HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:22 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello list,
>
>  
>
> We are currently using a WSOpentTalk SOAP service to
> integrate with one of our customer web services.
>
>  
>
> The tests were going well, but in the meantime, an additional
> requirement has popped up: the service should go through a
> proxy using basic HTTP authentication instead of
> communicating directly with the final WS endpoint.
>
>  
>
> Is there support for this in VW 7.7?
>
>  
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
>  
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:22 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello list,
>
>
>
> We are currently using a WSOpentTalk SOAP service to
> integrate with one of our customer web services.
>
>
>
> The tests were going well, but in the meantime, an additional
> requirement has popped up: the service should go through a
> proxy using basic HTTP authentication instead of
> communicating directly with the final WS endpoint.
>
>
>
> Is there support for this in VW 7.7?
>
>
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:22 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello list,
>
>
>
> We are currently using a WSOpentTalk SOAP service to integrate with
> one of our customer web services.
>
>
>
> The tests were going well, but in the meantime, an additional
> requirement has popped up: the service should go through a proxy using
> basic HTTP authentication instead of communicating directly with the
> final WS endpoint.
>
>
>
> Is there support for this in VW 7.7?
>
>
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:22 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello list,
>
>
>
> We are currently using a WSOpentTalk SOAP service to integrate with
> one of our customer web services.
>
>
>
> The tests were going well, but in the meantime, an additional
> requirement has popped up: the service should go through a proxy using
> basic HTTP authentication instead of communicating directly with the
> final WS endpoint.
>
>
>
> Is there support for this in VW 7.7?
>
>
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Philippe
>
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Demaecker [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:26 AM
> To: Philippe Demaecker; Kogan, Tamara; [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello,
>
> We were able to figure it out with the help of a collegue. It
> seems the use of structs vs. real objects is configurable, so
> the switch to WsdlClient should be an easy one.
>
> Best,
> Philippe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: dinsdag 22 maart 2011 9:50
> To: Kogan, Tamara; [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems OT uses Struct objects to represent complex objects,
> which means no compatibility with the my implementation, right?
>
> I read from the 7.7 docs:
>
> "Class WsdlClient supports all standard forms of HTTP
> authentication (e.g., Basic, Digest and NTLM schemas).
> Instances of WsdlClient use an HttpClient object as a
> transport mechanism, and the latter provides the actual
> support for authentication.HTTP authentication is presently
> available only for applications using the WsdlClient. This
> functionality is under active development for Opentalk and
> will be included in a future release."
>
> What is the status on this? Is there anything I can use yet?
>
> Thank you,
> Philippe
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: maandag 21 maart 2011 23:28
> To: Kogan, Tamara; [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello Tamara,
>
> Thanks for the tip. I indeed read in the doc that
> authentication was supported using the WsdlClient.
>
> The whole interface has already been developed using the OT
> and I'm not sure how much work it will be to rewrite the
> integration using the WsdlClient approach.
>
> Can I just 'switch' clients? Instead of sending messages to
> the OT proxy I should just invoke WsdlClient
> >>executeSelector: ?. Are complex types handled to same way
> as in the OT approach?
>
> In general, when is the OT approach preferred over the WsdlClient?
>
> Kind regards,
> Philippe
> ________________________________________
> From: Kogan, Tamara [[hidden email]]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:03 PM
> To: Philippe Demaecker; [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> To provide Http authentication you need to switch from
> Opentalk client to WsdlClient and use #transportClient
> (HttpClient) to set proxy and authentication.
>
>
> Tamara Kogan
> Smalltalk development,
> Cincom Systems
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email]
> > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:22 PM
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
> >
> > Hello list,
> >
> >
> >
> > We are currently using a WSOpentTalk SOAP service to integrate with
> > one of our customer web services.
> >
> >
> >
> > The tests were going well, but in the meantime, an additional
> > requirement has popped up: the service should go through a
> proxy using
> > basic HTTP authentication instead of communicating directly
> with the
> > final WS endpoint.
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there support for this in VW 7.7?
> >
> >
> >
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Philippe
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> vwnc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwnc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Demaecker [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:26 AM
> To: Philippe Demaecker; Kogan, Tamara; [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello,
>
> We were able to figure it out with the help of a collegue. It
> seems the use of structs vs. real objects is configurable, so
> the switch to WsdlClient should be an easy one.
>
> Best,
> Philippe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: dinsdag 22 maart 2011 9:50
> To: Kogan, Tamara; [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems OT uses Struct objects to represent complex objects,
> which means no compatibility with the my implementation, right?
>
> I read from the 7.7 docs:
>
> "Class WsdlClient supports all standard forms of HTTP
> authentication (e.g., Basic, Digest and NTLM schemas).
> Instances of WsdlClient use an HttpClient object as a
> transport mechanism, and the latter provides the actual
> support for authentication.HTTP authentication is presently
> available only for applications using the WsdlClient. This
> functionality is under active development for Opentalk and
> will be included in a future release."
>
> What is the status on this? Is there anything I can use yet?
>
> Thank you,
> Philippe
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> Sent: maandag 21 maart 2011 23:28
> To: Kogan, Tamara; [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> Hello Tamara,
>
> Thanks for the tip. I indeed read in the doc that
> authentication was supported using the WsdlClient.
>
> The whole interface has already been developed using the OT
> and I'm not sure how much work it will be to rewrite the
> integration using the WsdlClient approach.
>
> Can I just 'switch' clients? Instead of sending messages to
> the OT proxy I should just invoke WsdlClient
> >>executeSelector: ?. Are complex types handled to same way
> as in the OT approach?
>
> In general, when is the OT approach preferred over the WsdlClient?
>
> Kind regards,
> Philippe
> ________________________________________
> From: Kogan, Tamara [[hidden email]]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:03 PM
> To: Philippe Demaecker; [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
>
> To provide Http authentication you need to switch from
> Opentalk client to WsdlClient and use #transportClient
> (HttpClient) to set proxy and authentication.
>
>
> Tamara Kogan
> Smalltalk development,
> Cincom Systems
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email]
> > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philippe Demaecker
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:22 PM
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: [vwnc] HTTP Basic Authentication & SOAP
> >
> > Hello list,
> >
> >
> >
> > We are currently using a WSOpentTalk SOAP service to integrate with
> > one of our customer web services.
> >
> >
> >
> > The tests were going well, but in the meantime, an additional
> > requirement has popped up: the service should go through a
> proxy using
> > basic HTTP authentication instead of communicating directly
> with the
> > final WS endpoint.
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there support for this in VW 7.7?
> >
> >
> >
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Philippe
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> vwnc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwnc mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc
>