[GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

George Herolyants-3
Hi, guys!

Here is a project idea for GSoC. Something that, I think, one day came
into everyone's mind. I've just written it:

---------------------------

++ Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Source code management is highly important aspect of every software
project. Currently in Squeak/Pharo world developer has very limited
choice of such tools. The only available full-featured SCM tool is
Monticello. Other alternatives such as changesets lack in some areas.
Monticello in its own turn has some disadvantages: it can only handle
Smalltalk code while typical software project has many other artefacts
(represented primarily as files) such as documentation, scripts,
diagrams and so on, which would be nice to have in the same
repository. This project aims to get round these disadvantages by
creating a possibility for developers to use modern distributed source
code management tools, which are popular outside of the Smalltalk
community. The most recognized are git and mercurial.

**Technical details**

This project may go different ways towards it's goal, depending on
decisions being made during it.

Initial steps will be:
* Examining git/mercurial and choose one of them considering
simplicity of API and it's ease of use, supported operating systems on
and other important factors.
* Defining and implementing a file mapping format for the Smalltalk
code structure (classes, methods and so on), in order to support
versioning at the level of separate methods (there is already one
defined by SqueakSVN project so this step may require examining it).
Or examining the ability to avoid such a mapping and store code
directly without needing a working copy on disk.
* Studying how Squeak/Pharo handles system changes (changes of
classes, methods). Then implement handlers for such changes to
translate them to working copy using the mapping or through SCM API.
* (optional but desirable) Implementing Smalltalk interface to the
chosen SCM. It can be based on the SCM's command line interface or on
it's API. These will require using OSProcess or FFI (or writing a
plugin) respectively.

Additional steps may include:
* Implementing import/export tool for Monticello repositories.
* Implementing simple user interface for the chosen SCM so that
programmer can work with it from within the Smalltalk environment.
Integration with widely used OmniBrowser would be even better.

In addition to this a local git/mercurial repository can be used
instead of sources/changes files. This will require:

* Exploring the current mechanism used in Pharo/Squeak to maintain
method version history.
* Replacing it with the developed system which will write changes to
the local git/mercurial repository.

**Benefits to the student**

The student will:
* learn about modern source code management systems;
* study their interfaces, both command line and API;
* study Pharo/Squeak internal mechanisms related to handling of
classes and methods changes and storing of method versions.
* get experience in usage of FFI or writing plugins for Smalltalk VM;
* get experience with making GUI in Pharo/Squeak;
* enjoy writing programs in Smalltalk :)

**Benefits to the community**

Developers will be able to choose SCM system grounding this choice on
their own preferences. The community will gain access to some famous
source code hosting services such as GitHub or Bitbucket. Among other
benefits it will increase visibility of the community and the
Smalltalk language in whole. It also will lower the entry barriers to
newcomers and as a consequence will help community grow.

Getting rid of sources/changes files offers potentially unlimited
method version history and avoids so called "condensing changes". And
using local git/mercurial repository for this purpose will make
managing changes more natural and uniform in small (every method
accepting) and in large (changes at the project level).

----------------------------

I would like to be a mentor (if no one agrees to mentor) or co-mentor,
if you guys don't mind.
Hope it's not too late :)


George

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Mariano Martinez Peck
Hi George. Thanks for the proposal. Yes, you have time until tomorrow morning :)

Would be cool to see what other think. Now...do this make sense if we already have SqueakSVN ?  which this new project would be better than SqueakSVN or why isn't it worth to continue with SqueakSVN instead of start from scratch ?

Is it just because GIT seems to be better than SVN ? 

Maybe a clarification of this in your proposal will be better so that people like me understand why this project is interesting.

Cheers

Mariano

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:27 PM, George Herolyants <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi, guys!

Here is a project idea for GSoC. Something that, I think, one day came
into everyone's mind. I've just written it:

---------------------------

++ Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Source code management is highly important aspect of every software
project. Currently in Squeak/Pharo world developer has very limited
choice of such tools. The only available full-featured SCM tool is
Monticello. Other alternatives such as changesets lack in some areas.
Monticello in its own turn has some disadvantages: it can only handle
Smalltalk code while typical software project has many other artefacts
(represented primarily as files) such as documentation, scripts,
diagrams and so on, which would be nice to have in the same
repository. This project aims to get round these disadvantages by
creating a possibility for developers to use modern distributed source
code management tools, which are popular outside of the Smalltalk
community. The most recognized are git and mercurial.

**Technical details**

This project may go different ways towards it's goal, depending on
decisions being made during it.

Initial steps will be:
* Examining git/mercurial and choose one of them considering
simplicity of API and it's ease of use, supported operating systems on
and other important factors.
* Defining and implementing a file mapping format for the Smalltalk
code structure (classes, methods and so on), in order to support
versioning at the level of separate methods (there is already one
defined by SqueakSVN project so this step may require examining it).
Or examining the ability to avoid such a mapping and store code
directly without needing a working copy on disk.
* Studying how Squeak/Pharo handles system changes (changes of
classes, methods). Then implement handlers for such changes to
translate them to working copy using the mapping or through SCM API.
* (optional but desirable) Implementing Smalltalk interface to the
chosen SCM. It can be based on the SCM's command line interface or on
it's API. These will require using OSProcess or FFI (or writing a
plugin) respectively.

Additional steps may include:
* Implementing import/export tool for Monticello repositories.
* Implementing simple user interface for the chosen SCM so that
programmer can work with it from within the Smalltalk environment.
Integration with widely used OmniBrowser would be even better.

In addition to this a local git/mercurial repository can be used
instead of sources/changes files. This will require:

* Exploring the current mechanism used in Pharo/Squeak to maintain
method version history.
* Replacing it with the developed system which will write changes to
the local git/mercurial repository.

**Benefits to the student**

The student will:
* learn about modern source code management systems;
* study their interfaces, both command line and API;
* study Pharo/Squeak internal mechanisms related to handling of
classes and methods changes and storing of method versions.
* get experience in usage of FFI or writing plugins for Smalltalk VM;
* get experience with making GUI in Pharo/Squeak;
* enjoy writing programs in Smalltalk :)

**Benefits to the community**

Developers will be able to choose SCM system grounding this choice on
their own preferences. The community will gain access to some famous
source code hosting services such as GitHub or Bitbucket. Among other
benefits it will increase visibility of the community and the
Smalltalk language in whole. It also will lower the entry barriers to
newcomers and as a consequence will help community grow.

Getting rid of sources/changes files offers potentially unlimited
method version history and avoids so called "condensing changes". And
using local git/mercurial repository for this purpose will make
managing changes more natural and uniform in small (every method
accepting) and in large (changes at the project level).

----------------------------

I would like to be a mentor (if no one agrees to mentor) or co-mentor,
if you guys don't mind.
Hope it's not too late :)


George


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

George Herolyants-3
Hi, Mariano.

2010/3/11 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>:
> Would be cool to see what other think. Now...do this make sense if we
> already have SqueakSVN ?  which this new project would be better than
> SqueakSVN or why isn't it worth to continue with SqueakSVN instead of start
> from scratch ?

There's some points. First, Git and Mercurial become more and more
popular, especially in the open source world.
Second, they are distributed which is important aspect, especially
again for the open source.
I tried SqueakSVN and it also requires some work. Less than this
project, of course. But I think some parts of the SqueakSVN can be
reused. SVN is client-server SCM so it can't compete with Monticello
which is highly distributed.
Competition is good, and more choice is better. I even think that
developing them in parallel can help each of them and Monticello too.

And I'm generally interested in distributed solutions, while svn isn't
one of them.

Also, Git/Mercurial suit better to replace changes/sources again
because of their distributed nature.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Randal L. Schwartz
In reply to this post by George Herolyants-3
>>>>> "George" == George Herolyants <[hidden email]> writes:


George> Initial steps will be:
George> * Examining git/mercurial and choose one of them considering
George> simplicity of API and it's ease of use, supported operating systems on
George> and other important factors.

I believe someone has already written Smalltalk code to parse
the git object tree.  I forget where I heard it, but I definitely
went "cool!" in response.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[hidden email]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

George Herolyants-3
2010/3/11 Randal L. Schwartz <[hidden email]>:
> I believe someone has already written Smalltalk code to parse
> the git object tree.  I forget where I heard it, but I definitely
> went "cool!" in response.

Yeah! I've just found it here
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general/142806.
So as I already mentioned the idea isn't new :) And some people did
real progress on the issue, while it was only in my "to look at" list
with possible transition to the "todo" list. :)

Maybe I should ask the author of it?

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Mariano Martinez Peck


On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:42 PM, George Herolyants <[hidden email]> wrote:
2010/3/11 Randal L. Schwartz <[hidden email]>:
> I believe someone has already written Smalltalk code to parse
> the git object tree.  I forget where I heard it, but I definitely
> went "cool!" in response.

Yeah! I've just found it here
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general/142806.
So as I already mentioned the idea isn't new :) And some people did
real progress on the issue, while it was only in my "to look at" list
with possible transition to the "todo" list. :)

Maybe I should ask the author of it?


Yes!!! moreover he can be co-mentor or something like that...Of course, if the project still have sense (I have no idea what is done in that project)

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

George Herolyants-3
Argh... This "reply to" vs. "reply to all".


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: George Herolyants <[hidden email]>
Date: 2010/3/12
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration
with git/mercurial.
To: Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>


2010/3/11 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>:
> Yes!!! moreover he can be co-mentor or something like that...Of course, if
> the project still have sense (I have no idea what is done in that project)

So I emailed him (Tony Garnock-Jones) yesterday. Still have no reply.
I should have cc'ed the email to this list, but it was at the end of
the day and my brain just stopped working :)

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

George Herolyants-3
Here's slightly updated proposal (I included some info about SqueakSVN
project and about Smalltalk implementation of Git storage format):

-----------------------------

++ Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Source code management is highly important aspect of every software
project. Currently in Squeak/Pharo world developer has very limited
choice of such tools. The only available full-featured SCM tool is
Monticello. Other alternatives such as changesets lack in some areas.
Monticello in its own turn has some disadvantages: it can only handle
Smalltalk code while typical software project has many other artefacts
(represented primarily as files) such as documentation, scripts,
diagrams and so on, which would be nice to have in the same
repository. This project aims to get round this and some other
disadvantages by creating a possibility for developers to use modern
distributed source code management tools, which are popular outside of
the Smalltalk community. The most recognized are git and mercurial.

There is already SqueakSVN project but it aims to SVN integration. SVN
is classic client-server SCM. But nowadays this kind of SCM's become
less popular, while popularity of distributed SCM's (such as
git/mercurial) is still growing. It is also crucial for open source
projects like Pharo/Squeak to have distributed SCM to ease development
process. Monticello is highly distributed and the new SCM must be
distributed as well to successfully compete with Monticello. So
git/mercurial fits this goal very well.

**Technical details**

This project may go different ways towards it's goal, depending on
decisions being made during it.

Initial steps will be:
* Examining git/mercurial and choose one of them considering
simplicity of API and it's ease of use, supported operating systems on
and other important factors. There's also pure Smalltalk
implementation of Git storage format, so this step will require
examining it as well.
* Defining and implementing a file mapping format for the Smalltalk
code structure (classes, methods and so on), in order to support
versioning at the level of separate methods (there is already one
defined by SqueakSVN project so this step may require examining it).
Or examining the ability to avoid such a mapping and store code
directly without needing a working copy on disk. (There's also pure
smalltalk implementation of Git storage format on SqueakSource.
* Studying how Squeak/Pharo handles system changes (changes of
classes, methods). Then implement handlers for such changes to
translate them to working copy using the mapping or through SCM API.
* (optional but desirable) Implementing Smalltalk interface to the
chosen SCM. It can be based on the SCM's command line interface or on
it's API. These will require using OSProcess or FFI (or writing a
plugin) respectively.

Additional steps may include:
* Implementing import/export tool for Monticello repositories.
* Implementing simple user interface for the chosen SCM so that
programmer can work with it from within the Smalltalk environment.
Integration with widely used OmniBrowser would be even better.

In addition to this a local git/mercurial repository can be used
instead of sources/changes files. This will require:

* Exploring the current mechanism used in Pharo/Squeak to maintain
method version history.
* Replacing it with the developed system which will write changes to
the local git/mercurial repository.

**Benefits to the student**

The student will:
* learn about modern source code management systems;
* study their interfaces, both command line and API;
* study Pharo/Squeak internal mechanisms related to handling of
classes and methods changes and storing of method versions.
* get experience in usage of FFI or writing plugins for Smalltalk VM;
* get experience with making GUI in Pharo/Squeak;
* enjoy writing programs in Smalltalk :)

**Benefits to the community**

Developers will be able to choose SCM system grounding this choice on
their own preferences. The community will gain access to some famous
source code hosting services such as GitHub or Bitbucket. Among other
benefits it will increase visibility of the community and the
Smalltalk language in whole. It also will lower the entry barriers to
newcomers and as a consequence will help community grow.

Getting rid of sources/changes files offers potentially unlimited
method version history and avoids so called "condensing changes". And
using local git/mercurial repository for this purpose will make
managing changes more natural and uniform in small (every method
accepting) and in large (changes at the project level).

-------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

George Herolyants-3
Oh, sorry, here it is:



++ Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Source code management is highly important aspect of every software
project. Currently in Squeak/Pharo world developer has very limited
choice of such tools. The only available full-featured SCM tool is
Monticello. Other alternatives such as changesets lack in some areas.
Monticello in its own turn has some disadvantages: it can only handle
Smalltalk code while typical software project has many other artefacts
(represented primarily as files) such as documentation, scripts,
diagrams and so on, which would be nice to have in the same
repository. This project aims to get round this and some other
disadvantages by creating a possibility for developers to use modern
distributed source code management tools, which are popular outside of
the Smalltalk community. The most recognized are git and mercurial.

There is already SqueakSVN project but it aims to SVN integration. SVN
is classic client-server SCM. But nowadays this kind of SCM's become
less popular, while popularity of distributed SCM's (such as
git/mercurial) is still growing. It is also crucial for open source
projects like Pharo/Squeak to have distributed SCM to ease development
process. Monticello is highly distributed and the new SCM must be
distributed as well to successfully compete with Monticello. So
git/mercurial fits this goal very well.

**Technical details**

This project may go different ways towards it's goal, depending on
decisions being made during it.

Initial steps will be:
* Examining git/mercurial and choose one of them considering
simplicity of API and it's ease of use, supported operating systems on
and other important factors. There's also pure Smalltalk
implementation of Git storage format on SqueakSource, so this step
will require examining it as well.
* Defining and implementing a file mapping format for the Smalltalk
code structure (classes, methods and so on), in order to support
versioning at the level of separate methods (there is already one
defined by SqueakSVN project so this step may require examining it).
Or examining the ability to avoid such a mapping and store code
directly without needing a working copy on disk.
* Studying how Squeak/Pharo handles system changes (changes of
classes, methods). Then implement handlers for such changes to
translate them to working copy using the mapping or through SCM API.
* (optional but desirable) Implementing Smalltalk interface to the
chosen SCM. It can be based on the SCM's command line interface or on
it's API. These will require using OSProcess or FFI (or writing a
plugin) respectively.

Additional steps may include:
* Implementing import/export tool for Monticello repositories.
* Implementing simple user interface for the chosen SCM so that
programmer can work with it from within the Smalltalk environment.
Integration with widely used OmniBrowser would be even better.

In addition to this a local git/mercurial repository can be used
instead of sources/changes files. This will require:

* Exploring the current mechanism used in Pharo/Squeak to maintain
method version history.
* Replacing it with the developed system which will write changes to
the local git/mercurial repository.

**Benefits to the student**

The student will:
* learn about modern source code management systems;
* study their interfaces, both command line and API;
* study Pharo/Squeak internal mechanisms related to handling of
classes and methods changes and storing of method versions.
* get experience in usage of FFI or writing plugins for Smalltalk VM;
* get experience with making GUI in Pharo/Squeak;
* enjoy writing programs in Smalltalk :)

**Benefits to the community**

Developers will be able to choose SCM system grounding this choice on
their own preferences. The community will gain access to some famous
source code hosting services such as GitHub or Bitbucket. Among other
benefits it will increase visibility of the community and the
Smalltalk language in whole. It also will lower the entry barriers to
newcomers and as a consequence will help community grow.

Getting rid of sources/changes files offers potentially unlimited
method version history and avoids so called "condensing changes". And
using local git/mercurial repository for this purpose will make
managing changes more natural and uniform in small (every method
accepting) and in large (changes at the project level).

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

johnmci

On 2010-03-11, at 11:18 PM, George Herolyants wrote:

> Oh, sorry, here it is:
>
>
>
> ++ Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.
>
> * Defining and implementing a file mapping format for the Smalltalk
> code structure (classes, methods and so on), in order to support
> versioning at the level of separate methods (there is already one
> defined by SqueakSVN project so this step may require examining it).
> Or examining the ability to avoid such a mapping and store code
> directly without needing a working copy on disk.

Ok, sitting on my desktop here is the work from "The squeak world tour", Ginsu
via Joseph Pelrine and John Sarkela.

I think this might have some relevance to the project since it :

I'll quote Joseph:

"maps classes and methods (or better, their semantic definitions) into Subsystems, each of which can have a separate execution environment, allowing remote image work, alternate compilers, passive images, tethered compilation, etc. You can work on and validate code that's not installed in the image."

But it is missing the repository backend.


--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <[hidden email]>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================





_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [GSoC] Idea: Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Mariano Martinez Peck
In reply to this post by George Herolyants-3
Excellent. I have just put it. Which level do you think it should be  ?   beginner, intermediate or advanced ?

Cheers

Mariano

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:18 AM, George Herolyants <[hidden email]> wrote:
Oh, sorry, here it is:



++ Pharo/Squeak integration with git/mercurial.

Source code management is highly important aspect of every software
project. Currently in Squeak/Pharo world developer has very limited
choice of such tools. The only available full-featured SCM tool is
Monticello. Other alternatives such as changesets lack in some areas.
Monticello in its own turn has some disadvantages: it can only handle
Smalltalk code while typical software project has many other artefacts
(represented primarily as files) such as documentation, scripts,
diagrams and so on, which would be nice to have in the same
repository. This project aims to get round this and some other
disadvantages by creating a possibility for developers to use modern
distributed source code management tools, which are popular outside of
the Smalltalk community. The most recognized are git and mercurial.

There is already SqueakSVN project but it aims to SVN integration. SVN
is classic client-server SCM. But nowadays this kind of SCM's become
less popular, while popularity of distributed SCM's (such as
git/mercurial) is still growing. It is also crucial for open source
projects like Pharo/Squeak to have distributed SCM to ease development
process. Monticello is highly distributed and the new SCM must be
distributed as well to successfully compete with Monticello. So
git/mercurial fits this goal very well.

**Technical details**

This project may go different ways towards it's goal, depending on
decisions being made during it.

Initial steps will be:
* Examining git/mercurial and choose one of them considering
simplicity of API and it's ease of use, supported operating systems on
and other important factors. There's also pure Smalltalk
implementation of Git storage format on SqueakSource, so this step
will require examining it as well.
* Defining and implementing a file mapping format for the Smalltalk
code structure (classes, methods and so on), in order to support
versioning at the level of separate methods (there is already one
defined by SqueakSVN project so this step may require examining it).
Or examining the ability to avoid such a mapping and store code
directly without needing a working copy on disk.
* Studying how Squeak/Pharo handles system changes (changes of
classes, methods). Then implement handlers for such changes to
translate them to working copy using the mapping or through SCM API.
* (optional but desirable) Implementing Smalltalk interface to the
chosen SCM. It can be based on the SCM's command line interface or on
it's API. These will require using OSProcess or FFI (or writing a
plugin) respectively.

Additional steps may include:
* Implementing import/export tool for Monticello repositories.
* Implementing simple user interface for the chosen SCM so that
programmer can work with it from within the Smalltalk environment.
Integration with widely used OmniBrowser would be even better.

In addition to this a local git/mercurial repository can be used
instead of sources/changes files. This will require:

* Exploring the current mechanism used in Pharo/Squeak to maintain
method version history.
* Replacing it with the developed system which will write changes to
the local git/mercurial repository.

**Benefits to the student**

The student will:
* learn about modern source code management systems;
* study their interfaces, both command line and API;
* study Pharo/Squeak internal mechanisms related to handling of
classes and methods changes and storing of method versions.
* get experience in usage of FFI or writing plugins for Smalltalk VM;
* get experience with making GUI in Pharo/Squeak;
* enjoy writing programs in Smalltalk :)

**Benefits to the community**

Developers will be able to choose SCM system grounding this choice on
their own preferences. The community will gain access to some famous
source code hosting services such as GitHub or Bitbucket. Among other
benefits it will increase visibility of the community and the
Smalltalk language in whole. It also will lower the entry barriers to
newcomers and as a consequence will help community grow.

Getting rid of sources/changes files offers potentially unlimited
method version history and avoids so called "condensing changes". And
using local git/mercurial repository for this purpose will make
managing changes more natural and uniform in small (every method
accepting) and in large (changes at the project level).


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project