Iceberg UI feedback - synchronise v. status

> Le 29 janv. 2018 à 14:16, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
> I hear Iceberg UI is getting a redesign.
> To feed into that... I'm trying to analyse myself, why I've not been
> comfortable with the "Synchronise..." menu item.   I think maybe its
> because that term feels like an "action" that going to "do something"
> when I'm not sure what that something is.    But as I'm getting
> familiar with Iceberg it seems that "Synchronise" might not change the
> state of anything, but first shows current "status" like a combination
> of  `git status` and `git diff`  from the shell, and presents buttons
> and tabs where you *then* perform actions that actually change the
> state of the system.
>
> So I may have the wrong end of the stick, but perhaps replacing
> "Synchronise..." with "Status..." might seem less intimidating.

>
>> Le 29 janv. 2018 à 14:16, Ben Coman <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>
>> I hear Iceberg UI is getting a redesign.
>> To feed into that... I'm trying to analyse myself, why I've not been
>> comfortable with the "Synchronise..." menu item.   I think maybe its
>> because that term feels like an "action" that going to "do something"
>> when I'm not sure what that something is.    But as I'm getting
>> familiar with Iceberg it seems that "Synchronise" might not change the
>> state of anything, but first shows current "status" like a combination
>> of  `git status` and `git diff`  from the shell, and presents buttons
>> and tabs where you *then* perform actions that actually change the
>> state of the system.
>>
>> So I may have the wrong end of the stick, but perhaps replacing
>> "Synchronise..." with "Status..." might seem less intimidating.
>
> Why not « Synchronization view » like in Eclipse?