[IDEA] 'All' protocol

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[IDEA] 'All' protocol

Giuseppe
I think could be useful to have an 'All' protocol to see all the  
methods of a class.

What do you think?




_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [IDEA] 'All' protocol

Paolo Bonzini-2
Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz wrote:
> I think could be useful to have an 'All' protocol to see all the methods
> of a class.
>
> What do you think?

Yes, indeed.

> Could be very dificult to have the GUI builted over SDL? COuld be more
> fast, and TCL/TK libs out as dependence.
>
> There are librarys, like http://libagar.org/screenshots.html.en or
> http://guichan.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Screenshots for GUI
> Building.

Not necessarily difficult (don't know those libraries though), but work.
  In principle it would even be possible to port Morphic over SDL.

Paolo


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [IDEA] 'All' protocol

Giuseppe
Yes, but over SDL, we can have MDI, and at least, is more similar. I  
saw the screenshots con the libs I linked for you, and don't looks too  
bad.

Otherwise, What about? XUL? is more portable and fast and his design  
is XML.

El 01/06/2008, a las 21:59, Paolo Bonzini escribió:

> Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz wrote:
>> Uhm...this could be interesting if can be loaded only if needed.
>> The problem I see on Morphic, is thath widgets are not native. This  
>> could be sound as a silly thing, but, if you want to deploy an app,  
>> some users could see strange, or not proffesional, and, if a  
>> customer don't see your app profesional, then, not accept the  
>> project. Users are not ready to changes.
>
> Agreed, but SDL GUI libraries are more similar to Morphic.  They  
> don't have native widgets, they are often designed for game GUIs.
>
> Paolo



_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [IDEA] 'All' protocol

Paolo Bonzini-2
Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz wrote:
> Yes, but over SDL, we can have MDI, and at least, is more similar. I saw
> the screenshots con the libs I linked for you, and don't looks too bad.

SDL doesn't have MDI.

> Otherwise, What about? XUL? is more portable and fast and his design is
> XML.

This is free software.  Write whatever you like to have, and if you
contribute it, it will be included.  More code, less talk is better for
everybody.

Paolo


_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk