[Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
Locked
[Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
 
|
Does anyone have a working copy of SIXX using the XMLPullParser in 3.1?
If not I'll work on that soonish _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
Uhhh I will be very interested in this as well. Not only in GemStone but also in Pharo ;) I found that Johan started to work in a port of the XMLPullParser for GemStone: https://github.com/glassdb/XMLPullParser
But we still miss the SIXX integration. I was reading http://kentreis.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/deep-sixx-with-xml-pull-parser/
And..from the squeak repo from there: http://www.squeaksource.com/XMLPullParser.html It seems the adapted/modified SIXX is in that repo. See SIXX-kdt.143. I did a diff against SIXX-mu.141. There are some changes....
I was browsing BaselineOfSixx, and I found SIXX.310-PaulDeBruicker.182. So seems like we are 40 versions ahead? best, On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Paul DeBruicker <[hidden email]> wrote: Does anyone have a working copy of SIXX using the XMLPullParser in 3.1? Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
On 28 Jul 2014, at 15:03, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote: > I found that Johan started to work in a port of the XMLPullParser for GemStone: https://github.com/glassdb/XMLPullParser The XMLPullParser port is fully working (actually using it in production for a couple of months already), but I think I need to sync with the latest changes of smalltalkhub... Johan _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
I tried to sort the XMLPullParser out for 3.1 but didn't have the right time/brain horsepower combination to figure it out but was able to use STON to transfer the objects from Pharo to GemStone.
|
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Paul DeBruicker <[hidden email]> wrote: I tried to sort the XMLPullParser out for 3.1 but didn't have the right Hi Paul, is that code available somewhere? (I know where it is STON) but I wonder about all the intercommuication between pharo and gemstone. Does ston load cleanly in Gemstone? Did you need to modify code in either side? Did you see that the SIXX serializer has a large problem with memory consumption and the stack limit size in Gemstone? this is mainly because of the type of XML parser used.. But anyway...do you know if the STON parser would have this kind of problem too? In other words....if I am already facing memory/stack limits of SIXX, do you think STON would at least give me some air? Note that I don't have much of a problem that it takes time. To be honest, I would prefer ston rather than XML either way.. but sixx seem to have been used quite a lot in Gemstone-Pharo. I am not sure in Gemstone how it would work. Anyway....I have large graphs to check. So if you give me some hints I can experiment as well and share my results. Thanks,
Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
Administrator
|
Mariano, Dale uses STON for all data exchange between GemStone and Pharo in tODE, so I think it is safe to say that there is a viable solution for you. Richard |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
In reply to this post by GLASS mailing list
Hi Mariano,
I just exported the graph to a STON file and then read it in from GemStone. It was a 3.5MB ston file once I finished getting the serialization/materialization right. My intuition is that STON is a more compact format than SIXX, but I have no proof. Maybe serialize a portion of your graph and compare file sizes. I wish I had a better answer or better tooling for you. Paul
|
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
In reply to this post by Richard Sargent
Depending upon the structure that you are exporting STON may need work ... variable classes with instance variables are not handled cleanly by STON (see Text) ... OTOH STON does handle intra-object references ... haven't paid attention to whether STON recurses through data structures or not which is the thing that gets you in trouble with the stack size ... My plate is pretty full, but if I had some pointers as to the problems that you hit with the XML PULL parser I might be able to pitch in and get over the hump... On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Richard Sargent via Glass <[hidden email]> wrote: GLASS mailing list wrote _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
Johan's latest work on the XML-PULL parser is here[1] and all the tests are green[2] as of last week ... Dale [1] https://github.com/GsDevKit/XMLParser [2] https://travis-ci.org/GsDevKit/XMLPullParser On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Re: [Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?
|
|
Hey guys,
The XMLPullParser works fine but the test coverage is perhaps a bit small. It’s also almost an exact copy of the smalltalkhub version for Pharo. I’m using the one right before the latest in production on GS 2.4 without any issues. My experiments with SIXX date back almost 4 years, and I used the ‘commit on almost out of memory’ trick at that time. So I’m afraid I don’t know how to set up the pull parser with SIXX. Johan On 27 Sep 2014, at 02:08, Dale Henrichs via Glass <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
«
Return to GLASS
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |