Folks,
If we can devise a "benchmark" kind of package I have an old P-III with OEM Win2K that I can put for comparing against my (newer, but not leading edge) machines.
Em 26/11/2009 19:45, Stéphane Ducasse <
[hidden email] > escreveu:
Begin forwarded message:
> From: neil butterworth
> Date: November 26, 2009 10:29:57 PM GMT+01:00
> To: Stéphane Ducasse
> Subject: Re: about Pharo
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote:
>> Hi Neil
>
> Hello
>
>>
>> what you report is strange.
>> Can you let us know:
>
>> - vm
>
> The Pharo VM is the current (as of a couple of days ago) download from
> the Pharo Homepage - Squeak 3.11.4 (beta).
>
>> - OS
>
> Win2K SP4
>
>> - image version
>
> Once again, a very recent download - pharo1.0-10493-rc1dev09.11.2.image
>
>> - your display depth
>
> True Color 24 bit
>
>> Because people are using pharo on production and we got an increase of 15% of Morphic
>> in pharo 1.1 so I have some doubts.
>
> It is very definitely much slower than Squeak on my system. This is an
> old laptop 900MHz P3, but it has no problems at all running Squeak.
>
> Neil Butterworth
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Locked
