Hi, I've been struggling with this one more-or-less since my last post. Having compiled and installed 2.2 based on the repository, I found that I can't load .so shared libraries any more. Further investigation determines that the variable LTDL_SHLIB_EXT is no longer being set in the configure process. The same is true for the smalltalk-2.2 tarball, incidentally, but smalltalk-2.1g was OK. The configure scripts are just too lengthy and convoluted for me to work this out (and I have tried). A secondary problem is that, on my Gentoo system, there are comments inserted into /etc/ld.so.conf (by the command etc-update) which are not stripped out, although I'm not sure this would actually break anything. Pls. help. Mike _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Mike Anderson (29.04. 19:51):
> A secondary problem is that, on my Gentoo system, there are comments > inserted into /etc/ld.so.conf (by the command etc-update) which are not > stripped out, although I'm not sure this would actually break anything. I am running gentoo (~amd64) here, too, and there are only two comment lines in /etc/ld.so.conf # ld.so.conf autogenerated by env-update; make all changes to # contents of /etc/env.d directory They don't break anything. If you have a short code sample, I'll give my gst a try. s. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> Mike Anderson (29.04. 19:51): > > >>A secondary problem is that, on my Gentoo system, there are comments >>inserted into /etc/ld.so.conf (by the command etc-update) which are not >>stripped out, although I'm not sure this would actually break anything. > > > I am running gentoo (~amd64) here, too, and there are only two comment > lines in /etc/ld.so.conf > > # ld.so.conf autogenerated by env-update; make all changes to > # contents of /etc/env.d directory That's right. > They don't break anything. Not normally, but they end up in LTDL_SYSSEARCH_PATH with each word as a separate entry. It isn't very likely to get used, as far as I can see. In fact, it seems to me that it shouldn't be there at all. > If you have a short code sample, I'll give my gst a try. In gst: DLD addLibrary: 'libpq'! DLD libraryList printNl! I'm expecting something like: OrderedCollection ('libpq'->CObject(16r8335898) ) not: OrderedCollection ('libpq'->nil ) which is what I get now. Replace libpq with any library that has a .so but no .la. Mind you, I've just tried this with 2.1g and I'm getting nil with that as well. I could have sworn that used to work. Now I'm really confused. Thanks for testing. You'll help my sanity if nothing else. Mike _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Mike Anderson (29.04. 22:34):
> I'm expecting something like: > OrderedCollection ('libpq'->CObject(16r8335898) ) > > not: > OrderedCollection ('libpq'->nil ) > > which is what I get now. Replace libpq with any library that has a .so > but no .la. I've tried this with my stock gentoo gst (USE="emacs gtk readline tcltk -gmp") st> DLD addLibrary: 'libpq'! DLD st> DLD libraryList printNl! OrderedCollection ('libpq'->nil ) OrderedCollection new: 16 "<0x2aaaab447b10>" st> DLD addLibrary: 'libz'! DLD st> DLD libraryList printNl! OrderedCollection ('libpq'->nil 'libz'->nil ) OrderedCollection new: 16 "<0x2aaaab44a2e0>" The same happens on a amd64 Debian box with v.2.1.12. Maybe the libraries have only been registered, but not loaded? s. -- Stefan Schmiedl +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ |Approximity GmbH | EDV-Beratung Schmiedl | |http://www.approximity.com | Am Bräuweiher 4, 93499 Zandt, Germany | |mailto:[hidden email] | Tel. (09944) 3068-98, Fax -97 | +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> The same happens on a amd64 Debian box with v.2.1.12. This is also confusing very confusing; I've definitely sucessfully interfaced with libpq and libmysqlclient under 2.1g. Well, I've just unpacked a clean 2.1g tarball, and it does sucessfully #define LTDL_SHLIB_EXT ".so", so maybe I'm not losing my mind. ...and smalltalk-2.2 doesn't. > Maybe the libraries have only been registered, > but not loaded? The thing that alerted me to the problem is that I couldn't access any functions in the library I had just loaded :). I've got as far as putting debug statements into the code, and the sections surrounded by #IFDEF LTDL_SHLIB_EXT are not being executed - it isn't even trying to load .so extensions (in fact, it tries to load libpq.so.la). That test does work for .la libraries, you see. Mike _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Mike Anderson (30.04. 13:38):
> Stefan Schmiedl wrote: > > The same happens on a amd64 Debian box with v.2.1.12. > > This is also confusing very confusing; I've definitely sucessfully > interfaced with libpq and libmysqlclient under 2.1g. I see that this gst is sitting in /usr/local, so it's not from an official package, probably I've compiled it myself right after Paolo finished cleaning the code for 64-bit systems. > > Well, I've just unpacked a clean 2.1g tarball, and it does sucessfully > #define LTDL_SHLIB_EXT ".so", so maybe I'm not losing my mind. > > ...and smalltalk-2.2 doesn't. > > > Maybe the libraries have only been registered, > > but not loaded? > > The thing that alerted me to the problem is that I couldn't access any > functions in the library I had just loaded :). I can see that you would notice this effect ... s. -- Stefan Schmiedl +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ |Approximity GmbH | EDV-Beratung Schmiedl | |http://www.approximity.com | Am Bräuweiher 4, 93499 Zandt, Germany | |mailto:[hidden email] | Tel. (09944) 3068-98, Fax -97 | +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
In reply to this post by Mike Anderson-3
To reply to myself, I've now realized that, as Stefan suggested, it's never worked in the stable branch, and it came into the devel branch with 2.1c. Paolo, the changelog for 2.2 says "* lib-src/ltdl.c: Moved from libltdl." at around the time of 2.1c, so I'm presuming that's the same change as went into the devel branch... ? Regards, Mike _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |