Hi
I found issue 534 [1] relating to this. Does anybody know what the porting situation of Slime is? Is it just Pharo/Squeak only? [1] https://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=534 Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
Afaik, Slime never worked on Gemstone but I am puzzled how an #isKindOf: would be more portable than an #isXXX message. If this fails on VA or VW, I would suggest they implement an extension method.
Johan (sent from my mobile) > On 06 Apr 2014, at 19:18, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi > > I found issue 534 [1] relating to this. Does anybody know what the > porting situation of Slime is? Is it just Pharo/Squeak only? > > [1] https://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=534 > > Cheers > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > seaside-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
On 06.04.2014, at 19:55, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote: Afaik, Slime never worked on Gemstone but I am puzzled how an #isKindOf: would be more portable than an #isXXX message. If this fails on VA or VW, I would suggest they implement an extension method. Johan (sent from my mobile) On 06 Apr 2014, at 19:18, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi I found issue 534 [1] relating to this. Does anybody know what the porting situation of Slime is? Is it just Pharo/Squeak only? [1] https://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=534 #isKindOf: Association fails for (Class) Literals in Compiled methods in Squeak4.4 and Squeak4.5. They simply aren't. I tested #isVariableBinding in Squeak4.4/4.5, Pharo3 and GemStone 2.4. Best -Tobias _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev signature.asc (1K) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Johan Brichau-2
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Afaik, Slime never worked on Gemstone but I am puzzled how an #isKindOf: would be more portable than an #isXXX message. #isKindOf: is ANSI #isXXX is not. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
On 06.04.2014, at 21:39, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Afaik, Slime never worked on Gemstone but I am puzzled how an #isKindOf: would be more portable than an #isXXX message. > > #isKindOf: is ANSI #isXXX is not. Right, but is 'Method literals are a kind-of Association' Ansi? :/ (No flaming/ranting intended) Best -Tobias _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev signature.asc (1K) Download Attachment |
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On 06.04.2014, at 21:39, Philippe Marschall <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Johan Brichau <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Afaik, Slime never worked on Gemstone but I am puzzled how an #isKindOf: would be more portable than an #isXXX message. >> >> #isKindOf: is ANSI #isXXX is not. > > Right, but is 'Method literals are a kind-of Association' Ansi? :/ > (No flaming/ranting intended) No, it's not. And with the current state of things regarding Slime portabiltiy the change is fine. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ seaside-dev mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |