Git + Moose ? (Kumpel ?)

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Git + Moose ? (Kumpel ?)

simondenier
As another side project which could be of interest here, in order to demo the Moose platform, I would like to load a Git repo into Moose. I was thinking of using Kumpel for example and one of the current Git projects on Squeaksource.

It looks like http://www.squeaksource.com/FSGit.html is the most recent project (May 2011). Is it up to date with the latest version of Pharo/FileSystem? I could load it in a 1.3 Core (a few tests red) but not in a Moose 4.4 (problem with RPackage).

I am not knowledgeable in either FSGit or Kumpel. Is anyone working on something similar? Would it be difficult or cumbersome?

--
Simon Denier


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Git + Moose ? (Kumpel ?)

Tudor Girba-2
Hi Simon,

This would be a nice project.

On 20 Jun 2011, at 17:06, Simon Denier wrote:

> As another side project which could be of interest here, in order to demo the Moose platform, I would like to load a Git repo into Moose. I was thinking of using Kumpel for example and one of the current Git projects on Squeaksource.
>
> It looks like http://www.squeaksource.com/FSGit.html is the most recent project (May 2011). Is it up to date with the latest version of Pharo/FileSystem? I could load it in a 1.3 Core (a few tests red) but not in a Moose 4.4 (problem with RPackage).
>
> I am not knowledgeable in either FSGit or Kumpel. Is anyone working on something similar? Would it be difficult or cumbersome?

FSGit is definitely the way to go.

Now, Kumpel has a model that is close to SVN, but I do not think it is suitable to model the distributed versioning of Git. I did not have a chance to look at FSGit, but is the model that is offered by it not enough, without requiring wrapping?

Cheers,
Doru


> --
> Simon Denier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."







_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Git + Moose ? (Kumpel ?)

simondenier

On 20 juin 2011, at 17:15, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
> This would be a nice project.


Just, I don't have that much time.


>
> On 20 Jun 2011, at 17:06, Simon Denier wrote:
>
>> As another side project which could be of interest here, in order to demo the Moose platform, I would like to load a Git repo into Moose. I was thinking of using Kumpel for example and one of the current Git projects on Squeaksource.
>>
>> It looks like http://www.squeaksource.com/FSGit.html is the most recent project (May 2011). Is it up to date with the latest version of Pharo/FileSystem? I could load it in a 1.3 Core (a few tests red) but not in a Moose 4.4 (problem with RPackage).
>>
>> I am not knowledgeable in either FSGit or Kumpel. Is anyone working on something similar? Would it be difficult or cumbersome?
>
> FSGit is definitely the way to go.
>
> Now, Kumpel has a model that is close to SVN, but I do not think it is suitable to model the distributed versioning of Git. I did not have a chance to look at FSGit, but is the model that is offered by it not enough, without requiring wrapping?


I  played a bit with FSGit, what it does is reify the Git model into Pharo (with commits, trees, and blobs, http://eagain.net/articles/git-for-computer-scientists/ ), which is different from the traditional file system model. Of course you can then navigate the Git model to extract information about the current files.

I stumbled upon a bug yesterday so I have to ask more information about FS-Git.




>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> --
>> Simon Denier
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
Simon Denier




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Git + Moose ? (Kumpel ?)

simondenier
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2

On 20 juin 2011, at 17:15, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
> Now, Kumpel has a model that is close to SVN, but I do not think it is suitable to model the distributed versioning of Git. I did not have a chance to look at FSGit, but is the model that is offered by it not enough, without requiring wrapping?


A little How-to or quick start on the Kumpel webpage would be good too. I have no idea what Kumpel can do/how to use it :)

--
Simon Denier




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev