I didn't see one in the image & I'm happy to implement one but thought I'd ask before I did.
Thanks Paul |
It is already in the image: SequenceableCollection>>#findBinary:do:ifNone: & friends ;-)
> On 18 May 2017, at 20:22, PAUL DEBRUICKER <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I didn't see one in the image & I'm happy to implement one but thought I'd ask before I did. > > Thanks > > Paul |
Great! How long has it been there? :)
And why is it in SequenceableCollection and not SortedCollection? Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2017-05-18 16:01 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]>: > It is already in the image: SequenceableCollection>>#findBinary:do:ifNone: & friends ;-) > >> On 18 May 2017, at 20:22, PAUL DEBRUICKER <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> I didn't see one in the image & I'm happy to implement one but thought I'd ask before I did. >> >> Thanks >> >> Paul > > |
> On 18 May 2017, at 21:08, Esteban A. Maringolo <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Great! How long has it been there? :) Apparently since 2012 - can't really remember > And why is it in SequenceableCollection and not SortedCollection? Hmm, probably because any SequenceableCollection could be sorted up front, like in ((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) sort. BTW, we also have #threeWayCompareTo: (the spaceship operator, aka <=>) (((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) , #(66)) sort findBinaryIndex: [ :x | 66 threeWayCompareTo: x ] > Regards! > Esteban A. Maringolo > > > 2017-05-18 16:01 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]>: >> It is already in the image: SequenceableCollection>>#findBinary:do:ifNone: & friends ;-) >> >>> On 18 May 2017, at 20:22, PAUL DEBRUICKER <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> I didn't see one in the image & I'm happy to implement one but thought I'd ask before I did. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Paul >> >> > |
2017-05-18 17:18 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]>:
>> On 18 May 2017, at 21:08, Esteban A. Maringolo <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Great! How long has it been there? :) > Apparently since 2012 - can't really remember My gosh, I remember searching for that years ago. >> And why is it in SequenceableCollection and not SortedCollection? > Hmm, probably because any SequenceableCollection could be sorted up front, like in > ((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) sort. Ok, makes sense. > BTW, we also have #threeWayCompareTo: (the spaceship operator, aka <=>) > > (((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) , #(66)) sort > findBinaryIndex: [ :x | 66 threeWayCompareTo: x ] I think that method is part of the SortFunctions package I ported. It is not in my Pharo 5 image at least. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo |
> On 18 May 2017, at 22:47, Esteban A. Maringolo <[hidden email]> wrote: > > 2017-05-18 17:18 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]>: >>> On 18 May 2017, at 21:08, Esteban A. Maringolo <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> Great! How long has it been there? :) >> Apparently since 2012 - can't really remember > > My gosh, I remember searching for that years ago. > >>> And why is it in SequenceableCollection and not SortedCollection? >> Hmm, probably because any SequenceableCollection could be sorted up front, like in >> ((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) sort. > > Ok, makes sense. > >> BTW, we also have #threeWayCompareTo: (the spaceship operator, aka <=>) >> >> (((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) , #(66)) sort >> findBinaryIndex: [ :x | 66 threeWayCompareTo: x ] > > I think that method is part of the SortFunctions package I ported. It > is not in my Pharo 5 image at least. Haha, yes, indeed: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17728/Integrate-Travis-Griggs-TAG-SortFunctions One of the many new things in Pharo 6 > Regards! > > Esteban A. Maringolo > |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:18:34PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> > > On 18 May 2017, at 21:08, Esteban A. Maringolo <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Great! How long has it been there? :) > > Apparently since 2012 - can't really remember > Looking at a Squeak 3.0 image I would say that they were introduced in 2000, and the author was Andreas Raab. Dave |
> On 19 May 2017, at 00:47, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:18:34PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> On 18 May 2017, at 21:08, Esteban A. Maringolo <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Great! How long has it been there? :) >> >> Apparently since 2012 - can't really remember >> > > Looking at a Squeak 3.0 image I would say that they were introduced in 2000, > and the author was Andreas Raab. Makes sense, I knew that code was older ... > Dave > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |