Probably not, it was not the right interpretation...
2013/1/22 Sven Van Caekenberghe <
[hidden email]>:
> Probably worth picking up:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Bert Freudenberg <
[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Monticello-nice.528.mcz
>> Date: 22 Jan 2013 20:12:14 GMT+01:00
>> To:
[hidden email]
>> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <
[hidden email]>
>>
>>
>> On 22.01.2013, at 14:42,
[hidden email] wrote:
>>
>>> A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox:
>>>
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-nice.528.mcz>>>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>
>>> Name: Monticello-nice.528
>>> Author: nice
>>> Time: 22 January 2013, 3:42:35.787 pm
>>> UUID: 3bc3c4a2-2ec6-e942-9517-5da75b32bac5
>>> Ancestors: Monticello-bf.527
>>>
>>> Let MCTool inherit from Model.
>>> This is to avoid nasty garbage to survive in DependentsFields with kilo bytes of un-released MCDefinition cache.
>>
>> Looks reasonable. Commit it and we'll find out soon if there are problems.
>>
>> - Bert -
>
>