[HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
Locked
 
|
Hi,
I’m trying to get ready the download page for Pharo 5.0… who should happen next monday :) So, I create a download page: http://pharo.org/download-50 and one for linux: http://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation-50 For linux, I made linux general centos oldLibC but 1) I cannot test them 2) list is incomplete, we are still missing: - ubuntu ppa - Nix - ArchLinux Can responsables for those platforms take action and test/prepare packages? thanks! Esteban |
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> writes:
> - ubuntu ppa the ubuntu ppa package is Pharo 4 only as of now > - Nix in nix we have both pharo 4 and pharo 5 VMs. I use both everyday. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill |
|
|
> On 27 Apr 2016, at 15:31, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> writes: > >> - ubuntu ppa > > the ubuntu ppa package is Pharo 4 only as of now it shouldn’t :) > >> - Nix > > in nix we have both pharo 4 and pharo 5 VMs. I use both everyday. cool :) > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill |
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
Will do the CentOS 6 thing. Phil On Apr 27, 2016 3:26 PM, "Esteban Lorenzano" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi, |
|
|
I replicated the jobs that were creating centos vms (I think that’s for 6)… if you can try those, it would be cool :) Esteban
|
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
Hi Esteban, i found a problem with one of the packages, see below ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. 6521) Operating System: Debian 7.10 x86_64 - unzip Pharo5.0-linux-oldLibC.zip - cd pharo5.0 - ./pharo Actual Message: This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. 6521). Press CR to quit...^C On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
On 30/04/16 23:13, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote:
> Hi Esteban, > i found a problem with one of the packages, see below > > ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. 6521) So you have a non-spur vm there. You need a spur one Stephan |
|
|
> On 01 May 2016, at 10:59, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On 30/04/16 23:13, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: >> Hi Esteban, >> i found a problem with one of the packages, see below >> >> ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. 6521) > > So you have a non-spur vm there. You need a spur one yes, but Pharo5.0-linux-oldLibC.zip should download a spur vm… I need to review that :) Esteban > > Stephan > > |
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
Hi Esteban,
I tried again and it doesn't work. :( But now i found another issue, if you take a look to pharo5.0/shared folder you will see the file PharoV40.sources (wrong version for this release) thanks On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
|
|
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras
<[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Esteban, > I tried again and it doesn't work. :( > But now i found another issue, if you take a look to pharo5.0/shared > folder you will see the file PharoV40.sources (wrong version for this > release) This is the correct sources for Pharo5-*beta*. It doesn't become PharoV50.sources until the changes file is compacted for actual *release*. However I understand the confusion. I think this naming is based off the Squeak workflow, where IIUC they just work in, for example 4.5, and don't call it 4.6 until just weeks before release. But we've called it Pharo 5 (beta) for 12 months. I have thought a few times myself that maybe for Pharo 6 we could have PharoV60dev.sources and later PharoV60.sources. cheers -ben > > thanks > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> >> >> > On 01 May 2016, at 10:59, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> > On 30/04/16 23:13, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: >> >> Hi Esteban, >> >> i found a problem with one of the packages, see below >> >> >> >> ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. >> >> 6521) >> > >> > So you have a non-spur vm there. You need a spur one >> >> yes, but Pharo5.0-linux-oldLibC.zip should download a spur vm… I need to >> review that :) >> >> Esteban >> >> > >> > Stephan >> > >> > >> >> > > > > -- > Bernardo E.C. > > Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
Ben, This thread mail subject is Pharo 5.0 release (there is no beta), and even if you are right please take a look at http://files.pharo.org/sources/, there's a PharoV50.sources. And also if you try to open a Pharo5.0.image , it will ask for the file PharoV50.sources. thanks On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
|
|
Thanks for the heads up. The past few releases had some notice when
the changes file was being condensed. cheers -ben On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <[hidden email]> wrote: > Ben, > This thread mail subject is Pharo 5.0 release (there is no beta), and even > if you are right > please take a look at http://files.pharo.org/sources/, there's a > PharoV50.sources. > And also if you try to open a Pharo5.0.image , it will ask for the file > PharoV50.sources. > > thanks > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > Hi Esteban, >> > I tried again and it doesn't work. :( >> > But now i found another issue, if you take a look to pharo5.0/shared >> > folder you will see the file PharoV40.sources (wrong version for this >> > release) >> >> This is the correct sources for Pharo5-*beta*. It doesn't become >> PharoV50.sources until the changes file is compacted for actual >> *release*. However I understand the confusion. I think this naming >> is based off the Squeak workflow, where IIUC they just work in, for >> example 4.5, and don't call it 4.6 until just weeks before release. >> But we've called it Pharo 5 (beta) for 12 months. >> >> I have thought a few times myself that maybe for Pharo 6 we could have >> PharoV60dev.sources and later PharoV60.sources. >> >> cheers -ben >> >> >> > >> > thanks >> > >> > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 01 May 2016, at 10:59, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On 30/04/16 23:13, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: >> >> >> Hi Esteban, >> >> >> i found a problem with one of the packages, see below >> >> >> >> >> >> ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. >> >> >> 6521) >> >> > >> >> > So you have a non-spur vm there. You need a spur one >> >> >> >> yes, but Pharo5.0-linux-oldLibC.zip should download a spur vm… I need >> >> to >> >> review that :) >> >> >> >> Esteban >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Stephan >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Bernardo E.C. >> > >> > Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. >> > > > > -- > Bernardo E.C. > > Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
yes, we forgot… I will send a note.
> On 06 May 2016, at 00:44, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up. The past few releases had some notice when > the changes file was being condensed. > cheers -ben > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Ben, >> This thread mail subject is Pharo 5.0 release (there is no beta), and even >> if you are right >> please take a look at http://files.pharo.org/sources/, there's a >> PharoV50.sources. >> And also if you try to open a Pharo5.0.image , it will ask for the file >> PharoV50.sources. >> >> thanks >> >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> Hi Esteban, >>>> I tried again and it doesn't work. :( >>>> But now i found another issue, if you take a look to pharo5.0/shared >>>> folder you will see the file PharoV40.sources (wrong version for this >>>> release) >>> >>> This is the correct sources for Pharo5-*beta*. It doesn't become >>> PharoV50.sources until the changes file is compacted for actual >>> *release*. However I understand the confusion. I think this naming >>> is based off the Squeak workflow, where IIUC they just work in, for >>> example 4.5, and don't call it 4.6 until just weeks before release. >>> But we've called it Pharo 5 (beta) for 12 months. >>> >>> I have thought a few times myself that maybe for Pharo 6 we could have >>> PharoV60dev.sources and later PharoV60.sources. >>> >>> cheers -ben >>> >>> >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 01 May 2016, at 10:59, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 30/04/16 23:13, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Esteban, >>>>>>> i found a problem with one of the packages, see below >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. >>>>>>> 6521) >>>>>> >>>>>> So you have a non-spur vm there. You need a spur one >>>>> >>>>> yes, but Pharo5.0-linux-oldLibC.zip should download a spur vm… I need >>>>> to >>>>> review that :) >>>>> >>>>> Esteban >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Stephan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bernardo E.C. >>>> >>>> Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Bernardo E.C. >> >> Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. > |
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
In reply to this post by vonbecmann
i submit an issue
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <[hidden email]> wrote:
Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
|
|
yes we know. but this is a vm problem, not an image one. we will provide a centos vm as soon as we find a bit of time. Esteban
|
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
great!. On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
|
|
btw can you test it?
I might have fixed it yesterday :P
|
Re: [HELP WANTED] Getting ready for Pharo 5.0 release (CentOS, oldLibC, Nix, ArchLinux, and others)
|
|
i can test it on debian 7.10 x86_64, and by testing i mean follow the "steps to reproduce" that i mentioned. when you mention "test it", what does it mean? (running all the tests in the image??), how do you test the vm? On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. |
|
|
Nono, just see if this version works :)
|
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |