Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-)
2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>: > http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/ -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ |
LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo. I'll do a writeup on my blog. Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space. Phil On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-) |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]> wrote: > LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo. > > I'll do a writeup on my blog. > > Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space. Yes, I think so. I would like to push Pharo in this area in the future, especially with LoRa sensors. We will organize a meeting for wireless sensors for environmental surveillance in May. are you interested to present something around Pharo ? Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ |
Sure. I've got a LoRa kit with sensors etc. API should work but LoRa gateway may be an issue. I may be able to ask for a pico receiver. Phil On Feb 22, 2016 5:25 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by philippe.back@highoctane.be
On 22/02/16 15:07, [hidden email]
wrote: > LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo. > > I'll do a writeup on my blog. Please do. LoRa looks very interesting. Stephan |
In reply to this post by SergeStinckwich
When?
I would like to attend Le 22/2/16 17:22, Serge Stinckwich a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, [hidden email] > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo. >> >> I'll do a writeup on my blog. >> >> Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space. > Yes, I think so. > I would like to push Pharo in this area in the future, especially with > LoRa sensors. We will organize a meeting for wireless sensors for > environmental surveillance in May. > are you interested to present something around Pharo ? > > Regards, |
In reply to this post by philippe.back@highoctane.be
I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT
platform in the future
Le 22/2/16 15:07,
[hidden email] a écrit :
|
There is real business opportunity for "Industrial" Internet of
Things. Morphic (and next Block) makes Pharo would make a fantastic platform for the HMI (Human Machine Intereface) of a factory or machine. And its good reoccurring work, as engineers are *paid* to consult on troubleshooting, optimising and modifying the factory automation code as factories evolve over time. Two significant enabling technologies are... OPC (Open Platform Computing) - This is *the* integration protocol for factories. Its the most widely adopted interoperability standard for secure, reliable and platform-independent information exchange for industrial automation. * Over 500 OPC Foundation members and thousands of OPC-compliant products https://opcfoundation.org/members * Understanding OPC: Open Connectivity via Open Standards http://www.automation.com/pdf_articles/Understanding_OPC_Kepware_eBook.pdf EtherCAT - Ethernet for Control Automation Technology adds real-time and other capabilities to classic Ethernet * Endorsed by more than 3,000 companies https://www.ethercat.org/en/members.php * What are the advantages of EtherCAT over other fieldbus technologies? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3j6segCpEc * High speed servo control of motors over EtherCAT - simply not possible with any other industrial comms protocol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXb_m8p3Yt4 * MCUs and EtherCAT Gear Up for the Industrial Internet of Things. http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2015/aug/mcus-and-ethercat-gear-up-for-the-industrial-internet-of-things * The *biggest* advantages is the use of standard ethernet, doing away with proprietary hardware and consequent vendor lock in. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klxwX_44DcM (stop watching a 5:00) And now these two technology groups are now working together... https://opcfoundation.org/news/press-releases/opc-foundation-ethercat-technology-group-sign-mou/ cheers -ben On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT platform in > the future > > Le 22/2/16 15:07, [hidden email] a écrit : > > LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo. > > I'll do a writeup on my blog. > > Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space. > > Phil > > On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> >> Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-) >> >> 2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>: >> > >> > http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> > |
FWIW I'll be looking at an industrial bigdata project starting next week. This is solid stuff and I'll be a recommender for some things. Maybe should we focus on the data feeding side of things. How fast can we be? Phil On Feb 23, 2016 11:07 AM, "Ben Coman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
There is real business opportunity for "Industrial" Internet of |
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:32 PM, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]> wrote: > FWIW I'll be looking at an industrial bigdata project starting next week. > This is solid stuff and I'll be a recommender for some things. And btw, there is always the old warhorse "Modbus" that *everything* understands because its such a simple protocol. One problem with industrial environments is often dealing with a lot of equipment 20+ years old equipment. I'm keen one day to write a Modbus client for Pharo. If you want to get a feel for OPC technology, one leading vendor Matrikon provide some tutorials and free simulation software[1] you can practice on. There are some open source Python clients you can connect to that server that helps to clarify the essentials and feasibility for a Pharo connection. > Maybe should we focus on the data feeding side of things. > How fast can we be? I don't understand the context of the question. Happy to advise off-list on any domain specific queries to help Pharo get a leg up. cheers -ben https://au.linkedin.com/in/bencoman [1] https://www.matrikonopc.com/downloads/178/index.aspx > > Phil > > On Feb 23, 2016 11:07 AM, "Ben Coman" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> There is real business opportunity for "Industrial" Internet of >> Things. Morphic (and next Block) makes Pharo would make a fantastic >> platform for the HMI (Human Machine Intereface) of a factory or >> machine. And its good reoccurring work, as engineers are *paid* to >> consult on troubleshooting, optimising and modifying the factory >> automation code as factories evolve over time. >> >> Two significant enabling technologies are... >> >> OPC (Open Platform Computing) - This is *the* integration protocol for >> factories. Its the most widely adopted interoperability standard for >> secure, reliable and platform-independent information exchange for >> industrial automation. >> >> * Over 500 OPC Foundation members and thousands of OPC-compliant >> products >> https://opcfoundation.org/members >> >> * Understanding OPC: Open Connectivity via Open Standards >> >> http://www.automation.com/pdf_articles/Understanding_OPC_Kepware_eBook.pdf >> >> EtherCAT - Ethernet for Control Automation Technology adds real-time >> and other capabilities to classic Ethernet >> >> * Endorsed by more than 3,000 companies >> https://www.ethercat.org/en/members.php >> >> * What are the advantages of EtherCAT over other fieldbus technologies? >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3j6segCpEc >> >> * High speed servo control of motors over EtherCAT - simply not >> possible with any other industrial comms protocol >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXb_m8p3Yt4 >> >> * MCUs and EtherCAT Gear Up for the Industrial Internet of Things. >> >> http://www.digikey.com/en/articles/techzone/2015/aug/mcus-and-ethercat-gear-up-for-the-industrial-internet-of-things >> >> * The *biggest* advantages is the use of standard ethernet, doing >> away with proprietary hardware and consequent vendor lock in. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klxwX_44DcM (stop watching a 5:00) >> >> >> And now these two technology groups are now working together... >> >> https://opcfoundation.org/news/press-releases/opc-foundation-ethercat-technology-group-sign-mou/ >> >> >> cheers -ben >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > I'm interested too because we Rmod wants to check Pharo as a IoT >> > platform in >> > the future >> > >> > Le 22/2/16 15:07, [hidden email] a écrit : >> > >> > LoRa stuff with sensors etc. Integrated REST apis for that in Pharo. >> > >> > I'll do a writeup on my blog. >> > >> > Lots of opportunities for Pharo in that space. >> > >> > Phil >> > >> > On Feb 22, 2016 2:49 PM, "Serge Stinckwich" <[hidden email]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Great ! What did you exactly, I'm interested by details ;-) >> >> >> >> 2016-02-22 14:42 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > http://geeko.lesoir.be/2016/02/22/hackapost-un-hackathon-sur-les-applis-iot-pour-le-service-postal-belge/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Serge Stinckwich >> >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> >> >> > >> > |
Very cool. I am downloading the OPC test software. Yeah MODBUS is in the picture (as are a ton of other data source). Thx for the info! Depending on serendipitous conditions, I'll be able to land a prototyping contract and Pharo would be a good thing to use, even if it has to do some OSProcess calls to speed things up development time wise. Philippe On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> wrote: On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:32 PM, [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |