Alejandro and I are working on a new profiling technique to identify redundant objects.
We’ve heard there are some effort on increasing the range of identity hash values. Currently, it goes up to 4096, which is not much. Can someone tell us about this?
Also, I discovered that -100 hash = -100. Does this make sense?
Alejandro and I are working on a new profiling technique to
identify redundant objects.
We’ve heard there are some effort on increasing the range of
identity hash values. Currently, it goes up to 4096, which is
not much. Can someone tell us about this?
Check the spur format on clement's blog. If I remember we will have
12 bits for hashes soon.
Also, I discovered that -100 hash = -100. Does this make
sense?
On Sep 26, 2014, at 4:02 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!
Alejandro and I are working on a new profiling technique to
identify redundant objects.
We’ve heard there are some effort on increasing the range of
identity hash values. Currently, it goes up to 4096, which is
not much. Can someone tell us about this?
Check the spur format on clement's blog. If I remember we will have
12 bits for hashes soon.
Also, I discovered that -100 hash = -100. Does this make
sense?
Locked
