I want to share with this list, this outstanding visualization of open source project evolution:
See the evolution of a project. It's one of the reasons I prefer public repos, based on Git, Mercurial or alike. _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Yes, Indeed, is the power of open source! :)
2013/1/7 Angel Java Lopez <[hidden email]> I want to share with this list, this outstanding visualization of open source project evolution: _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
And one link more, for future references, about pull request in Git/GitHub
How to make your first Node.js pull request
http://writings.nunojob.com/2012/07/how-to-make-your-first-Node.js-pull-request.html It could be used as a guide for any GitHub project collaborator Only a few lines are "Node-dependent" (the commands that start with 'npm').
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Germán Arduino <[hidden email]> wrote: Yes, Indeed, is the power of open source! :) _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Thanks for the contribution Angel.
I need to learn a lot about GitHub still.... 2013/1/7 Angel Java Lopez <[hidden email]> And one link more, for future references, about pull request in Git/GitHub _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
In reply to this post by garduino
Hello,
Yes, thank you as well for this contribution, Angel. Amazing to watch these visualizations. From the perspective of the examples given (PhP, Python, OpenOffice, ....) the forking of Squeak to Pharo and Cuis (and other earlier forks like Scratch and Etoys) seems not to be something extraordinary. It is the way how open source software is developed to suit people's need. Interesting to see how pieces of code are exchanged forth and back between the different forks. This is actually happens as well between Squeak (www.squeak.org) , Pharo (http://www.pharo-project.org/) and Cuis. All share a common virtual machine and _very_ important, the same license (MIT). This makes things go smooth. It is helpful to check out how something is done in Squeak and Pharo in comparison to Cuis for example. It allows to search for good solutions. Having different forks unblocks the development process in many ways as it allows to be exploratory. For Cuis one of the distinctive features is that we really want to make good use of github. (as of now we have just started to do that, thank you Angel for your guidance :-) --Hannes On 1/7/13, Germán Arduino <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes, Indeed, is the power of open source! :) > > 2013/1/7 Angel Java Lopez <[hidden email]> > >> I want to share with this list, this outstanding visualization of open >> source project evolution: >> >> >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2013/01/01/how-open-source-software-blooms-gource-version-control-visualizations-from-google/ >> >> See the evolution of a project. It's one of the reasons I prefer public >> repos, based on Git, Mercurial or alike. _______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Hi:
2013/1/7 H. Hirzel <[hidden email]>
Hello, A little comment here, I think the greatest value of Cuis is cleaning and simplicity, is really understandable. I can not say the same about Squeak nor Pharo. I'm going deep in both images (Squeak 4.4 and Pharo 1.4) to make the cleanest possible implementation of network features needed in Cuis and the nightmare is important (Said with all respect, of course).
_______________________________________________ Cuis mailing list [hidden email] http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |