Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

philippeback
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

SergeStinckwich
Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)

2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
> http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/



--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

philippe.back@highoctane.be

LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.

I'll do a writeup on my blog.

Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.

Phil

On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)

2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
> http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/



--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

SergeStinckwich
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>
> I'll do a writeup on my blog.
>
> Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.

Yes, I think so.
I would like to push Pharo in this area in the future, especially with
LoRa sensors. We will organize a meeting for wireless sensors for
environmental surveillance in May.
are you interested to present something around Pharo ?

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

philippe.back@highoctane.be

Sure. I've got a LoRa kit with sensors etc.

API should work but LoRa gateway may be an issue.

I may be able to ask for a pico receiver.

Phil

On Feb 22, 2016 5:25 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>
> I'll do a writeup on my blog.
>
> Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.

Yes, I think so.
I would like to push Pharo in this area in the future, especially with
LoRa sensors. We will organize a meeting for wireless sensors for
environmental surveillance in May.
are you interested to present something around Pharo ?

Regards,
--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

Stephan Eggermont-3
In reply to this post by philippe.back@highoctane.be
On 22/02/16 15:07, [hidden email]
wrote:
> LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>
> I'll do a writeup on my blog.

Please do. LoRa looks very interesting.

Stephan



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

stepharo
In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich
When?
I would like to attend

Le 22/2/16 17:22, Serge Stinckwich a écrit :

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, [hidden email]
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>>
>> I'll do a writeup on my blog.
>>
>> Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.
> Yes, I think so.
> I would like to push Pharo in this area in the future, especially with
> LoRa sensors. We will organize a meeting for wireless sensors for
> environmental surveillance in May.
> are you interested to present something around Pharo ?
>
> Regards,


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

stepharo
In reply to this post by philippe.back@highoctane.be
I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT platform in the future

Le 22/2/16 15:07, [hidden email] a écrit :

LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.

I'll do a writeup on my blog.

Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.

Phil

On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)

2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
> http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/



--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

Ben Coman
There is real business opportunity for "Industrial" Internet of
Things.  Morphic (and next Block) makes Pharo would make a fantastic
platform for the HMI (Human Machine Intereface) of a factory or
machine. And its good reoccurring work, as engineers are *paid* to
consult on troubleshooting, optimising and modifying the factory
automation code as factories evolve over time.

Two significant enabling technologies are...

OPC (Open Platform Computing) - This is *the* integration protocol for
factories. Its the most widely adopted interoperability standard for
secure, reliable and platform-independent information exchange for
industrial automation.

  * Over 500 OPC Foundation members and thousands of OPC-compliant products
     https://opcfoundation.org/members

  * Understanding OPC: Open Connectivity via Open Standards
    http://www.automation.com/pdf_articles/Understanding_OPC_Kepware_eBook.pdf

EtherCAT - Ethernet for Control Automation Technology adds real-time
and other capabilities to classic Ethernet

 * Endorsed by more than 3,000 companies
     https://www.ethercat.org/en/members.php

 * What are the advantages of EtherCAT over other fieldbus technologies?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3j6segCpEc

 * High speed servo control of motors over EtherCAT - simply not
possible with any other industrial comms protocol
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXb_m8p3Yt4

 * MCUs and EtherCAT Gear Up for the Industrial Internet of Things.
    http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2015/aug/mcus-and-ethercat-gear-up-for-the-industrial-internet-of-things

 * The *biggest* advantages is the use of standard ethernet, doing
away with proprietary hardware and consequent vendor lock in.
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klxwX_44DcM (stop watching a 5:00)


And now these two technology groups are now working together...
https://opcfoundation.org/news/press-releases/opc-foundation-ethercat-technology-group-sign-mou/


cheers -ben



On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT platform in
> the future
>
> Le 22/2/16 15:07, [hidden email] a écrit :
>
> LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>
> I'll do a writeup on my blog.
>
> Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.
>
> Phil
>
> On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)
>>
>> 2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>> >
>> > http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

philippe.back@highoctane.be

FWIW I'll be looking at an industrial bigdata project starting next week.

This is solid stuff and I'll be a recommender for some things.

Maybe should we focus on the data feeding side of things. How fast can we be?

Phil

On Feb 23, 2016 11:07 AM, "Ben Coman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
There is real business opportunity for "Industrial" Internet of
Things.  Morphic (and next Block) makes Pharo would make a fantastic
platform for the HMI (Human Machine Intereface) of a factory or
machine. And its good reoccurring work, as engineers are *paid* to
consult on troubleshooting, optimising and modifying the factory
automation code as factories evolve over time.

Two significant enabling technologies are...

OPC (Open Platform Computing) - This is *the* integration protocol for
factories. Its the most widely adopted interoperability standard for
secure, reliable and platform-independent information exchange for
industrial automation.

  * Over 500 OPC Foundation members and thousands of OPC-compliant products
     https://opcfoundation.org/members

  * Understanding OPC: Open Connectivity via Open Standards
    http://www.automation.com/pdf_articles/Understanding_OPC_Kepware_eBook.pdf

EtherCAT - Ethernet for Control Automation Technology adds real-time
and other capabilities to classic Ethernet

 * Endorsed by more than 3,000 companies
     https://www.ethercat.org/en/members.php

 * What are the advantages of EtherCAT over other fieldbus technologies?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3j6segCpEc

 * High speed servo control of motors over EtherCAT - simply not
possible with any other industrial comms protocol
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXb_m8p3Yt4

 * MCUs and EtherCAT Gear Up for the Industrial Internet of Things.
    http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2015/aug/mcus-and-ethercat-gear-up-for-the-industrial-internet-of-things

 * The *biggest* advantages is the use of standard ethernet, doing
away with proprietary hardware and consequent vendor lock in.
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klxwX_44DcM (stop watching a 5:00)


And now these two technology groups are now working together...
https://opcfoundation.org/news/press-releases/opc-foundation-ethercat-technology-group-sign-mou/


cheers -ben



On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT platform in
> the future
>
> Le 22/2/16 15:07, [hidden email] a écrit :
>
> LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>
> I'll do a writeup on my blog.
>
> Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.
>
> Phil
>
> On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)
>>
>> 2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>> >
>> > http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

Ben Coman
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:32 PM, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> FWIW I'll be looking at an industrial bigdata project starting next week.
> This is solid stuff and I'll be a recommender for some things.

And btw, there is always the old warhorse "Modbus" that *everything*
understands because its such a simple protocol.  One problem with
industrial environments is often dealing with a lot of equipment 20+
years old equipment.  I'm keen one day to write a Modbus client for
Pharo.

If you want to get a feel for OPC technology, one leading vendor
Matrikon provide some tutorials and free simulation software[1] you
can practice on.  There are some open source Python clients you can
connect to that server that helps to clarify the essentials and
feasibility for a Pharo connection.

> Maybe should we focus on the data feeding side of things.
> How fast can we be?

I don't understand the context of the question. Happy to advise
off-list on any domain specific queries to help Pharo get a leg up.
cheers -ben
https://au.linkedin.com/in/bencoman

[1] https://www.matrikonopc.com/downloads/178/index.aspx

>
> Phil
>
> On Feb 23, 2016 11:07 AM, "Ben Coman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> There is real business opportunity for "Industrial" Internet of
>> Things.  Morphic (and next Block) makes Pharo would make a fantastic
>> platform for the HMI (Human Machine Intereface) of a factory or
>> machine. And its good reoccurring work, as engineers are *paid* to
>> consult on troubleshooting, optimising and modifying the factory
>> automation code as factories evolve over time.
>>
>> Two significant enabling technologies are...
>>
>> OPC (Open Platform Computing) - This is *the* integration protocol for
>> factories. Its the most widely adopted interoperability standard for
>> secure, reliable and platform-independent information exchange for
>> industrial automation.
>>
>>   * Over 500 OPC Foundation members and thousands of OPC-compliant
>> products
>>      https://opcfoundation.org/members
>>
>>   * Understanding OPC: Open Connectivity via Open Standards
>>
>> http://www.automation.com/pdf_articles/Understanding_OPC_Kepware_eBook.pdf
>>
>> EtherCAT - Ethernet for Control Automation Technology adds real-time
>> and other capabilities to classic Ethernet
>>
>>  * Endorsed by more than 3,000 companies
>>      https://www.ethercat.org/en/members.php
>>
>>  * What are the advantages of EtherCAT over other fieldbus technologies?
>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3j6segCpEc
>>
>>  * High speed servo control of motors over EtherCAT - simply not
>> possible with any other industrial comms protocol
>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXb_m8p3Yt4
>>
>>  * MCUs and EtherCAT Gear Up for the Industrial Internet of Things.
>>
>> http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2015/aug/mcus-and-ethercat-gear-up-for-the-industrial-internet-of-things
>>
>>  * The *biggest* advantages is the use of standard ethernet, doing
>> away with proprietary hardware and consequent vendor lock in.
>>      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klxwX_44DcM (stop watching a 5:00)
>>
>>
>> And now these two technology groups are now working together...
>>
>> https://opcfoundation.org/news/press-releases/opc-foundation-ethercat-technology-group-sign-mou/
>>
>>
>> cheers -ben
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT
>> > platform in
>> > the future
>> >
>> > Le 22/2/16 15:07, [hidden email] a écrit :
>> >
>> > LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>> >
>> > I'll do a writeup on my blog.
>> >
>> > Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.
>> >
>> > Phil
>> >
>> > On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)
>> >>
>> >> 2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Serge Stinckwich
>> >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Hackathon IoT. I used Pharo.

philippeback
Very cool.

I am downloading the OPC test software.

Yeah MODBUS is in the picture (as are a ton of other data source).

Thx for the info! Depending on serendipitous conditions, I'll be able to land a prototyping contract and Pharo would be a good thing to use, even if it has to do some OSProcess calls to speed things up development time wise.

Philippe

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:32 PM, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> FWIW I'll be looking at an industrial bigdata project starting next week.
> This is solid stuff and I'll be a recommender for some things.

And btw, there is always the old warhorse "Modbus" that *everything*
understands because its such a simple protocol.  One problem with
industrial environments is often dealing with a lot of equipment 20+
years old equipment.  I'm keen one day to write a Modbus client for
Pharo.

If you want to get a feel for OPC technology, one leading vendor
Matrikon provide some tutorials and free simulation software[1] you
can practice on.  There are some open source Python clients you can
connect to that server that helps to clarify the essentials and
feasibility for a Pharo connection.

> Maybe should we focus on the data feeding side of things.
> How fast can we be?

I don't understand the context of the question. Happy to advise
off-list on any domain specific queries to help Pharo get a leg up.
cheers -ben
https://au.linkedin.com/in/bencoman

[1] https://www.matrikonopc.com/downloads/178/index.aspx

>
> Phil
>
> On Feb 23, 2016 11:07 AM, "Ben Coman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> There is real business opportunity for "Industrial" Internet of
>> Things.  Morphic (and next Block) makes Pharo would make a fantastic
>> platform for the HMI (Human Machine Intereface) of a factory or
>> machine. And its good reoccurring work, as engineers are *paid* to
>> consult on troubleshooting, optimising and modifying the factory
>> automation code as factories evolve over time.
>>
>> Two significant enabling technologies are...
>>
>> OPC (Open Platform Computing) - This is *the* integration protocol for
>> factories. Its the most widely adopted interoperability standard for
>> secure, reliable and platform-independent information exchange for
>> industrial automation.
>>
>>   * Over 500 OPC Foundation members and thousands of OPC-compliant
>> products
>>      https://opcfoundation.org/members
>>
>>   * Understanding OPC: Open Connectivity via Open Standards
>>
>> http://www.automation.com/pdf_articles/Understanding_OPC_Kepware_eBook.pdf
>>
>> EtherCAT - Ethernet for Control Automation Technology adds real-time
>> and other capabilities to classic Ethernet
>>
>>  * Endorsed by more than 3,000 companies
>>      https://www.ethercat.org/en/members.php
>>
>>  * What are the advantages of EtherCAT over other fieldbus technologies?
>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3j6segCpEc
>>
>>  * High speed servo control of motors over EtherCAT - simply not
>> possible with any other industrial comms protocol
>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXb_m8p3Yt4
>>
>>  * MCUs and EtherCAT Gear Up for the Industrial Internet of Things.
>>
>> http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2015/aug/mcus-and-ethercat-gear-up-for-the-industrial-internet-of-things
>>
>>  * The *biggest* advantages is the use of standard ethernet, doing
>> away with proprietary hardware and consequent vendor lock in.
>>      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klxwX_44DcM (stop watching a 5:00)
>>
>>
>> And now these two technology groups are now working together...
>>
>> https://opcfoundation.org/news/press-releases/opc-foundation-ethercat-technology-group-sign-mou/
>>
>>
>> cheers -ben
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT
>> > platform in
>> > the future
>> >
>> > Le 22/2/16 15:07, [hidden email] a écrit :
>> >
>> > LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo.
>> >
>> > I'll do a writeup on my blog.
>> >
>> > Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space.
>> >
>> > Phil
>> >
>> > On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)
>> >>
>> >> 2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Serge Stinckwich
>> >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
>> >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>> >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>> >>
>> >
>>
>