The error is Working copy for Gofer not found
To reproduce it, update your Pharo 1.0 core image to 10505 and evaluate any load of any ConfigurationOf...for example (ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras project version: '1.0') load The error is not even fixed evaluating: [ Gofer gofer load ] on: Error do: [ :err | err retry ]. Gofer gofer recompile. I attach PharoDebug.log Any help? Thanks Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project PharoDebug.log (196K) Download Attachment |
What version of Gofer is loaded into the Core?
Dale ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[hidden email]> wrote: | The error is Working copy for Gofer not found | | To reproduce it, update your Pharo 1.0 core image to 10505 and | evaluate any | load of any ConfigurationOf...for example | | (ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras project version: '1.0') load | | The error is not even fixed evaluating: | | [ Gofer gofer load ] | on: Error | do: [ :err | err retry ]. | Gofer gofer recompile. | | I attach PharoDebug.log | | Any help? | | Thanks | | Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Gofer-Core-AdrianLienhard.114 from http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo
cheers mariano On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote: What version of Gofer is loaded into the Core? _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
The packaging for Gofer has changed, so that breaks the ensureMetacello code that was trying to determine the version of Gofer that was loaded ... there is no package named Gofer anymore, so I'll have to figure something out ...
Dale ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[hidden email]> wrote: | Gofer-Core-AdrianLienhard.114 from | http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo | cheers | | mariano | | On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Dale Henrichs | <[hidden email]>wrote: | | > What version of Gofer is loaded into the Core? | > | > Dale | > ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[hidden email]> wrote: | > | > | The error is Working copy for Gofer not found | > | | > | To reproduce it, update your Pharo 1.0 core image to 10505 and | > | evaluate any | > | load of any ConfigurationOf...for example | > | | > | (ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras project version: '1.0') load | > | | > | The error is not even fixed evaluating: | > | | > | [ Gofer gofer load ] | > | on: Error | > | do: [ :err | err retry ]. | > | Gofer gofer recompile. | > | | > | I attach PharoDebug.log | > | | > | Any help? | > | | > | Thanks | > | | > | Mariano | > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Ahhh yes, I see. In 10502, there was a package called Gofer with two categories: Gofer-Core and Gofer-Tests
In 10505 there are two packages: Gofer-Core and Gofer-Test each with only one category. So...it was been split. What I don't know if it this was intended or not :( Mariano On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote: The packaging for Gofer has changed, so that breaks the ensureMetacello code that was trying to determine the version of Gofer that was loaded ... there is no package named Gofer anymore, so I'll have to figure something out ... _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Mariano,
I've updated ConfigurationOfMetacello so that ensureMetacello method works on 10504 and later Pharo images. FYI, since 1.0-beta.18 is still the 'latest version' Gofer-lr.109 will be loaded over the top of Gofer-Core, but things appear to still be functional. When I release 1.0-beta.19, the Gofer-Core packages will be loaded and used moving forward. I'm in the middle of development of 1.0-beta.19 and not quite ready to turn it loose. Dale ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <[hidden email]> wrote: | The error is Working copy for Gofer not found | | To reproduce it, update your Pharo 1.0 core image to 10505 and | evaluate any | load of any ConfigurationOf...for example | | (ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras project version: '1.0') load | | The error is not even fixed evaluating: | | [ Gofer gofer load ] | on: Error | do: [ :err | err retry ]. | Gofer gofer recompile. | | I attach PharoDebug.log | | Any help? | | Thanks | | Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> Ahhh yes, I see. In 10502, there was a package called Gofer with two > categories: Gofer-Core and Gofer-Tests > In 10505 there are two packages: Gofer-Core and Gofer-Test each with > only one category. > > So...it was been split. What I don't know if it this was intended or not :( If you go to SqueakSource and look at the details for: Gofer-Core-AdrianLienhard.114.mcz Then choose "Show History" for that package, you'll see the comment: Gofer-Core-lr.111 (5 January 2010, 10:49:26 am) - split tests into separate packages So it looks like it's intentional. IMHO, I think test cases should be in a separate package. -- Yanni _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Dale
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote: Mariano, Thanks Dale. I tested again now and it works :) Thank you very much.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Yanni Chiu
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Yanni Chiu <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks for checking!!!
Me too. That's why I did that change in OCompletion and I will do it also in RoelTyper :) Cheers Mariano -- _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |