Hi Paolo,
with the last version of gst I've this bug: Object: nil error: did not understand #methodsFor: Smalltalk.MessageNotUnderstood(Smalltalk.Exception)>>signal (ExcHandling.st:254) Smalltalk.UndefinedObject(Smalltalk.Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #methodsFor: (SysExcept.st:1407) Smalltalk.UndefinedObject>>executeStatements (GTK.star#VFS.ZipFile/Funcs.st:4729) /usr/local/share/smalltalk/GTK.star#VFS.ZipFile/Funcs.st:4731: expected object and I couldn't launch the git version of VisualGST. I think it is time to finish GObjectIntrospection binding. Gwen _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
On 10/18/2010 06:28 PM, Gwenaël Casaccio wrote:
> Hi Paolo, > > with the last version of gst I've this bug: > > Object: nil error: did not understand #methodsFor: > Smalltalk.MessageNotUnderstood(Smalltalk.Exception)>>signal (ExcHandling.st:254) > Smalltalk.UndefinedObject(Smalltalk.Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: > #methodsFor: (SysExcept.st:1407) > Smalltalk.UndefinedObject>>executeStatements > (GTK.star#VFS.ZipFile/Funcs.st:4729) > /usr/local/share/smalltalk/GTK.star#VFS.ZipFile/Funcs.st:4731: expected object The problem is that... the function is called g_bus_something, so the awk script asssumes the Object is called GBus but in that case it is GDBus(Connection) or such... > > and I couldn't launch the git version of VisualGST. you might need to recompile due binary incompatible changes in the development version of GTK+ or such. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther
<[hidden email]> wrote: > On 10/18/2010 06:28 PM, Gwenaël Casaccio wrote: >> Hi Paolo, >> >> with the last version of gst I've this bug: >> >> Object: nil error: did not understand #methodsFor: >> Smalltalk.MessageNotUnderstood(Smalltalk.Exception)>>signal (ExcHandling.st:254) >> Smalltalk.UndefinedObject(Smalltalk.Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: >> #methodsFor: (SysExcept.st:1407) >> Smalltalk.UndefinedObject>>executeStatements >> (GTK.star#VFS.ZipFile/Funcs.st:4729) >> /usr/local/share/smalltalk/GTK.star#VFS.ZipFile/Funcs.st:4731: expected object > > > The problem is that... the function is called > > g_bus_something, so the awk script asssumes the Object is called GBus but in > that case it is GDBus(Connection) or such... > > > >> >> and I couldn't launch the git version of VisualGST. > > you might need to recompile due binary incompatible changes in the development > version of GTK+ or such. > > I've recompiled gst but I will retry > _______________________________________________ > help-smalltalk mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk > _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
In reply to this post by Holger Freyther
On 10/18/2010 06:33 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> The problem is that... the function is called > > g_bus_something, so the awk script asssumes the Object is called GBus but in > that case it is GDBus(Connection) or such... Thanks for the help, try this: --- a/packages/gtk/funcs.awk +++ b/packages/gtk/funcs.awk @@ -100,10 +100,12 @@ BEGIN { ptr_type["#cObject"] = "#cObject" # Fix asymmetry - method_regexp = "^g_param_values?_|^g_param_type_|^gtk_file_chooser_|^gdk_window_" + method_regexp = "^g_bus_|^g_param_values?_|^g_param_type_|^gtk_file_chooser_|^gdk_window_" + prefix_class["g_bus_"] = "GDBusConnection" prefix_class["g_param_value_"] = "GParamSpec" prefix_class["g_param_values_"] = "GParamSpec" prefix_class["g_param_type_"] = "GParamSpec" + self_class["g_bus_"] = "GDBusConnection" self_class["g_param_value_"] = "GParamSpec" self_class["g_param_values_"] = "GParamSpec" self_class["g_param_type_"] = "GParamSpec" Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Hi,
I still have the warnings Gwen On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini <[hidden email]> wrote: > On 10/18/2010 06:33 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: >> The problem is that... the function is called >> >> g_bus_something, so the awk script asssumes the Object is called GBus but in >> that case it is GDBus(Connection) or such... > > Thanks for the help, try this: > > --- a/packages/gtk/funcs.awk > +++ b/packages/gtk/funcs.awk > @@ -100,10 +100,12 @@ BEGIN { > ptr_type["#cObject"] = "#cObject" > > # Fix asymmetry > - method_regexp = "^g_param_values?_|^g_param_type_|^gtk_file_chooser_|^gdk_window_" > + method_regexp = "^g_bus_|^g_param_values?_|^g_param_type_|^gtk_file_chooser_|^gdk_window_" > + prefix_class["g_bus_"] = "GDBusConnection" > prefix_class["g_param_value_"] = "GParamSpec" > prefix_class["g_param_values_"] = "GParamSpec" > prefix_class["g_param_type_"] = "GParamSpec" > + self_class["g_bus_"] = "GDBusConnection" > self_class["g_param_value_"] = "GParamSpec" > self_class["g_param_values_"] = "GParamSpec" > self_class["g_param_type_"] = "GParamSpec" > > Paolo > > _______________________________________________ > help-smalltalk mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk > _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Hi,
talking of awk it seems to me that you should add this: _______________ old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index 7e65823..66ab6fc --- a/packages/gtk/funcs.awk +++ b/packages/gtk/funcs.awk @@ -353,7 +355,10 @@ function ctype( the_type, name ) pointer = ((name ~ /^\*/) || (name ~ /\[[0-9]*\]/)) - res = type[the_type] + if (the_type in type) + res = type[the_type] + else + res = "" if (!pointer || res == "__skip_this__") { @@ -373,7 +378,10 @@ function returned( var ) { pointer = var ~ /\*$/ var = strip(var) - res = type[var] + if (var in type) + res = type[var] + else + res = "" if (!pointer || res == "__skip_this__") { @@ -381,7 +389,11 @@ function returned( var ) res = "#int" } else { - res = ptr_type[res] + if (res in ptr_type) + res = ptr_type[res] + else + res = "" + if (res == "") res = "#{" var "}" } _______________ This is because the statement : "type[var]" is going to make (var in type) true even if before var was not in type. That make the following test pass : if (first_line[2] == "get_type" && (prefixClassName in type)) next I don't know if that is the intention here but at least you can try. Paolo, maybe you can tell. Thanks ----- Message d'origine ---- > De : Gwenaël Casaccio <[hidden email]> > À : Paolo Bonzini <[hidden email]> > Cc : [hidden email] > Envoyé le : Mar 19 octobre 2010, 14h 45min 09s > Objet : Re: [Help-smalltalk] GTK+ binding generator > > Hi, > > I still have the warnings > > Gwen > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On 10/18/2010 06:33 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > >> The problem is that... the function is called > >> > >> g_bus_something, so the awk script asssumes the Object is called GBus but >in > >> that case it is GDBus(Connection) or such... > > > > Thanks for the help, try this: > > > > --- a/packages/gtk/funcs.awk > > +++ b/packages/gtk/funcs.awk > > @@ -100,10 +100,12 @@ BEGIN { > > ptr_type["#cObject"] = "#cObject" > > > > # Fix asymmetry > > - method_regexp = >"^g_param_values?_|^g_param_type_|^gtk_file_chooser_|^gdk_window_" > > + method_regexp = >"^g_bus_|^g_param_values?_|^g_param_type_|^gtk_file_chooser_|^gdk_window_" > > + prefix_class["g_bus_"] = "GDBusConnection" > > prefix_class["g_param_value_"] = "GParamSpec" > > prefix_class["g_param_values_"] = "GParamSpec" > > prefix_class["g_param_type_"] = "GParamSpec" > > + self_class["g_bus_"] = "GDBusConnection" > > self_class["g_param_value_"] = "GParamSpec" > > self_class["g_param_values_"] = "GParamSpec" > > self_class["g_param_type_"] = "GParamSpec" > > > > Paolo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > help-smalltalk mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk > > > > _______________________________________________ > help-smalltalk mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk > _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
On 10/19/2010 03:03 PM, Mathieu Suen wrote:
> I don't know if that is the intention here but at least you can try. > Paolo, maybe you can tell. Ok, I understand now. Yes, it looks correct. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |