Hi Juan,
May I suggest that you use more specific names for the repositories? I think the names of Cuis repositories should always start with Cuis-Smalltalk. (I really like the fact that Smalltalk is now part of the name for SEO reasons.) I forked your new Development repository and now it is named bpieber/Development. No indication that it is Cuis-Smalltalk. In addition, I think you could easily avoid two repositories for Stable and Development by using branches and maybe tags. At least that seems to be the more idiomatic way of using Git. I believe it is also slightly less confusing for newbies. So my preferred setup would be to have one repository named Cuis-Smalltalk/Cuis-Smalltalk. I know, the changes mean some rework. But I guess now would be a better time than later. Cheers, Bernhard _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Hi Bernhard,
On 7/27/2013 10:55 AM, Bernhard Pieber wrote: > Hi Juan, > > May I suggest that you use more specific names for the repositories? I think the names of Cuis repositories should always start with Cuis-Smalltalk. (I really like the fact that Smalltalk is now part of the name for SEO reasons.) I forked your new Development repository and now it is named bpieber/Development. No indication that it is Cuis-Smalltalk. > > In addition, I think you could easily avoid two repositories for Stable and Development by using branches and maybe tags. At least that seems to be the more idiomatic way of using Git. I believe it is also slightly less confusing for newbies. > > So my preferred setup would be to have one repository named Cuis-Smalltalk/Cuis-Smalltalk. > > I know, the changes mean some rework. But I guess now would be a better time than later. > > Cheers, > Bernhard You're right. If everybody agrees, I'll create two new repos: Cuis-Smalltalk (stable release) Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev (updated image, maybe preloaded with packages, and update stream) I'd rather not use a single repo with branches... Not yet, at least. For newbies, the easiest would be to grab the "clone as Zip file" @ Cuis-Smalltalk. No need to install or know about Git and GitHub... Thanks for the feedback! Cheers, Juan Vuletich _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Hi Juan,
I am fine with that. You know, there is a GitHub feature to rename a repository. I just renamed the STE repo to Cuis-Smalltalk-StyledTextEditor. ;-) Cheers, Bernhard Am 28.07.2013 um 21:17 schrieb Juan Vuletich: > Hi Bernhard, > > On 7/27/2013 10:55 AM, Bernhard Pieber wrote: >> Hi Juan, >> >> May I suggest that you use more specific names for the repositories? I think the names of Cuis repositories should always start with Cuis-Smalltalk. (I really like the fact that Smalltalk is now part of the name for SEO reasons.) I forked your new Development repository and now it is named bpieber/Development. No indication that it is Cuis-Smalltalk. >> >> In addition, I think you could easily avoid two repositories for Stable and Development by using branches and maybe tags. At least that seems to be the more idiomatic way of using Git. I believe it is also slightly less confusing for newbies. >> >> So my preferred setup would be to have one repository named Cuis-Smalltalk/Cuis-Smalltalk. >> >> I know, the changes mean some rework. But I guess now would be a better time than later. >> >> Cheers, >> Bernhard > > You're right. If everybody agrees, I'll create two new repos: > Cuis-Smalltalk (stable release) > Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev (updated image, maybe preloaded with packages, and update stream) > > I'd rather not use a single repo with branches... Not yet, at least. For newbies, the easiest would be to grab the "clone as Zip file" @ Cuis-Smalltalk. No need to install or know about Git and GitHub... > > Thanks for the feedback! > > Cheers, > Juan Vuletich > > _______________________________________________ > Cuis mailing list > [hidden email] > http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Hey, thanks for the tip! Repos renamed.
Cheers, Juan Vuletich On 7/28/2013 4:25 PM, Bernhard Pieber wrote: > Hi Juan, > > I am fine with that. You know, there is a GitHub feature to rename a repository. I just renamed the STE repo to Cuis-Smalltalk-StyledTextEditor. ;-) > > Cheers, > Bernhard > > Am 28.07.2013 um 21:17 schrieb Juan Vuletich: > >> Hi Bernhard, >> >> On 7/27/2013 10:55 AM, Bernhard Pieber wrote: >>> Hi Juan, >>> >>> May I suggest that you use more specific names for the repositories? I think the names of Cuis repositories should always start with Cuis-Smalltalk. (I really like the fact that Smalltalk is now part of the name for SEO reasons.) I forked your new Development repository and now it is named bpieber/Development. No indication that it is Cuis-Smalltalk. >>> >>> In addition, I think you could easily avoid two repositories for Stable and Development by using branches and maybe tags. At least that seems to be the more idiomatic way of using Git. I believe it is also slightly less confusing for newbies. >>> >>> So my preferred setup would be to have one repository named Cuis-Smalltalk/Cuis-Smalltalk. >>> >>> I know, the changes mean some rework. But I guess now would be a better time than later. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Bernhard >> You're right. If everybody agrees, I'll create two new repos: >> Cuis-Smalltalk (stable release) >> Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev (updated image, maybe preloaded with packages, and update stream) >> >> I'd rather not use a single repo with branches... Not yet, at least. For newbies, the easiest would be to grab the "clone as Zip file" @ Cuis-Smalltalk. No need to install or know about Git and GitHub... >> >> Thanks for the feedback! >> >> Cheers, >> Juan Vuletich >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cuis mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org > > _______________________________________________ > Cuis mailing list > [hidden email] > http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org > _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Good solution and a demonstration that github is a useful tool for
Smalltalk development. --Hannes On 7/28/13, Juan Vuletich <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hey, thanks for the tip! Repos renamed. > > Cheers, > Juan Vuletich > > On 7/28/2013 4:25 PM, Bernhard Pieber wrote: >> Hi Juan, >> >> I am fine with that. You know, there is a GitHub feature to rename a >> repository. I just renamed the STE repo to >> Cuis-Smalltalk-StyledTextEditor. ;-) >> >> Cheers, >> Bernhard >> >> Am 28.07.2013 um 21:17 schrieb Juan Vuletich: >> >>> Hi Bernhard, >>> >>> On 7/27/2013 10:55 AM, Bernhard Pieber wrote: >>>> Hi Juan, >>>> >>>> May I suggest that you use more specific names for the repositories? I >>>> think the names of Cuis repositories should always start with >>>> Cuis-Smalltalk. (I really like the fact that Smalltalk is now part of >>>> the name for SEO reasons.) I forked your new Development repository and >>>> now it is named bpieber/Development. No indication that it is >>>> Cuis-Smalltalk. >>>> >>>> In addition, I think you could easily avoid two repositories for Stable >>>> and Development by using branches and maybe tags. At least that seems to >>>> be the more idiomatic way of using Git. I believe it is also slightly >>>> less confusing for newbies. >>>> >>>> So my preferred setup would be to have one repository named >>>> Cuis-Smalltalk/Cuis-Smalltalk. >>>> >>>> I know, the changes mean some rework. But I guess now would be a better >>>> time than later. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Bernhard >>> You're right. If everybody agrees, I'll create two new repos: >>> Cuis-Smalltalk (stable release) >>> Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev (updated image, maybe preloaded with packages, and >>> update stream) >>> >>> I'd rather not use a single repo with branches... Not yet, at least. For >>> newbies, the easiest would be to grab the "clone as Zip file" @ >>> Cuis-Smalltalk. No need to install or know about Git and GitHub... >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Juan Vuletich >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cuis mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cuis mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Cuis mailing list > [hidden email] > http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org > _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |