I am using GS64 3.1.0.2 and GBS 7.5
I have recompiled the source for all my classes. For about 4 classes, I get this kind of thing sometimes ... Class <PPsmVw class> includes in its <instVarMap>, the name instVarsInfo which is not a server instance variable name Note that this always class-side, and the instVarsInfo name is from the GS3 hierarchy and is not in the GS2 hierarchy, so there is some reasonableness here. Howevfer, I have a number of times done a class file-out and file-in on these (gs fileOut/In), and I still get this. One other interesting thing is that all but ONE of these classes have no instance-side methods, and the one that does seemed fine until just recently (the others have been doing this for a few weeks now as I worked at the GS3 port). -- Dennis Smith +1 416.798.7948 Cherniak Software Development Corporation Fax: +1 416.798.0948 509-2001 Sheppard Avenue East [hidden email] Toronto, ON M2J 4Z8 sip:[hidden email] Canada http://www.CherniakSoftware.com Entrance off Yorkland Blvd south of Sheppard Ave east of the DVP -- GemStone-Smalltalk mailing list Unsubscribe: send e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in body (without quotes) to: [hidden email] Archive: http://forum.world.st/Gemstone-Customers-f1461796.html |
What does the client class PPsmVw look like? You'd get this error if
the client class has the instance variable, but not the server class. On 1/15/2013 12:48 PM, Dennis Smith wrote: > I am using GS64 3.1.0.2 and GBS 7.5 > > I have recompiled the source for all my classes. > > For about 4 classes, I get this kind of thing sometimes ... > > > Class <PPsmVw class> includes in its <instVarMap>, > the name instVarsInfo which is not a server instance variable name > > Note that this always class-side, and the instVarsInfo name is from the > GS3 hierarchy and is not in the GS2 > hierarchy, so there is some reasonableness here. > > Howevfer, I have a number of times done a class file-out and file-in on > these (gs fileOut/In), and I still get this. > One other interesting thing is that all but ONE of these classes have no > instance-side methods, and the one that does seemed fine until just > recently (the others have been doing this for a few weeks now as I > worked at the GS3 port). > > -- GemStone-Smalltalk mailing list Unsubscribe: send e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in body (without quotes) to: [hidden email] Archive: http://forum.world.st/Gemstone-Customers-f1461796.html |
Ths instance variables (which are on the class side!!) are part of the
Class hierarchy, and are in fact (there were a number of ivars noted) in "Behavior". So what it would SEEM like is that the class is somehow still not in the proper GS3 hierarchy?? On 2013-01-15 4:28 PM, Lisa Almarode wrote: > What does the client class PPsmVw look like? You'd get this error if > the client class has the instance variable, but not the server class. > > On 1/15/2013 12:48 PM, Dennis Smith wrote: >> I am using GS64 3.1.0.2 and GBS 7.5 >> >> I have recompiled the source for all my classes. >> >> For about 4 classes, I get this kind of thing sometimes ... >> >> >> Class <PPsmVw class> includes in its <instVarMap>, >> the name instVarsInfo which is not a server instance variable name >> >> Note that this always class-side, and the instVarsInfo name is from the >> GS3 hierarchy and is not in the GS2 >> hierarchy, so there is some reasonableness here. >> >> Howevfer, I have a number of times done a class file-out and file-in on >> these (gs fileOut/In), and I still get this. >> One other interesting thing is that all but ONE of these classes have no >> instance-side methods, and the one that does seemed fine until just >> recently (the others have been doing this for a few weeks now as I >> worked at the GS3 port). >> >> -- Dennis Smith +1 416.798.7948 Cherniak Software Development Corporation Fax: +1 416.798.0948 509-2001 Sheppard Avenue East [hidden email] Toronto, ON M2J 4Z8 sip:[hidden email] Canada http://www.CherniakSoftware.com Entrance off Yorkland Blvd south of Sheppard Ave east of the DVP -- GemStone-Smalltalk mailing list Unsubscribe: send e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in body (without quotes) to: [hidden email] Archive: http://forum.world.st/Gemstone-Customers-f1461796.html |
In reply to this post by Dennis smith-4
Further to this (working the class side), if I look at say
System class _instVarNames or Collection class _instVarNames I get #(#superClass #format #instVars #instVarNames #constraints #classVars #methodDict #poolDictionaries #categories #secondarySuperclasses #name #classHistory #description #migrationDestination #timeStamp #userId #extraDict #classCategory #subclasses) Which appears to be incorrect, since the class hierarchy is (or should be) Class -> Metaclass3 -> Module -> Behavior and "Behavior" has ivars ... #(superClass format instVarsInfo instVarNames constraints classVars methDicts poolDictionaries categorys primaryCopy) What I see as _instVarNames looks a bit like the GS2.x list of names. This was a 2.x database updated via "upgradeImage -s stoneName", and given that I get the GS3 classes (like Metaclass3) it would seem the upgrade was correct. Where this creates a problem is in GbxOffsetCache >> generateNamedOffsets which gets the list of GS ivars using "_instVarNames". On 2013-01-15 3:48 PM, Dennis Smith wrote: > I am using GS64 3.1.0.2 and GBS 7.5 > > I have recompiled the source for all my classes. > > For about 4 classes, I get this kind of thing sometimes ... > > > Class <PPsmVw class> includes in its <instVarMap>, > the name instVarsInfo which is not a server instance variable > name > > Note that this always class-side, and the instVarsInfo name is from > the GS3 hierarchy and is not in the GS2 > hierarchy, so there is some reasonableness here. > > Howevfer, I have a number of times done a class file-out and file-in > on these (gs fileOut/In), and I still get this. > One other interesting thing is that all but ONE of these classes have > no instance-side methods, and the one that does seemed fine until just > recently (the others have been doing this for a few weeks now as I > worked at the GS3 port). > > -- Dennis Smith +1 416.798.7948 Cherniak Software Development Corporation Fax: +1 416.798.0948 509-2001 Sheppard Avenue East [hidden email] Toronto, ON M2J 4Z8 sip:[hidden email] Canada http://www.CherniakSoftware.com Entrance off Yorkland Blvd south of Sheppard Ave east of the DVP -- GemStone-Smalltalk mailing list Unsubscribe: send e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in body (without quotes) to: [hidden email] Archive: http://forum.world.st/Gemstone-Customers-f1461796.html |
On 01/16/2013 06:35 AM, Dennis Smith wrote:
> Further to this (working the class side), if I look at say > System class _instVarNames > or > Collection class _instVarNames > I get > #(#superClass #format #instVars #instVarNames #constraints #classVars > #methodDict #poolDictionaries #categories #secondarySuperclasses #name > #classHistory #description #migrationDestination #timeStamp #userId > #extraDict #classCategory #subclasses) > > Which appears to be incorrect, since the class hierarchy is (or should > be) Class -> Metaclass3 -> Module -> Behavior and "Behavior" has ivars > ... > #(superClass format instVarsInfo instVarNames constraints classVars > methDicts poolDictionaries categorys primaryCopy) > > > What I see as _instVarNames looks a bit like the GS2.x list of names. > > This was a 2.x database updated via "upgradeImage -s stoneName", and > given that I get the GS3 classes (like Metaclass3) it would seem the > upgrade was correct. > > Where this creates a problem is in > GbxOffsetCache >> generateNamedOffsets > which gets the list of GS ivars using "_instVarNames". Hi Dennis, Thanks for the report, there is indeed a problem. Upgraded repositories can legitimately have old-style metaclasses in them, and there are cases in which GBS doesn't handle this correctly. I'm working on a "proper" fix, but you may be able to get past this for now by just turning off "confirm" in the GBS configuration. Please let us know whether this works for you. Regards, -Martin -- GemStone-Smalltalk mailing list Unsubscribe: send e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in body (without quotes) to: [hidden email] Archive: http://forum.world.st/Gemstone-Customers-f1461796.html |
Thanks martin -- did that (turned off confirm) this morning :)
Nothing like hiding a problem :) but works for me! On 2013-01-16 5:57 PM, Martin McClure wrote: > On 01/16/2013 06:35 AM, Dennis Smith wrote: >> Further to this (working the class side), if I look at say >> System class _instVarNames >> or >> Collection class _instVarNames >> I get >> #(#superClass #format #instVars #instVarNames #constraints #classVars >> #methodDict #poolDictionaries #categories #secondarySuperclasses #name >> #classHistory #description #migrationDestination #timeStamp #userId >> #extraDict #classCategory #subclasses) >> >> Which appears to be incorrect, since the class hierarchy is (or should >> be) Class -> Metaclass3 -> Module -> Behavior and "Behavior" has ivars >> ... >> #(superClass format instVarsInfo instVarNames constraints classVars >> methDicts poolDictionaries categorys primaryCopy) >> >> >> What I see as _instVarNames looks a bit like the GS2.x list of names. >> >> This was a 2.x database updated via "upgradeImage -s stoneName", and >> given that I get the GS3 classes (like Metaclass3) it would seem the >> upgrade was correct. >> >> Where this creates a problem is in >> GbxOffsetCache >> generateNamedOffsets >> which gets the list of GS ivars using "_instVarNames". > Hi Dennis, > > Thanks for the report, there is indeed a problem. Upgraded repositories > can legitimately have old-style metaclasses in them, and there are cases > in which GBS doesn't handle this correctly. > > I'm working on a "proper" fix, but you may be able to get past this for > now by just turning off "confirm" in the GBS configuration. Please let > us know whether this works for you. > > Regards, > > -Martin -- Dennis Smith +1 416.798.7948 Cherniak Software Development Corporation Fax: +1 416.798.0948 509-2001 Sheppard Avenue East [hidden email] Toronto, ON M2J 4Z8 sip:[hidden email] Canada http://www.CherniakSoftware.com Entrance off Yorkland Blvd south of Sheppard Ave east of the DVP -- GemStone-Smalltalk mailing list Unsubscribe: send e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in body (without quotes) to: [hidden email] Archive: http://forum.world.st/Gemstone-Customers-f1461796.html |
On 01/16/2013 02:59 PM, Dennis Smith wrote:
> Thanks martin -- did that (turned off confirm) this morning :) > > Nothing like hiding a problem :) but works for me! Glad to hear it. As far as I can tell, there are no ill effects from doing this, it's just a nuisance warning from an over-strict consistency check. Regards, -Martin -- GemStone-Smalltalk mailing list Unsubscribe: send e-mail with the word "unsubscribe" in body (without quotes) to: [hidden email] Archive: http://forum.world.st/Gemstone-Customers-f1461796.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |