i.e. "at your risk"). I obviously
don't want to do that.

Paolo

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Nicolas Petton

Re: Fwd: VisualGST Issues

Le mercredi 26 mai 2010 à 14:34 +0200, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
>
> Otherwise, I'll have to remove VisualGST and leave it as a hosted
> project on smalltalk.gnu.org only (i.e. "at your risk"). I obviously
> don't want to do that.

This sounds a bit ear-splitting to me :-/

Nico

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

signature.asc (205 bytes) Download Attachment

Giuseppe

Re: Fwd: VisualGST Issues

In reply to this post by Paolo Bonzini-2

Are this merged to test?

El 26/05/2010, a las 14:34, Paolo Bonzini escribió:

>>>> - "Rename Method" throws: GtkMethodWidget error: DNU #renameMethod
>>>> - "Tools Menu->Browser Window" gives DNU if there aren't a selected
>>>> text.
>>
>> I think I have fixed this one and it is merged into Gwen's tree.
>
> I see all these fixes are in Gwen's master branch, not in stable.
>
> I shouldn't be the one who tests VisualGST before a release. I just
> trust that what is called stable _is_ actually stable. If it is not
> that way, I have no problem upgrading to master for 3.2.1 if it is
> better. But please let's be consistent with the nomenclature.
>
> From now on, I suggest that VisualGST should follow these rules:
>
> - let's drop the stable branch for now and fix the above issues on
> the master branch.
>
> - as soon as master is ready to be imported into GNU Smalltalk, Gwen
> should do "git checkout stable; git merge -s ours master" and push
> it. _Only then_ I'll import it. This will be a blocker for 3.2.1.
>
> - new features will _exclusively_ be developed on the master branch.
>
> - bugfixes will _exclusively_ be developed on the stable branch, and
> merged from there into the master branch. It's up to Gwen whether
> he wants to do the stable->master branch himself, or he prefers to
> get two pull requests.
>
> Otherwise, I'll have to remove VisualGST and leave it as a hosted
> project on smalltalk.gnu.org only (i.e. "at your risk"). I
> obviously don't want to do that.
>
> Paolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> help-smalltalk mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz
Blog: http://www.lordzealon.com
Twitter & Skype & GoogleTalk accounts: glpunzi

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Paolo Bonzini-2

Re: Fwd: VisualGST Issues

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 21:56, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> Are this merged to test?

Not yet, I didn't get answers to the (implicit) questions I asked.

>> I have no problem upgrading to master for 3.2.1 if it is better.

Is it better?

>> - let's drop the stable branch for now and fix the above issues on the
>> master branch.
>>
>> - as soon as master is ready to be imported into GNU Smalltalk, Gwen
>> should do "git checkout stable; git merge -s ours master" and push it. _Only
>> then_ I'll import it. This will be a blocker for 3.2.1.
>>
>> - new features will _exclusively_ be developed on the master branch.
>>
>> - bugfixes will _exclusively_ be developed on the stable branch, and
>> merged from there into the master branch. It's up to Gwen whether he wants
>> to do the stable->master branch himself, or he prefers to get two pull
>> requests.

Is this okay?

Paolo

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Giuseppe

Re: Fwd: VisualGST Issues

Hi Gwenael,

Some news about this?

Cheers.

El vie, 28-05-2010 a las 09:15 +0200, Gwenaël Casaccio escribió:

> I will send a mail about the VisualGST state in the mailing list
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Paolo Bonzini <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 21:56, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Are this merged to test?
>
>
> Not yet, I didn't get answers to the (implicit) questions I
> asked.
>
> >> I have no problem upgrading to master for 3.2.1 if it is
> better.
>
>
> Is it better?
>
> >> - let's drop the stable branch for now and fix the above
> issues on the
> >> master branch.
> >>
> >> - as soon as master is ready to be imported into GNU
> Smalltalk, Gwen
> >> should do "git checkout stable; git merge -s ours master"
> and push it. _Only
> >> then_ I'll import it. This will be a blocker for 3.2.1.
> >>
> >> - new features will _exclusively_ be developed on the
> master branch.
> >>
> >> - bugfixes will _exclusively_ be developed on the stable
> branch, and
> >> merged from there into the master branch. It's up to Gwen
> whether he wants
> >> to do the stable->master branch himself, or he prefers to
> get two pull
> >> requests.
>
>
> Is this okay?
>
>
> Paolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> help-smalltalk mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
>
>

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Paolo Bonzini-2

Re: Fwd: VisualGST Issues

On 06/11/2010 03:18 PM, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi wrote:
> Hi Gwenael,
>
> Some news about this?

I and Gwenael will work on this, possibly in the weekend.

Paolo

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk