GTInspector on String?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

GTInspector on String?

abergel
Hi!

What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.

Cheers,
Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Ben Coman
I remember thinking a few times that another tab than raw would be a better default for a few different classes. (I can't remember which just now but I'll post agin when I do)

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.

Cheers,
Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
I agree with choosing sensible defaults, but I fail to see what is wrong with showing that a String is composed of Character elements, it is a collection after all.

> On 12 Jan 2015, at 23:16, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I remember thinking a few times that another tab than raw would be a better default for a few different classes. (I can't remember which just now but I'll post agin when I do)
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
> I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Ben Coman
Are you saying you "prefer" the vertical representation more than the horizontal ?

Personally I find it difficult to read the vertical, especially if the text is longer.
If I'm debugging and inspect a variable, it would be nice for the default view to be readable.

cheers -ben


On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
I agree with choosing sensible defaults, but I fail to see what is wrong with showing that a String is composed of Character elements, it is a collection after all.

> On 12 Jan 2015, at 23:16, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I remember thinking a few times that another tab than raw would be a better default for a few different classes. (I can't remember which just now but I'll post agin when I do)
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
> I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

GTPlayground-String-horizonal.png (18K) Download Attachment
GTPlayground-String-vertical.png (43K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

abergel
+1

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Jan 13, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:

Are you saying you "prefer" the vertical representation more than the horizontal ?

Personally I find it difficult to read the vertical, especially if the text is longer.
If I'm debugging and inspect a variable, it would be nice for the default view to be readable.

cheers -ben


On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
I agree with choosing sensible defaults, but I fail to see what is wrong with showing that a String is composed of Character elements, it is a collection after all.

> On 12 Jan 2015, at 23:16, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I remember thinking a few times that another tab than raw would be a better default for a few different classes. (I can't remember which just now but I'll post agin when I do)
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
> I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

<GTPlayground-String-horizonal.png><GTPlayground-String-vertical.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
In reply to this post by Ben Coman

> On 13 Jan 2015, at 17:46, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Are you saying you "prefer" the vertical representation more than the horizontal ?

No

> Personally I find it difficult to read the vertical, especially if the text is longer.
> If I'm debugging and inspect a variable, it would be nice for the default view to be readable.

Yes, me too.

Default = 'String' tab

But Raw and Items should stay as they are, not where they are ;-)
 

> cheers -ben
> ​
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I agree with choosing sensible defaults, but I fail to see what is wrong with showing that a String is composed of Character elements, it is a collection after all.
>
> > On 12 Jan 2015, at 23:16, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > I remember thinking a few times that another tab than raw would be a better default for a few different classes. (I can't remember which just now but I'll post agin when I do)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
> > I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alexandre
> > --
> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> <GTPlayground-String-horizonal.png><GTPlayground-String-vertical.png>_______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Tudor Girba-2
It's already done.

Doru

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 13 Jan 2015, at 17:46, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Are you saying you "prefer" the vertical representation more than the horizontal ?

No

> Personally I find it difficult to read the vertical, especially if the text is longer.
> If I'm debugging and inspect a variable, it would be nice for the default view to be readable.

Yes, me too.

Default = 'String' tab

But Raw and Items should stay as they are, not where they are ;-)

> cheers -ben
> ​
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I agree with choosing sensible defaults, but I fail to see what is wrong with showing that a String is composed of Character elements, it is a collection after all.
>
> > On 12 Jan 2015, at 23:16, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > I remember thinking a few times that another tab than raw would be a better default for a few different classes. (I can't remember which just now but I'll post agin when I do)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
> > I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alexandre
> > --
> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> <GTPlayground-String-horizonal.png><GTPlayground-String-vertical.png>_______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2

> On 13 Jan 2015, at 19:35, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> It's already done.
>
> Doru

Faster than light ;-)
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

stepharo
In reply to this post by abergel
I do not like the default array too.
we have to click on a pane to see the elements if I remember and this is annoying.
Hi!

What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.

Cheers,
Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Ben Coman
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
But Raw and Items should stay as they are, not where they are ;-)

agreed.

> It's already done.

thanks Doru.


On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 13 Jan 2015, at 19:35, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> It's already done.
>
> Doru

Faster than light ;-)
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GTInspector on String?

Tudor Girba-2
In reply to this post by stepharo
As I said, it is already fixed.

Doru

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:57 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
I do not like the default array too.
we have to click on a pane to see the elements if I remember and this is annoying.
Hi!

What is the idea behind getting the items and Raw tab when inspecting a string?
I have the impression that these two tab should be removed. They are rather disturbing. Or at least, having the ‘String’ tab selected by default.

Cheers,
Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev