Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Moose

GLMRoassal2Presentation is Roassal2?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

4 messages Options

Uko2

GLMRoassal2Presentation is Roassal2?

Hi,

why can’t we put GLMRoassal2Presentation and related classes into roassal? For now when you load roassal into your image you cannot see roassal view in the inspector, you cannot see examples and so on. Glamour is by default now in Pharo image. Why should roassal related code be in special glamour repo and not in roassal repo?

Uko
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Tudor Girba-2

Re: GLMRoassal2Presentation is Roassal2?

Hi,

Up to Pharo 4, Glamour was not in the image. Things have changed now, and perhaps we should do just that.

Cheers,

Doru

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

why can’t we put GLMRoassal2Presentation and related classes into roassal? For now when you load roassal into your image you cannot see roassal view in the inspector, you cannot see examples and so on. Glamour is by default now in Pharo image. Why should roassal related code be in special glamour repo and not in roassal repo?

Uko
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Uko2

Re: GLMRoassal2Presentation is Roassal2?

I’ll be looking forward :)

On 28 Apr 2015, at 20:17, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Up to Pharo 4, Glamour was not in the image. Things have changed now, and perhaps we should do just that.

Cheers,
Doru

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

why can’t we put GLMRoassal2Presentation and related classes into roassal? For now when you load roassal into your image you cannot see roassal view in the inspector, you cannot see examples and so on. Glamour is by default now in Pharo image. Why should roassal related code be in special glamour repo and not in roassal repo?

Uko
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

abergel

Re: GLMRoassal2Presentation is Roassal2?

In reply to this post by Uko2

Indeed!
I will fix this

Alexandre

> On Apr 28, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> why can’t we put GLMRoassal2Presentation and related classes into roassal? For now when you load roassal into your image you cannot see roassal view in the inspector, you cannot see examples and so on. Glamour is by default now in Pharo image. Why should roassal related code be in special glamour repo and not in roassal repo?
>
> Uko
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev