Smalltalk › Gemtalk › GLASS

[Glass] [GLASS] [Seaside]

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

6 messages Options

Reg Krock-3

[Glass] [GLASS] [Seaside]

Which configuration of seaside should be loaded into Gemstone/S 3.2?

Regards,

Reg
_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

Dale Henrichs-3

Re: [Glass] [GLASS] [Seaside]

Reg,

I've run the 3.0.9.1 Seaside tests against 3.2 and they passed.

I also did some work for 3.0.10 and 3.2, but I seem to recall hearing that 3.0.10 "shouldn't be used with gemstone", but I can't find the reference ... looking at the diffs the Grease version has been updated and a handful of packages were updated ...

according to #stable it looks like 3.0.12 is supposed to be the latest version, but 3.0.10, 3.0.11 and 3.0.12 are all blessed as development, so I'm not sure how stable they actually are ... and I didn't port them to GemStone 3.2 _because_ they were all blessed as development.

AFAIK, 3.0.9 is the last version that was "released" and 3.0.9.1 has been ported to GemStone 3.2 ...

Perhaps someone else, can provide better information:)

Dale

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Reg Krock <[hidden email]> wrote:

Which configuration of seaside should be loaded into Gemstone/S 3.2?

Regards,

Reg
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

Gerhard Obermann

Re: [Glass] [GLASS] [Seaside]

In reply to this post by Reg Krock-3

Hi!

I tried to load Seaside 3.1 in an upgraded GS 3.2 from 3.1.0.5 DB using the instructions on https://github.com/glassdb/Seaside31.

I get an exception immediately.

Gerhard

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Reg Krock <[hidden email]> wrote:

Which configuration of seaside should be loaded into Gemstone/S 3.2?

Regards,

Reg
_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

Dale Henrichs-3

Re: [Glass] [GLASS] [Seaside]

Gerhard,

See my earlier email about priorities ... I can focus my efforts where it is needed most:)...

Dale

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Gerhard Obermann <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi!

I tried to load Seaside 3.1 in an upgraded GS 3.2 from 3.1.0.5 DB using the instructions on https://github.com/glassdb/Seaside31.

I get an exception immediately.

Gerhard

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Reg Krock <[hidden email]> wrote:

Which configuration of seaside should be loaded into Gemstone/S 3.2?

Regards,

Reg
_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

Dale Henrichs-3

Re: [Glass] [GLASS] [Seaside]

In reply to this post by Gerhard Obermann

Moving forward I (or Johan) will add GemStone3.2 to the travis build lineup[1] so that we can ensure that Seaside31 loads cleanly in both GemStone3.1 and GemStone3.2.

Dale

[1] https://travis-ci.org/glassdb/Seaside31/builds/25442932

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Gerhard Obermann <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi!

I tried to load Seaside 3.1 in an upgraded GS 3.2 from 3.1.0.5 DB using the instructions on https://github.com/glassdb/Seaside31.

I get an exception immediately.

Gerhard

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Reg Krock <[hidden email]> wrote:

Which configuration of seaside should be loaded into Gemstone/S 3.2?

Regards,

Reg
_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

Dale Henrichs-3

Re: [Glass] [GLASS] [Seaside]

It turns out that Seaside31 does load without errors into virgin seaside extent no need to use the old version ... I think Gerhard wasn't necessarily loading into an "empty" extent ...

Dale

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:

Moving forward I (or Johan) will add GemStone3.2 to the travis build lineup[1] so that we can ensure that Seaside31 loads cleanly in both GemStone3.1 and GemStone3.2.

Dale

[1] https://travis-ci.org/glassdb/Seaside31/builds/25442932

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Gerhard Obermann <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi!

I tried to load Seaside 3.1 in an upgraded GS 3.2 from 3.1.0.5 DB using the instructions on https://github.com/glassdb/Seaside31.

I get an exception immediately.

Gerhard

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Reg Krock <[hidden email]> wrote:

Which configuration of seaside should be loaded into Gemstone/S 3.2?

Regards,

Reg
_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass

_______________________________________________
Glass mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass